The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Quackwatch

Forums General Melanoma Community Quackwatch

  • Post
    Gene_S
    Participant

    Hi, It seems (to me) every time someone posts a question about

    alternative treatments there is usually a suggestion to go to the

    "Quackwatch" web site. Here is a link about the creditability of

    Hi, It seems (to me) every time someone posts a question about

    alternative treatments there is usually a suggestion to go to the

    "Quackwatch" web site. Here is a link about the creditability of

    Quackwatch that may be of interest to readers especially those

    who are interested in using unconventional treatments.  See:

     
    Best Wishes,
     
    Gene
Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Replies
      MichaelFL
      Participant

      It seems to them that all modern medicine is a scam and you should only go by what they tell you.

      From their website:

      All our findings come from the independent research of the team that Mr. M assembled. None of it has to be "approved" by any advertising committees or government organizations.It comes to you straight and "undoctored," just as we got it… with full details and complete results and everything you need to understand how you can benefit from the therapy or cure right away.

      And only Natural Health Dossier is permitted to release all the research findings that have been done for Mr. M and continue to provide its readers with new reports as they are issued.

      And if you're willing to act now, you can become a founding member of Natural Health Dossier and get a year-long membership for an incredibly low rate…

       

      MichaelFL
      Participant

      It seems to them that all modern medicine is a scam and you should only go by what they tell you.

      From their website:

      All our findings come from the independent research of the team that Mr. M assembled. None of it has to be "approved" by any advertising committees or government organizations.It comes to you straight and "undoctored," just as we got it… with full details and complete results and everything you need to understand how you can benefit from the therapy or cure right away.

      And only Natural Health Dossier is permitted to release all the research findings that have been done for Mr. M and continue to provide its readers with new reports as they are issued.

      And if you're willing to act now, you can become a founding member of Natural Health Dossier and get a year-long membership for an incredibly low rate…

       

      washoegal
      Participant

      I find it interesting that nhd does not provide a list of their "professionals" and their credentials.  Or at least I couldn't find it.

      washoegal
      Participant

      I find it interesting that nhd does not provide a list of their "professionals" and their credentials.  Or at least I couldn't find it.

        Gene_S
        Participant

        RE:  find it interesting that nhd does not provide a list of their "professionals" and their credentials

        —————————————————-

        OK,  so where do we find the credentials for quackwatch? Please reread the article

         

        The point here is that "quackwatch" is taken as a reliable and trusted

        website and no one here has questioned their credentials… Wake up readers!

        Best wishes,

        Gene

        PS. As you research the internet, the most important question is to ask is who is making money from this, ie…  "Follow The Money!"

        DonW
        Participant

        It's not Barrett who is making claims of medical effectiveness, it's the people he criticizes who do that. He is saying that there is usually no legitimate data to back up the claims made by many alterntaive proponents. In my opinion based on many years of following patient stories on MPIP, he is usually correct about this. He does take his battle too far at times.

        DonW
        Participant

        It's not Barrett who is making claims of medical effectiveness, it's the people he criticizes who do that. He is saying that there is usually no legitimate data to back up the claims made by many alterntaive proponents. In my opinion based on many years of following patient stories on MPIP, he is usually correct about this. He does take his battle too far at times.

        bcl
        Participant

        Hi Gene, no offence, but I think it only seems to you that every time someone posts a question about alternative treatments there's usually a suggestion to go to the"Quackwatch" web site; I hadn't noticed Quackwatch come up nearly that often and did a board search -resulting in just two other posts.  http://www.melanoma.org/search/node/Quackwatch

        You're obviously a staunch believer in alt med Gene,  yet you've previously indicated that you've done very well on a more conventional IPI / GM-CSF trial. I expect the posters who have referred patients to investigate their alt treatments further are simply trying to encourage them look at their choices from all perspectives before laying down "The Money!"

         

         (Interestingly, a google search of 'Quackwatch melanoma' brings this thread up first.)

        Gene_S
        Participant

        Hello bcl,

        No offense taken. 

