The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

WBR vs. SRS – I would so appreciate your input

Forums Cutaneous Melanoma Community WBR vs. SRS – I would so appreciate your input

  • Post
    dmarie
    Participant

      This forum has been a phenomenal source of information and I so appreciate your knowledge and experience. I am trying to help my husband make some really important treatment decisions, so I am hoping that some of you who have experience with brain mets who have had either WBR and/or SRS will give me some insight. 

      My husband (49 years old) feels better than he has in years. He is eating well – fish, eggs, veggies, no processed food or sugars. He's been going to the gym. He is disappointed that he hasn't lost any weight, but he feels and looks really good. And, I suppose, therein lies the conundrum. His disease appears to be progressing. Taf/Mek seems to have stopped working. The radiation oncologist saw him a few days ago and said, "you look so much better than your scans would indicate." (Thanks??) He is completely asymptomatic, and returned to work full time a week or so after surgery in August. He is an IT Systems Analyst, so focus and analytical thought is really important to him, and working is also very important to him, and he is good at what he does.

      Anyway, as you can see by the following chronology, this is all relative new, and he's only been on one treatment plan so far. And Taflinar / Mekinist seem to have been working for 4 months or so. Until they seem to have stopped working.

      August 23, 2017 – craniotomy to remove tumor (largest, causing aphresia; 12 smaller lesions remaining in brain)

      August 25 – diagnosis, metastic melanoma

      September 23 – start Taflinar & Mekinist

      November 14 – Follow up CT scans and brain MRI showed tumor reduction in many sites, and some reduction of brain mets, but possibly 6 new lesions in the brain. And 1st we've heard of tumors in bone (femur and illium).

      November 15 – met w/ radiation oncologist to discuss GK surgery. He reviewed scans, and thinks "new" lesions "could be" bleeds, rather than new tumors. Brian opted to be re-scaned in 6 weeks and see where we are.

      December 20 – results of scan are inconclusive. Some mets have reduced; but several new lesions, scatted all over the brain. Recommended WBR, rather than GK. Brian opted to 'watch and wait' and re-scan in 6 weeks. 

      January 31 – now radiation oncologist is "concerned" as several tumors have grown in size. We were not told the number. (I am guessing that there are +-20 currently, but only a guess). He is recommending WBR, (non-hippocampus sparing), as soon as possible. Medical oncologist wants other CTs done as soon as possible to monitor progression of other sites (lungs, liver, lymphnodes, bones, pericardium, etc.) The idea being that if Brian is having radiation tx for the brain, he can have other sites 'zapped' at the same time – not sure how this works. 

      We are really concerned with cognitive impairment caused by necrosis with WBR, and, from what I've read, would prefer SRS in concert with immunotherapy. I don't know what the oncologists' recommendation is for drug therapy at this time. It was not discussed at the 1/31 visit. I have read many journal articles, blog sites, Cancer Commons, this forum's offerings, and Celeste's blog, (amazing work! THANK YOU!!!!) It is all so informative, but really overwhelming. 

      Is our concern (fear) of cognitive impairment valid? Is SRS better tolerated? Are the effects of one less harmful than the other? What questions should I be asking the docs? Is it possible to push for SRS over WBR when radiation oncologist wants to do WBR? 

      Compounding this situation is that he was laid off from his job effective February 1, and has interviews lined up in the coming weeks. He wants to put off radiation until he finds a job. The recommendation from the doctor is to get radiation done before the job search. I heard the urgency in the doctor's message. I don't think Brian did, however. He is of the mindset that rushing into things is not necessarily the right course, and that we should have time to digest all of this and make well educated decisions. He is also of the mindset that diet is the key, and "cancer can't live in an alkaline environment" and "sugar feeds cancer". (While I am sure that a good, healthy diet is ideal, eating salad is not going to cure him). I am assuming that these little buggers (tumors) are not on his timetable and are growing as fast as they can, with the intention to kill him. (I do think that my husband is in some denial about all of this – given that he does feel good, etc., and who wouldn't be?? Who wants to deal with any of this??)

      Thank you so much for reading. I look forward to any and all responses. Diane

    Viewing 7 reply threads
    • Replies
        Bubbles
        Participant

          Oh my goodness, Diane.  ASAP is what I feel I should say first!!!  Making sure your husband is being seen by a melanoma specialist, second.  And – ipi/nivo….which is the immunotherapy combo that gets the best results, third…but…immunotherapy takes time…so back to ASAP!!!!

