LV

Oh Linda, this just sucks, there's no other way to say it.

It does sound like you have a fantastic team on your side, and I -we ALL- are pulling for you!

Laura

Oh Linda, this just sucks, there's no other way to say it.

It does sound like you have a fantastic team on your side, and I -we ALL- are pulling for you!

Laura

Oh Linda, this just sucks, there's no other way to say it.

It does sound like you have a fantastic team on your side, and I -we ALL- are pulling for you!

Laura

Very nice. But not the issue.

You were still wrong about the timeline.

Very nice. But not the issue.

You were still wrong about the timeline.

Very nice. But not the issue.

You were still wrong about the timeline.

You were wrong then, you are still wrong on the time line. In fact, the only thing that was clearly shown was that your posts came hours after mine.

Unlike you, I had no idea (and still don't) who Miss Kitty or Raven or whoever was or is, nor did I care. I saw someone expressing their pain, and being in a vulnerable place myself, responded to that. Then, for some reason, you felt compelled to scold MK and whoever else in that thread for showing vulnerablility. Not sure why you even had a dog in that fight – someone's love loss bothers you enough to tell them to get over it? After that, you were too intent on defending your interpretation of things, your image of being always right, too intent on telling me how wrong I was, to ever acknowledge how it might have come across. To ever say 'whoa, I can see how you thought that, based on the timeline, but that was not my intention.'

I didn't have to make certain I remembered. It was such an eye opener that I could hardly forget. I don't need to portray you in any light; I think we all stand here on our own power. So be it.

You were wrong then, you are still wrong on the time line. In fact, the only thing that was clearly shown was that your posts came hours after mine.

Unlike you, I had no idea (and still don't) who Miss Kitty or Raven or whoever was or is, nor did I care. I saw someone expressing their pain, and being in a vulnerable place myself, responded to that. Then, for some reason, you felt compelled to scold MK and whoever else in that thread for showing vulnerablility. Not sure why you even had a dog in that fight – someone's love loss bothers you enough to tell them to get over it? After that, you were too intent on defending your interpretation of things, your image of being always right, too intent on telling me how wrong I was, to ever acknowledge how it might have come across. To ever say 'whoa, I can see how you thought that, based on the timeline, but that was not my intention.'

I didn't have to make certain I remembered. It was such an eye opener that I could hardly forget. I don't need to portray you in any light; I think we all stand here on our own power. So be it.

You were wrong then, you are still wrong on the time line. In fact, the only thing that was clearly shown was that your posts came hours after mine.

Unlike you, I had no idea (and still don't) who Miss Kitty or Raven or whoever was or is, nor did I care. I saw someone expressing their pain, and being in a vulnerable place myself, responded to that. Then, for some reason, you felt compelled to scold MK and whoever else in that thread for showing vulnerablility. Not sure why you even had a dog in that fight – someone's love loss bothers you enough to tell them to get over it? After that, you were too intent on defending your interpretation of things, your image of being always right, too intent on telling me how wrong I was, to ever acknowledge how it might have come across. To ever say 'whoa, I can see how you thought that, based on the timeline, but that was not my intention.'

I didn't have to make certain I remembered. It was such an eye opener that I could hardly forget. I don't need to portray you in any light; I think we all stand here on our own power. So be it.

Whoa, now we're castrating new patients? Is this a job for John's new van? Is it to prevent them from passing along possible genetic mutations? New therapy?

Still, way harsh.

Whoa, now we're castrating new patients? Is this a job for John's new van? Is it to prevent them from passing along possible genetic mutations? New therapy?

Still, way harsh.

Whoa, now we're castrating new patients? Is this a job for John's new van? Is it to prevent them from passing along possible genetic mutations? New therapy?

Still, way harsh.

Oh, it's nothing to do with religion, or BG, or the wind.

I think you know full well where my beef with you comes from. That old bit of nastiness that you would never own. Of course, it probably meant more to me, as a then-new widow being told to get over myself, than to you you, for whom it was just another opportunity to look sharp, another feather in your cap of clever, no matter whose bird you had to pluck to get it. Sure, you're Miss Empathy to the new and fearful, 'oh darling let me hold your hand', but not quite so dear to those farther along, 'please, don't stand so close – your bad luck might be contagious.'  So vain, so shallow, so fearful, so willing to use anyone to make yourself look sharp, at least in your own mind.

Expect you to take responsibility for others' poor choices? Absolutely not. You won't even take responsibility for your own, so I find this hilariously ironic.

No, I don't mind sharing my opposing opinions. Not sure what you mean by that, but by the way, just because you oppose them doesn't make them invalid.  But that's a whole other thread.

Oh, it's nothing to do with religion, or BG, or the wind.

I think you know full well where my beef with you comes from. That old bit of nastiness that you would never own. Of course, it probably meant more to me, as a then-new widow being told to get over myself, than to you you, for whom it was just another opportunity to look sharp, another feather in your cap of clever, no matter whose bird you had to pluck to get it. Sure, you're Miss Empathy to the new and fearful, 'oh darling let me hold your hand', but not quite so dear to those farther along, 'please, don't stand so close – your bad luck might be contagious.'  So vain, so shallow, so fearful, so willing to use anyone to make yourself look sharp, at least in your own mind.

Expect you to take responsibility for others' poor choices? Absolutely not. You won't even take responsibility for your own, so I find this hilariously ironic.

No, I don't mind sharing my opposing opinions. Not sure what you mean by that, but by the way, just because you oppose them doesn't make them invalid.  But that's a whole other thread.

Oh, it's nothing to do with religion, or BG, or the wind.

I think you know full well where my beef with you comes from. That old bit of nastiness that you would never own. Of course, it probably meant more to me, as a then-new widow being told to get over myself, than to you you, for whom it was just another opportunity to look sharp, another feather in your cap of clever, no matter whose bird you had to pluck to get it. Sure, you're Miss Empathy to the new and fearful, 'oh darling let me hold your hand', but not quite so dear to those farther along, 'please, don't stand so close – your bad luck might be contagious.'  So vain, so shallow, so fearful, so willing to use anyone to make yourself look sharp, at least in your own mind.

Expect you to take responsibility for others' poor choices? Absolutely not. You won't even take responsibility for your own, so I find this hilariously ironic.

No, I don't mind sharing my opposing opinions. Not sure what you mean by that, but by the way, just because you oppose them doesn't make them invalid.  But that's a whole other thread.