› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Wait t
- This topic has 30 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 11 months ago by
_Paul_.
- Post
-
- April 9, 2015 at 3:53 am
I found this link and wondered what others thought of it. I went to U of M. It took me a total of 3 months to get my wide excision and node biopsy, then a partial node removal. I often wonder if surgical intervention quicker would have made a difference in the status of my node. Of course, they said it wouldn't when I asked them. Just seems like an extraordinary amount of time to wait when you are dealing with Melanoma. Thoughts anyone? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/04/08/1376427/-Yale-study-reveals-melanoma-surgery-delays-more-common-for-Medicare-patients?detail=facebook_sf. I am not on Medicare and have private insurance.
- Replies
-
-
- April 9, 2015 at 1:19 pm
That is a heck of a long time to wait.
I am in Australia and I have private insurance and it took me about 10 days.
They always say it is better to get in early and there must be a time when it is only on the surface and not spread to lymph nodes yet so i reckon three months could be quite costly but you are never really going to know.
-
- April 9, 2015 at 1:19 pm
That is a heck of a long time to wait.
I am in Australia and I have private insurance and it took me about 10 days.
They always say it is better to get in early and there must be a time when it is only on the surface and not spread to lymph nodes yet so i reckon three months could be quite costly but you are never really going to know.
-
- April 9, 2015 at 1:19 pm
That is a heck of a long time to wait.
I am in Australia and I have private insurance and it took me about 10 days.
They always say it is better to get in early and there must be a time when it is only on the surface and not spread to lymph nodes yet so i reckon three months could be quite costly but you are never really going to know.
-
- April 9, 2015 at 2:05 pm
Hopy crap. 3 months is a long time. I had to wait what I thought was a ridiculously long 3 weeks after my diagnosis for my WLE and SNB. After I switched to a melanoma specialist, I remember asking what the recommended time was between diagnosis and excision, and she said within one month.
Mine was nodular melanoma, maybe the answer would have been different for superficial spreading.
Are you beeing seen my an oncologist specializing in melanoma? That is very important.
-
- April 9, 2015 at 2:05 pm
Hopy crap. 3 months is a long time. I had to wait what I thought was a ridiculously long 3 weeks after my diagnosis for my WLE and SNB. After I switched to a melanoma specialist, I remember asking what the recommended time was between diagnosis and excision, and she said within one month.
Mine was nodular melanoma, maybe the answer would have been different for superficial spreading.
Are you beeing seen my an oncologist specializing in melanoma? That is very important.
-
- April 9, 2015 at 2:05 pm
Hopy crap. 3 months is a long time. I had to wait what I thought was a ridiculously long 3 weeks after my diagnosis for my WLE and SNB. After I switched to a melanoma specialist, I remember asking what the recommended time was between diagnosis and excision, and she said within one month.
Mine was nodular melanoma, maybe the answer would have been different for superficial spreading.
Are you beeing seen my an oncologist specializing in melanoma? That is very important.
-
- April 9, 2015 at 11:00 pm
Melanoma not only can travel through the lymph system but also travels in the blood. I had a negative SNB and all clear in my WLE which was 3 weeks after the original diagnosis. In less than 2 years it was in my liver, lungs and more on the original site.
-
- April 9, 2015 at 11:00 pm
Melanoma not only can travel through the lymph system but also travels in the blood. I had a negative SNB and all clear in my WLE which was 3 weeks after the original diagnosis. In less than 2 years it was in my liver, lungs and more on the original site.
-
- April 10, 2015 at 11:35 am
Is this scientifically accurate? That all melanoma patients have melanoma cells in the bloodstream and the only thing preventing metastasis is immune system? Are there scientific studies that show/prove this to be true that can be shared, I've never seen/read this before? I find this hard to believe if the 20 year survival rate of early/thin stage I is 96% (Queensland study of over 26,000 patients). Melanoma is in the blood of 100% of patients but survival rate is still that high? Seems contradictory.
-
- April 10, 2015 at 11:35 am
Is this scientifically accurate? That all melanoma patients have melanoma cells in the bloodstream and the only thing preventing metastasis is immune system? Are there scientific studies that show/prove this to be true that can be shared, I've never seen/read this before? I find this hard to believe if the 20 year survival rate of early/thin stage I is 96% (Queensland study of over 26,000 patients). Melanoma is in the blood of 100% of patients but survival rate is still that high? Seems contradictory.
-
- April 11, 2015 at 3:54 pm
My understanding is that Stage 0/in situ lesions do not yet connect to the vascular and lymphatic systems because they are confined to the epidermal layer- thus virtually no potential for invasive disease. Stage 1 theoretically has the *potential* to spread into vascular and lymphatic systems just by virtue of depth of the lesion, but that doesn't mean it is in everyone's blood.
-
- April 11, 2015 at 3:54 pm
My understanding is that Stage 0/in situ lesions do not yet connect to the vascular and lymphatic systems because they are confined to the epidermal layer- thus virtually no potential for invasive disease. Stage 1 theoretically has the *potential* to spread into vascular and lymphatic systems just by virtue of depth of the lesion, but that doesn't mean it is in everyone's blood.
-
- April 11, 2015 at 8:58 pm
I have discussed this with more than one melanoma onc. At the time I was stage 3, Snd they both said something to the effect of: to advance to stage 4 meant it was no longer just in my lymphatic system but had made it into the blood. So my belief is that it is bunk.
-
- April 11, 2015 at 8:58 pm
I have discussed this with more than one melanoma onc. At the time I was stage 3, Snd they both said something to the effect of: to advance to stage 4 meant it was no longer just in my lymphatic system but had made it into the blood. So my belief is that it is bunk.
-
- April 11, 2015 at 8:58 pm
I have discussed this with more than one melanoma onc. At the time I was stage 3, Snd they both said something to the effect of: to advance to stage 4 meant it was no longer just in my lymphatic system but had made it into the blood. So my belief is that it is bunk.
-
- April 11, 2015 at 3:54 pm
My understanding is that Stage 0/in situ lesions do not yet connect to the vascular and lymphatic systems because they are confined to the epidermal layer- thus virtually no potential for invasive disease. Stage 1 theoretically has the *potential* to spread into vascular and lymphatic systems just by virtue of depth of the lesion, but that doesn't mean it is in everyone's blood.
-
- April 10, 2015 at 11:35 am
Is this scientifically accurate? That all melanoma patients have melanoma cells in the bloodstream and the only thing preventing metastasis is immune system? Are there scientific studies that show/prove this to be true that can be shared, I've never seen/read this before? I find this hard to believe if the 20 year survival rate of early/thin stage I is 96% (Queensland study of over 26,000 patients). Melanoma is in the blood of 100% of patients but survival rate is still that high? Seems contradictory.
-
- April 9, 2015 at 11:00 pm
Melanoma not only can travel through the lymph system but also travels in the blood. I had a negative SNB and all clear in my WLE which was 3 weeks after the original diagnosis. In less than 2 years it was in my liver, lungs and more on the original site.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.