          Yes, I think that if there is still a question about the femur, etc…additional scans are needed…also ASAP!!!  But, mostly…whether brain and/or elsewhere…a systemic therapy that is working!!  And yes…immunotherapy works in both the brain and body. Targeted therapy can be incredibly effective.  However, melanoma is very sinister and can develop tumor work-around.  Sadly, this happens in most melanoma patients at about the 6-9 month mark.

          Here are a zillion reports on brain mets (this post has links within): 

          http://chaoticallypreciselifeloveandmelanoma.blogspot.com/2017/10/melanoma-brain-mets-things-are-getting.html  

          Overall, though there are those who have done it for various reasons….WBR is not very effective in melanoma.  SRS or gamma knife are much preferred and there are those here who have had brain mets that number in the teens done in one go.  Additionally, it can be done sequentially if need be.   

          No, sugar intake is not going to affect your husband's melanoma one way or the other.  He needs effective treatment NOW!  This shit don't play.  I understand feeling well and the incredible disconnect you feel when your doc and scans tell you about the horror that is going on in your body.  However, everyday you let melanoma have its way…the harder it is to get a hold on it's pervasive nature.  It sounds as though you are doing all you can to encourage your husband to attain the care he needs.  Hang in there.  Ask more questions should you have the need.  I wish you both my best.  Celeste

            dmarie
            Participant

              Thank you, very much, for replying. He is being seen by a mel specialist, so we feel that we have options available to us. However, at our visit last week specifics were not discussed as to what treatment options were being considered as the next step. I assume ipi/nivo, but that is purely speculative. I assume that the melanoma doc will recommend, rather than us asking for a treatment option – is that correct? 

              I plan to talk to either the radiation oncologist or his medical oncologist (mel specialist) tomorrow and ask a bunch of questions. (I have a list, and hope I am asking the right ones! I will re-read your post again and see what I am missing.) They had wanted to start WBR this week, but we hadn't scheduled anything yet, so I know I will be speaking with someone tomorrow. I just hope that we can get everone to agree that SRS is the way to go, and that this is, actually, the right decision for him. 

              Thank you, Celeste. I know you have heard this a thousand times, but your advice and efforts to educate are amazing. I have gotten a lot of strength from you. I hope you and your family have a wonderful year…

               

            AshleyS
            Participant

              Listen to Celeste – she’s the pro. He very well may tolerate radiation/treatment well and interview throughout the process. I stayed home with my two kids and finished grad school while on treatment. 

              Best of luck,

              Ashley

              Mat
              Participant

                Celeste has given you great advice.  As someone who has had brain tumors (and is also a "knowledge worker"), I would personally seek out every alternative before WBR and would (and do) view WBR as the last and least preferred option.

                ed williams
                Participant

                  Hi Diane, just to add to what has been already given, here are two links!!! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X5xGQpdp9OA and a second from MD Anderson, https://www.mdanderson.org/newsroom/2017/06/two-combination-therapies-shrink-melanoma-brain-metastases.html  Just a thought, try to get your husband on the forum if possible!!! There is data out there as well on SRS vs whole brain radiation and cognitive effects. Best Wishes!!!Ed

                  sister of patient
                  Participant

                    Hi Diane – As everyone else has already said – please listen to Celeste – the time to act is ASAP!!!!

                    I'll tell you a bit about my sister – she had a clear brain MRI in Jan. 2016 but had multi-organ and bone mets – went on Taf/Mek combo in Feb. but couldn't tolerate it and even though it seemed to "melt" away her mets, she was still progressing. By May she had developed brain mets – more than could be counted. Luckily that same month, she started Ipi/Nivo combo infusions – had two before brain mets were discovered. In her case, she had too many mets for any kind of SRS and had no choice but to undergo WBR. (We fought like crazy for SRS – went to a top-notch US neuro-radio-oncologist who also concurred that WBR was the only option).

                    She had the max rads they could give and yep, there's a small amount of permanent damage but NOTHING that does not allow her to live a normal life. She's a teacher and went back to work last Sept. Basically, her short term memory was affected but it was no more than little things like walking into a room and forgetting what she went for – starting to say something and then missing a word. This seemed to peak at around a year after WBR and then got better. She coped with it by writing lots of little notes to herself, post-its, etc. … A year and half later now and there's barely any sign – she doesn't "miss a beat."

                    I say "luckily" she had two combo infusions before the radiation because, received in close proximity ("in concert" as you've said and Celeste's material makes very clear) seems to be the most effective treatment. After a course of hi-dose steroids following the WBR, my sister went on Nivo-only infusions and is now NED. Without both treatments, I don't believe she would've made it.

