› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Bone lesion
- This topic has 12 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 4 months ago by paul Lyons.
- Post
-
- November 26, 2013 at 1:21 pm
Hello,
Last week I had an MRI arthrogram of my hip because of intermittent mechanical pain in my posteriolateral hip for abot 3 months (it was not getting worse with time, I would say even improved). An orthopaedic doctor I saw did X-ray (which was normal) and ordered MRI with contrast to rule out the labral tear. Well, MRI showed extensive labral tear but it also revealed a bone lesion 3.0 x 2.8 x 3.3 cm in acetabulum of my ischum bone with fluid fluid layers,"likely aneurysmal bone cyst",
Because of my melanoma history (Stage 1, 9 years post diagnosis), I am besides myself with worry. I made an appointment with an orthopaedic oncologist at MGH who deals with benign and malignant tumors and I assume they will do a biopsy of this lesion. How bad is bone biopsy? Did anyone have an MRI suggestive of cyst that later turned out to be a metastasis???
- Replies
-
-
- November 26, 2013 at 1:43 pm
Hi, it is definitely appropriate to diligently follow-up on this–as you are doing. I was Stage I 10 years ago and am now Stage IV. I was diagnosed in July 2013 with a heavy and aggressive tumor burden and, therefore, limited treatment options (so far, so good on current treatment). However, the first "sign" that I had was severe left arm pain, which first occurred in early January. Given the passage of time, I never even suspected melanoma or any anything serious for that matter. I assumed my pain was as a result of carrying around my 4 year old or from typing, etc. I didn't have my arm x-rayed, etc. Turns out that it was a bone lesion. Now, to be clear, my situation is atypical and my intent is not to increase your worry. Rather, it is to validate your vigilence. (Note: I did not have a bone biopsy, so I can't speak to that.)
-
- November 26, 2013 at 1:43 pm
Hi, it is definitely appropriate to diligently follow-up on this–as you are doing. I was Stage I 10 years ago and am now Stage IV. I was diagnosed in July 2013 with a heavy and aggressive tumor burden and, therefore, limited treatment options (so far, so good on current treatment). However, the first "sign" that I had was severe left arm pain, which first occurred in early January. Given the passage of time, I never even suspected melanoma or any anything serious for that matter. I assumed my pain was as a result of carrying around my 4 year old or from typing, etc. I didn't have my arm x-rayed, etc. Turns out that it was a bone lesion. Now, to be clear, my situation is atypical and my intent is not to increase your worry. Rather, it is to validate your vigilence. (Note: I did not have a bone biopsy, so I can't speak to that.)
-
- November 26, 2013 at 1:43 pm
Hi, it is definitely appropriate to diligently follow-up on this–as you are doing. I was Stage I 10 years ago and am now Stage IV. I was diagnosed in July 2013 with a heavy and aggressive tumor burden and, therefore, limited treatment options (so far, so good on current treatment). However, the first "sign" that I had was severe left arm pain, which first occurred in early January. Given the passage of time, I never even suspected melanoma or any anything serious for that matter. I assumed my pain was as a result of carrying around my 4 year old or from typing, etc. I didn't have my arm x-rayed, etc. Turns out that it was a bone lesion. Now, to be clear, my situation is atypical and my intent is not to increase your worry. Rather, it is to validate your vigilence. (Note: I did not have a bone biopsy, so I can't speak to that.)
-
- November 26, 2013 at 1:57 pm
A fluid filled lesion on the bone is not likely to be a melanoma tumor. If the radiologist thought it had malignancy potential, the wording would have said just that: "Suspicious for malignancy". Sometimes, things are exactly what they seem. Certainly doesn't hurt to check it out, but don't jump to conclusions.
-
- November 26, 2013 at 1:57 pm
A fluid filled lesion on the bone is not likely to be a melanoma tumor. If the radiologist thought it had malignancy potential, the wording would have said just that: "Suspicious for malignancy". Sometimes, things are exactly what they seem. Certainly doesn't hurt to check it out, but don't jump to conclusions.
-
- November 26, 2013 at 1:57 pm
A fluid filled lesion on the bone is not likely to be a melanoma tumor. If the radiologist thought it had malignancy potential, the wording would have said just that: "Suspicious for malignancy". Sometimes, things are exactly what they seem. Certainly doesn't hurt to check it out, but don't jump to conclusions.
-
- November 26, 2013 at 2:22 pm
I agree with both Mat and Janner. A fluid-filled cyst looks very different on an MRI than does a solid tumor like melanoma. You most probably have a cyst. But Mat is right, too. With a history of melanoma, it's always best to get weird things checked out. Relax and have a wonderful Thanksgiving!
-
- November 26, 2013 at 2:22 pm
I agree with both Mat and Janner. A fluid-filled cyst looks very different on an MRI than does a solid tumor like melanoma. You most probably have a cyst. But Mat is right, too. With a history of melanoma, it's always best to get weird things checked out. Relax and have a wonderful Thanksgiving!
-
- November 26, 2013 at 2:22 pm
I agree with both Mat and Janner. A fluid-filled cyst looks very different on an MRI than does a solid tumor like melanoma. You most probably have a cyst. But Mat is right, too. With a history of melanoma, it's always best to get weird things checked out. Relax and have a wonderful Thanksgiving!
-
- November 26, 2013 at 11:52 pm
Hello.
I recently had a bone biopsy. It's a simple procedure, generally.. It was sore at the biopsy site for a few days with no residual pain a few weeks out.
Best of luck,
Paul
-
- November 26, 2013 at 11:52 pm
Hello.
I recently had a bone biopsy. It's a simple procedure, generally.. It was sore at the biopsy site for a few days with no residual pain a few weeks out.
Best of luck,
Paul
-
- November 26, 2013 at 11:52 pm
Hello.
I recently had a bone biopsy. It's a simple procedure, generally.. It was sore at the biopsy site for a few days with no residual pain a few weeks out.
Best of luck,
Paul
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.