        My cliff notes story is as follows:

        I have been interested in alternate medicine long before my melanoma adventure began.  I believe that many people could be cured if they started their treatment earlier instead of waiting for their conventional medicine to fail.  Many people seek alternative medicine as a last resort and when it fails they blame alternative medicine treatments for their death.  As far as my treatment, I spent a lot of time researching  ALL treatments for melanoma and was fortunate enough to get into the Ipi (Yervoy) with GM-CSF trial.  My oncologist has a plan B in place if the Ipi didn't work.  I was previously turned down for the Oncovex trial because my tumors in my liver were to large.  Realizing that there are not a lot of options for late stage melanoma I was prepared to go where ever I felt I had the best chance for success in beating this beast.  It should be noted in your research on my profile that you missed one key element  that is part of my success so far.  That is my high range of Vitamin D.  You will probably notice that I post a lot about it also and so far only one person has replied with their situation using Vitamin D.  You will never hear your doctor or oncologist recommend high dose vitamin D.  By the way the best way to get Vitamin D is to go out and sit in the sun at lunch time for 10 to 15 minutes.  I do every chance I get.  I have also researched this myth and there is no proof anywhere that sunlight causes melanoma.  I actually believe that LACK of sunshine is more likely to be the cause because people are very, very vitamin D deficient. 

        As far as the quackwatch comment, would you believe your doctor or oncologist if he had the following credentials:

        How does one separate fact from fiction? It is important to look at the facts that are on record concerning Stephen Barrett:
        He does not hold a current medical license
        He was never board certified in his chosen profession
        He operates Quackwatch out of his Allentown, Pennsylvania basement
        He makes his living “testifying” in frivolous lawsuits

        for the complete article see:

         
        As you can see this is why I say follow the money.  It is very easy to see where Mr. Barrett is coming from and it is very easy to see where the sunscreen industry is coming from.  In the case of the sunscreen industry they have everyone believing the sun is bad for you and they as well as everyone else have no proof.
         
        Best Wishes to you.
         
        Gene (Stage IV)
        Gene_S
        Participant

        Hello bcl,

        No offense taken. 

        My cliff notes story is as follows:

        I have been interested in alternate medicine long before my melanoma adventure began.  I believe that many people could be cured if they started their treatment earlier instead of waiting for their conventional medicine to fail.  Many people seek alternative medicine as a last resort and when it fails they blame alternative medicine treatments for their death.  As far as my treatment, I spent a lot of time researching  ALL treatments for melanoma and was fortunate enough to get into the Ipi (Yervoy) with GM-CSF trial.  My oncologist has a plan B in place if the Ipi didn't work.  I was previously turned down for the Oncovex trial because my tumors in my liver were to large.  Realizing that there are not a lot of options for late stage melanoma I was prepared to go where ever I felt I had the best chance for success in beating this beast.  It should be noted in your research on my profile that you missed one key element  that is part of my success so far.  That is my high range of Vitamin D.  You will probably notice that I post a lot about it also and so far only one person has replied with their situation using Vitamin D.  You will never hear your doctor or oncologist recommend high dose vitamin D.  By the way the best way to get Vitamin D is to go out and sit in the sun at lunch time for 10 to 15 minutes.  I do every chance I get.  I have also researched this myth and there is no proof anywhere that sunlight causes melanoma.  I actually believe that LACK of sunshine is more likely to be the cause because people are very, very vitamin D deficient. 

        As far as the quackwatch comment, would you believe your doctor or oncologist if he had the following credentials:

        How does one separate fact from fiction? It is important to look at the facts that are on record concerning Stephen Barrett:
        He does not hold a current medical license
        He was never board certified in his chosen profession
        He operates Quackwatch out of his Allentown, Pennsylvania basement
        He makes his living “testifying” in frivolous lawsuits

        for the complete article see:

         
        As you can see this is why I say follow the money.  It is very easy to see where Mr. Barrett is coming from and it is very easy to see where the sunscreen industry is coming from.  In the case of the sunscreen industry they have everyone believing the sun is bad for you and they as well as everyone else have no proof.
         
        Best Wishes to you.
         
        Gene (Stage IV)
        bcl
        Participant

        Hi Gene, no offence, but I think it only seems to you that every time someone posts a question about alternative treatments there's usually a suggestion to go to the"Quackwatch" web site; I hadn't noticed Quackwatch come up nearly that often and did a board search -resulting in just two other posts.  http://www.melanoma.org/search/node/Quackwatch

        You're obviously a staunch believer in alt med Gene,  yet you've previously indicated that you've done very well on a more conventional IPI / GM-CSF trial. I expect the posters who have referred patients to investigate their alt treatments further are simply trying to encourage them look at their choices from all perspectives before laying down "The Money!"

