› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Necrosis on PET/CT Bad or Good ???
- This topic has 18 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 9 months ago by susanr.
- Post
-
- June 30, 2012 at 10:34 pm
Hello Everyone,
Hello Everyone,
I see many posts re: PET/CT scans. Many of the posts reveal necrosis within many organs. I see some post Brain, liver, lung, etc. My brother just had his PET/CT this week and had necrosis at the center of a left pelvic mass along with some nodes containing necrosis. Had yervoy 12/2011, just finished Temodor and Abraxane. Some comments I hear that it can be a good sign, bad sign, or no significance. Any comments to help offer some in- sight. Doctor did not even comment on this but I see so many of us post this ? Thanks so much…!!!!!!
Susan R. NY
- Replies
-
-
- July 1, 2012 at 12:30 am
Necrosis means dead tissue – totally inactive. I can't see anything other than it being a good sign as long as you're referring to melanoma tumors. Certainly you wouldn't want to see it in healthy tissue, but it's a desirable trait in tumors!
-
- July 1, 2012 at 8:17 pm
Here is what I was told concerning the necrotic center of a tumor ( was on no treatment at the time, and was told the mass was still growing): one doc said we have absolutely no idea what it means. Another doc explained it is not good or bad, often times it mans the tumor has outgrown the blood supply it is attached to, in other words the blood supply can’t support the entire tumor mass anymore. We chose to take it as a good sign! My most recent scan last week didn’t mention the necrotic tissue but did show tumor shrinkage due to Zelboraf. Best of luck to you! -
- July 2, 2012 at 1:57 am
I really appreciate your post. This is why I posted this. So many conflicting feed back from docs.
I am glad you had this report from Zelboraf. Very Happy you are a responder. Best of luck to you also. Keep us posted on your treatment……..
thank you !!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
- July 2, 2012 at 1:57 am
I really appreciate your post. This is why I posted this. So many conflicting feed back from docs.
I am glad you had this report from Zelboraf. Very Happy you are a responder. Best of luck to you also. Keep us posted on your treatment……..
thank you !!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
- July 2, 2012 at 1:57 am
I really appreciate your post. This is why I posted this. So many conflicting feed back from docs.
I am glad you had this report from Zelboraf. Very Happy you are a responder. Best of luck to you also. Keep us posted on your treatment……..
thank you !!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
- July 1, 2012 at 8:17 pm
Here is what I was told concerning the necrotic center of a tumor ( was on no treatment at the time, and was told the mass was still growing): one doc said we have absolutely no idea what it means. Another doc explained it is not good or bad, often times it mans the tumor has outgrown the blood supply it is attached to, in other words the blood supply can’t support the entire tumor mass anymore. We chose to take it as a good sign! My most recent scan last week didn’t mention the necrotic tissue but did show tumor shrinkage due to Zelboraf. Best of luck to you! -
- July 1, 2012 at 8:17 pm
Here is what I was told concerning the necrotic center of a tumor ( was on no treatment at the time, and was told the mass was still growing): one doc said we have absolutely no idea what it means. Another doc explained it is not good or bad, often times it mans the tumor has outgrown the blood supply it is attached to, in other words the blood supply can’t support the entire tumor mass anymore. We chose to take it as a good sign! My most recent scan last week didn’t mention the necrotic tissue but did show tumor shrinkage due to Zelboraf. Best of luck to you!
-
- July 8, 2012 at 6:20 am
My tumor by my superior vena cava was 6.8 cent. at the widest area and it was also partially necrotic when they removed it. The surgeon at Mayo said this was due to the previous radiation. It still had living cells but part of the melanoma was damaged by the radiation and died…unless its totally necrotic it has the potential to grow and travel to other parts of the body.
-
- July 8, 2012 at 6:20 am
My tumor by my superior vena cava was 6.8 cent. at the widest area and it was also partially necrotic when they removed it. The surgeon at Mayo said this was due to the previous radiation. It still had living cells but part of the melanoma was damaged by the radiation and died…unless its totally necrotic it has the potential to grow and travel to other parts of the body.
-
- July 8, 2012 at 6:20 am
My tumor by my superior vena cava was 6.8 cent. at the widest area and it was also partially necrotic when they removed it. The surgeon at Mayo said this was due to the previous radiation. It still had living cells but part of the melanoma was damaged by the radiation and died…unless its totally necrotic it has the potential to grow and travel to other parts of the body.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.