                    If it was me, I would be pressing the docs for this kind of treatment – even one combo infusion before the radiation (and definitely SRS if possible) and then back on to immunotherapy asap after that.

                    As for your husband's belief in diet is "everything" – I have a friend just diagnosed with breast cancer – it's her 2nd cancer (already a lung cancer survivor) – she has always eaten really well, has great energy, she looks like a million bucks for her age and after her 1st cancer, she "doubled down" on her "healthy diet" (no sugar, lots of salads, the right amounts of everything – proteins, carbs, etc….)  Now she's in absolute disbelief and feeling quite betrayed … wondering how this could have possibly happened to her …

                    I sincerely hope this helps and I wish you and Brian the best possible outcomes!!!!

                    Barb

                     

                    adriana cooper
                    Participant

                      Diane, I echo Celeste and Barb. A couple things, first make sure radiation oncologist and melanoma oncologist are talking to each other and are on the same page and in agreement. Sometimes the various departments say they are in communication but they really are not. Ask radiation oncologist specifically why WBRT over GK. I would not necessarily accept number as being a reason. In Adriana's case it was the size and location of her three mets that was the issue and GK being more prone to short term swelling which had the potential to stop her heart and lungs. My understanding that WBRT is a one time (although several sessions) deal but you can have GK  multiple times if necessary (although not the same spots I think?? even after WBRT we were told.) As Barb noted WBRT does work for some and doesn't necessarily mean the end of your brain so do it if there is good reason. 

                      Above all please don't wait.

                      I say ASAP GK and some immuno therapy as close together as they will let you (they will probably recommend a couple days break between them, don't accept weeks of time between them without really good reasoning such as indication of brain bleed, etc.) 

                      Drs. know a lot (most assuredly more than most of us, well maybe except Celeste :->) but they have a lot of patients and honestly aren't always up on everything. Be tough with them. Your husbands life doesn't mean more to anyone except he and you. Sorry if this sounds bad on my part, I don't mean it to. 

                      Barb, Thanks for sharing that success story of your sister I am so happy for her.

                      Rob

                        sister of patient
                        Participant

                          Thank you Rob!! I feel I have to speak up when WBR is mentioned – it's not what we ever wanted but, ultimately, was the only option and it did its job. BUT without the immuno as well, I think we would've had an entirely different outcome. Wishing you well!!!!

                          Barb

                        marta010
                        Participant

                          HI Diane – my husband has had 2 crainiotomies and 5 gamma knife procedures over the past 6 years  I would STONGLY urge you not to delay in pursuing treatment for his brain mets.  I completely understand the concerns about cognitive impairment associated with the treatment options – my husband experienced radiation necrosis and brain edema several times and has bounced back to full brain strength (and more!) after each incident.  Recovery from cognitive issues is a short term proposition….not treating the brain mets will eventually have catastrophic consequences with no recovery.  I hate to put it in such dire terms but watching and waiting is the WORST approach for his situation.  Put the job interviews on hold and pursue the appropriate treatment(s).  I can't comment personally on the WBR vs GK as my husband only had one met treatated at a time with GK so we didn't have to consider WBR.  I know that research has shown that WBR is not very effective for melanoma – Celeste has provided much information on this topic and I have nothing to add.  Please, please, please – do whatever it takes to convince him to act aggressively in getting treatment.  

                          Ann

                          dmarie
                          Participant

                            2/5 pm – follow up:  Thank you all. Wow. I am humbled by your passion, compassion, knowledge and experience. Today has been really busy – he and I had a hard conversation, and I shared all that I have learned and how I feel about this. He has agreed to put the job search on hold until this is all sorted out – hopefully a positive solution. I spoke with his medical oncologist (melanoma specialist), and he was able to answer many of my questions. I am now waiting to hear from the radiation oncologist, so that I can get more clariity on the remaining questions. These are specific to number and location of mets in his brain, timing of immunotherapy (or other systemic therapy), and if SRS could be done over two sessions if necessary. 

                            The med onc did mention that the rad onc is fearful that LMD is a possible factor. Ugh.(I didn't need to hear that. Enough is enough).

                            I was able to get him onboard to have the body scans done as well, so that we will know exactly where he stands with everything else as well.

                            Again, thank you all for your input. It was all so valuable. Brian really values this – personal experience – over the doctors' recommendations. Your responses helped me to convince him of the necessity of expedience. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Diane

                        Viewing 7 reply threads
                        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                        About the MRF Patient Forum

                        The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                        The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                        Popular Topics