› Forums › General Melanoma Community › pet scan-need advice
- This topic has 24 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 6 months ago by Johnjk04.
- Post
-
- October 25, 2016 at 1:49 pm
Long story short, diagnosed in 2014 Stage 4, done the interferon, IL-2, Ipi, opdivo and now in genetic clinical study. The dr is only doing ct scan (chest, abdomen & pelvis) & mri of face (mel spread to sinus cavity). When I asked if they will be doing pet scan he said no, the study does not require it. My question is should I be concerned of not having a pet scan? Is the ct & mri enough since it is covering the areas where the tumors are? Wanted to get opinions before I call my local onc and talk to him and see if he recommends pet scan. Thanks for your advice.
- Replies
-
-
- October 25, 2016 at 2:56 pm
MRI is better clarity in the brain than PET. CT of chest/ab/pelvis will show location and size, but not the "glow" of uptake… aka… how strong the individual tumor activity is. If the docs know that your tumors are growing by reviewing your CT's, which I assume is the reason you are advancing to a study (yes? no? maybe so?) then the PET may not necessarily be of much additional benefit. That's not to say it is useless, as they could view the tumor activity before the trial and during/post trial… in the event that the tumor size isn't a clear indication of the new treatment's efficacy. Your local oncologist may like to have the info for his own files, even if the study docs don't find it necessary for their data.
-
- October 25, 2016 at 2:56 pm
MRI is better clarity in the brain than PET. CT of chest/ab/pelvis will show location and size, but not the "glow" of uptake… aka… how strong the individual tumor activity is. If the docs know that your tumors are growing by reviewing your CT's, which I assume is the reason you are advancing to a study (yes? no? maybe so?) then the PET may not necessarily be of much additional benefit. That's not to say it is useless, as they could view the tumor activity before the trial and during/post trial… in the event that the tumor size isn't a clear indication of the new treatment's efficacy. Your local oncologist may like to have the info for his own files, even if the study docs don't find it necessary for their data.
-
- October 25, 2016 at 2:56 pm
MRI is better clarity in the brain than PET. CT of chest/ab/pelvis will show location and size, but not the "glow" of uptake… aka… how strong the individual tumor activity is. If the docs know that your tumors are growing by reviewing your CT's, which I assume is the reason you are advancing to a study (yes? no? maybe so?) then the PET may not necessarily be of much additional benefit. That's not to say it is useless, as they could view the tumor activity before the trial and during/post trial… in the event that the tumor size isn't a clear indication of the new treatment's efficacy. Your local oncologist may like to have the info for his own files, even if the study docs don't find it necessary for their data.
-
- October 25, 2016 at 4:28 pm
Pleae make sure they are doing a MRI of your Brain, and not just your face. I am sure they are, but my Dad's original doc only did scan from neck down. Unfortunately , brain mets were not diagnosed until later and there were already 15 of them ๐
-
- October 25, 2016 at 4:28 pm
Pleae make sure they are doing a MRI of your Brain, and not just your face. I am sure they are, but my Dad's original doc only did scan from neck down. Unfortunately , brain mets were not diagnosed until later and there were already 15 of them ๐
-
- October 25, 2016 at 4:28 pm
Pleae make sure they are doing a MRI of your Brain, and not just your face. I am sure they are, but my Dad's original doc only did scan from neck down. Unfortunately , brain mets were not diagnosed until later and there were already 15 of them ๐
-
- October 26, 2016 at 1:44 am
Cancersnewnormal, yes I went into the trial because the mel had progressed to my brain, lungs, liver, adrenal gland and gall bladder. So it looked like time to jump on something real quick. Was very fortunate because Yale New Haven and Sloane Kettering were the only hospitals with the trial.
-
- October 26, 2016 at 1:44 am
Cancersnewnormal, yes I went into the trial because the mel had progressed to my brain, lungs, liver, adrenal gland and gall bladder. So it looked like time to jump on something real quick. Was very fortunate because Yale New Haven and Sloane Kettering were the only hospitals with the trial.
-
- October 26, 2016 at 1:44 am
Cancersnewnormal, yes I went into the trial because the mel had progressed to my brain, lungs, liver, adrenal gland and gall bladder. So it looked like time to jump on something real quick. Was very fortunate because Yale New Haven and Sloane Kettering were the only hospitals with the trial.
-
- October 26, 2016 at 1:20 pm
Dude… you have been through the ringer! Are the trial docs asking that you have any brain metastasis under control prior first? It sounds like you have had a long road of experience in just a couple of years! Hopefully this new treatment can bring you some turnabout. Best wishes! Keep us updated. : )
-
- October 26, 2016 at 1:20 pm
Dude… you have been through the ringer! Are the trial docs asking that you have any brain metastasis under control prior first? It sounds like you have had a long road of experience in just a couple of years! Hopefully this new treatment can bring you some turnabout. Best wishes! Keep us updated. : )
-
- October 26, 2016 at 1:20 pm
Dude… you have been through the ringer! Are the trial docs asking that you have any brain metastasis under control prior first? It sounds like you have had a long road of experience in just a couple of years! Hopefully this new treatment can bring you some turnabout. Best wishes! Keep us updated. : )
-
- October 26, 2016 at 1:27 pm
John,
Like others have already said most trials do CTs because they are interested in getting the closet measurements they can of the disease. Just wanted to let you know during my two year trial there was at least once and maybe twice where I was able to get a PET outside of the trial because we wanted to get information the CT was unable to provide.
Good luck to you. What trial are you doing?
Brian
-
- October 26, 2016 at 1:27 pm
John,
Like others have already said most trials do CTs because they are interested in getting the closet measurements they can of the disease. Just wanted to let you know during my two year trial there was at least once and maybe twice where I was able to get a PET outside of the trial because we wanted to get information the CT was unable to provide.
Good luck to you. What trial are you doing?
Brian
-
- October 26, 2016 at 1:27 pm
John,
Like others have already said most trials do CTs because they are interested in getting the closet measurements they can of the disease. Just wanted to let you know during my two year trial there was at least once and maybe twice where I was able to get a PET outside of the trial because we wanted to get information the CT was unable to provide.
Good luck to you. What trial are you doing?
Brian
-
- October 27, 2016 at 1:17 pm
Hello all – I was in the initial ippi / nivo combo trial. Yes I had one brain met at start of trial that had to be Cyber Knifed first. About 4 months into trial I had two more brain mets Cyber Knifed. Even though I am four years NED, I will never be considered a responder or even a partial responder in the trial.
-
- October 27, 2016 at 1:17 pm
Hello all – I was in the initial ippi / nivo combo trial. Yes I had one brain met at start of trial that had to be Cyber Knifed first. About 4 months into trial I had two more brain mets Cyber Knifed. Even though I am four years NED, I will never be considered a responder or even a partial responder in the trial.
-
- October 27, 2016 at 1:17 pm
Hello all – I was in the initial ippi / nivo combo trial. Yes I had one brain met at start of trial that had to be Cyber Knifed first. About 4 months into trial I had two more brain mets Cyber Knifed. Even though I am four years NED, I will never be considered a responder or even a partial responder in the trial.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.