         

         (Interestingly, a google search of 'Quackwatch melanoma' brings this thread up first.)

        Gene_S
        Participant

        RE:  find it interesting that nhd does not provide a list of their "professionals" and their credentials

        —————————————————-

        OK,  so where do we find the credentials for quackwatch? Please reread the article

         

        The point here is that "quackwatch" is taken as a reliable and trusted

        website and no one here has questioned their credentials… Wake up readers!

        Best wishes,

        Gene

        PS. As you research the internet, the most important question is to ask is who is making money from this, ie…  "Follow The Money!"

      nicoli
      Participant

      Hi Gene, I  appreciate your postings.

      One thing I have to address is your belief that most people wait to start alternate treatments until they are farther along in their disease or until conventional methods have failed. I know 4 acquantences who have died from cancer in the past 5 years. Every one of them started with alternate medicine at early stage cancer.

      Jeremiah: Stage 2 lympoma, began vita c injections ($2,000 a pop) through a md/naturopath. He had a very wealthy father and was able to spare no expense in his alternate treatments.  After 2 years of various alternative treatments he was pronounced "cured" by the naturopath, despite swellings in most of his body. When he finally agreed to conventional chemo, he was stage 4 and it was too late. This naturopath is extremely popular in our area. This is not the first time he has pronounced a patient "cured" only to have that person die from cancer. The 14 year old boy who died the same way made the papers but this guy is still allowed to kill cancer patiens.

      Sarah: esophegal cancer. Raw foods diet / juicing after surgery to remove her esophegus, and stomach. Died leaving 2 young children. In all fairness, she never really had a chance, esophagel cancer has a very poor prognosis.

      Zenia:  Stage 2 breast cancer, she refused all further surgery after the initial biopsy. Raw foods / juicing. Lots of supplements. Died in 8 months leaving 4 minor children.

      Adan: Diagnosed with lymphoma and immediately went to a clinic in Mexico that friends told him about. He died in Mexico within 6 months. One wife and 8 children.

      Since I live in Colorado, we have lots of hippies and religious cult members. They lean toward the alternative treatments.  I would put most of these friends in those categories although lots of others go with alternative.

      My belief: take all the supplements you want, eat as healthy as you want, do whatever alternative stuff you want but don't forgo the conventional medicine. It just is not strong enough for the ugly, deadly disease called cancer.

      Nicki, Stage 3b

       

      nicoli
      Participant

      Hi Gene, I  appreciate your postings.

      One thing I have to address is your belief that most people wait to start alternate treatments until they are farther along in their disease or until conventional methods have failed. I know 4 acquantences who have died from cancer in the past 5 years. Every one of them started with alternate medicine at early stage cancer.

      Jeremiah: Stage 2 lympoma, began vita c injections ($2,000 a pop) through a md/naturopath. He had a very wealthy father and was able to spare no expense in his alternate treatments.  After 2 years of various alternative treatments he was pronounced "cured" by the naturopath, despite swellings in most of his body. When he finally agreed to conventional chemo, he was stage 4 and it was too late. This naturopath is extremely popular in our area. This is not the first time he has pronounced a patient "cured" only to have that person die from cancer. The 14 year old boy who died the same way made the papers but this guy is still allowed to kill cancer patiens.

      Sarah: esophegal cancer. Raw foods diet / juicing after surgery to remove her esophegus, and stomach. Died leaving 2 young children. In all fairness, she never really had a chance, esophagel cancer has a very poor prognosis.

      Zenia:  Stage 2 breast cancer, she refused all further surgery after the initial biopsy. Raw foods / juicing. Lots of supplements. Died in 8 months leaving 4 minor children.

      Adan: Diagnosed with lymphoma and immediately went to a clinic in Mexico that friends told him about. He died in Mexico within 6 months. One wife and 8 children.

      Since I live in Colorado, we have lots of hippies and religious cult members. They lean toward the alternative treatments.  I would put most of these friends in those categories although lots of others go with alternative.

      My belief: take all the supplements you want, eat as healthy as you want, do whatever alternative stuff you want but don't forgo the conventional medicine. It just is not strong enough for the ugly, deadly disease called cancer.

      Nicki, Stage 3b

       

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Popular Topics