› Forums › Cutaneous Melanoma Community › Treatment dropped due to progression…looking for new treatment
- This topic has 38 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by EricNJill.
- Post
-
- October 19, 2010 at 7:34 pm
Due to progression and complications during our stay for a 2nd dose of Intralymphatic Vaccine, we are stopping treatment and searching for something new. This was at the advice of professionals. Eric has tested positive for BRAF and they are encouraging we find a trial for BRAF but since all Eric's tumors are either vascular and sub-cutaneous we are concerned about the return of melanoma after the 8-9 months with doing PLX4032.
He's done the following treatments:
HD Interferon & LD Interferon
Due to progression and complications during our stay for a 2nd dose of Intralymphatic Vaccine, we are stopping treatment and searching for something new. This was at the advice of professionals. Eric has tested positive for BRAF and they are encouraging we find a trial for BRAF but since all Eric's tumors are either vascular and sub-cutaneous we are concerned about the return of melanoma after the 8-9 months with doing PLX4032.
He's done the following treatments:
HD Interferon & LD Interferon
Clinical Trial of Abraxane, Avastin & Carboplatin
HD IL-2 (44 doses)
Clinical Trial – Dendric Cell Vaccine
Clinical Trial – Intralymphatic Vaccine
Does anyone have advice on what our next step should be?
Thanks, Jill & Eric in OH
- Replies
-
-
- October 19, 2010 at 7:48 pm
I am starting the BRAF trial on November 1st. I am hoping for longer than 8-9 months of tumor shrinkage.
Hopefully by that time, Ipi will be approved by the FDA and we can get regular dosage of that drug without being on a clinical trial or getting compassionate use. So Ipi is my plan B,
I dont know that much about these other clinical trials but these are some other ones I was looking at as a Plan C,D,E…
Dinaciclib in Treating Patients With Stage IV Melanoma
NCT ID: NCT00937937 Combination of Decitabine and Temozolomide in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
NCT ID: NCT00715793 Efficacy and Safety Study of OncoVEXGM-CSF Compared to GM-CSF in Melanoma
NCT ID: NCT00769704 Study of ALT-801 With Cisplatin in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
NCT ID: NCT01029873 – Must be HLA-A2 Positive
Good luck with your search.
Bill
-
- October 19, 2010 at 7:48 pm
I am starting the BRAF trial on November 1st. I am hoping for longer than 8-9 months of tumor shrinkage.
Hopefully by that time, Ipi will be approved by the FDA and we can get regular dosage of that drug without being on a clinical trial or getting compassionate use. So Ipi is my plan B,
I dont know that much about these other clinical trials but these are some other ones I was looking at as a Plan C,D,E…
Dinaciclib in Treating Patients With Stage IV Melanoma
NCT ID: NCT00937937 Combination of Decitabine and Temozolomide in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
NCT ID: NCT00715793 Efficacy and Safety Study of OncoVEXGM-CSF Compared to GM-CSF in Melanoma
NCT ID: NCT00769704 Study of ALT-801 With Cisplatin in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
NCT ID: NCT01029873 – Must be HLA-A2 Positive
Good luck with your search.
Bill
-
- October 19, 2010 at 8:10 pm
Hi Jill
Given the same options I would do the BRAF first to give me the time to get my body in good shape for the next possible treatment. Right now he's an excellent candidate for BRAF, there is a possibliity that may change if he waits.
There are new treatments in the pipeline and 8-9 months could make a difference.
It's only my 2 cents worth I can only tell you what I would do.
Jerry from Cape Cod
-
- October 19, 2010 at 8:10 pm
Hi Jill
Given the same options I would do the BRAF first to give me the time to get my body in good shape for the next possible treatment. Right now he's an excellent candidate for BRAF, there is a possibliity that may change if he waits.
There are new treatments in the pipeline and 8-9 months could make a difference.
It's only my 2 cents worth I can only tell you what I would do.
Jerry from Cape Cod
-
- October 20, 2010 at 5:48 pm
Hi Jill,
It would make good sense to look at both a targeted treatment (assuming he is positive for the V600e mutation) as well as a systemic one for Eric. One major issue with the Roche Trial is ramdomization, at least IMHO. An alternative BRAF trial (Phase III, no ramdomization) is NCT01037127, which a number of people on this board are doing:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01037127?term=gsk+mek&rank=5
The targeted therapies seem to help with significant short term tumor reduction, which might be the best alternative for Eric right now, due to his large tumor burden. The systemic approach (i.e. Compassionate Use Ipilimumab) could then become Plan B. If he does not have the V600e, then Ipi could be Plan A.
This is from one who has weighed the simlar decisions carefully. Hope that helps a little, and best wishes to you both.
Best,
Jim
-
- October 20, 2010 at 7:40 pm
Jim,
He is BRAF V600E positive. I was looking at the trial on that link. Is this a radomized trial? It looked like someone would get the inhibitor and maybe some won't. I'm not real good at reading those things so I could be reading it wrong.
Thanks, Jill
-
- October 20, 2010 at 8:17 pm
Perhaps this trial since it has the best of two worlds…Dose-escalation Study of Combination BMS-936558 (MDX-1106) and Ipilimumab in Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Malignant Melanoma
it's IPI and MDX 1106.,,http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01024231?term=MDX+1106+and+MDX+010&rank=1
Or Perhaps
Dose-escalation Study of Combination BMS-936558 (MDX-1106) and Ipilimumab in Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Malignant Melanoma –http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01024231?term=MDX+1106&rank=5I am stage 4 NED and currently doing " Monoclonal Antibody Therapy and Vaccine Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage IV Melanoma That Has Been Removed By Surgery" http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01176474?term=MDX+1106&rank=6Oct 26th will be my 7th month of NEDHope this helps a little…so many choices-Lynn -
- October 20, 2010 at 8:17 pm
Perhaps this trial since it has the best of two worlds…Dose-escalation Study of Combination BMS-936558 (MDX-1106) and Ipilimumab in Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Malignant Melanoma
it's IPI and MDX 1106.,,http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01024231?term=MDX+1106+and+MDX+010&rank=1
Or Perhaps
Dose-escalation Study of Combination BMS-936558 (MDX-1106) and Ipilimumab in Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Malignant Melanoma –http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01024231?term=MDX+1106&rank=5I am stage 4 NED and currently doing " Monoclonal Antibody Therapy and Vaccine Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage IV Melanoma That Has Been Removed By Surgery" http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01176474?term=MDX+1106&rank=6Oct 26th will be my 7th month of NEDHope this helps a little…so many choices-Lynn -
- October 20, 2010 at 9:04 pm
Hi Jill,
the trial I referenced is a Phase II Trial, none of which are randomized. Only Phase III trials are ramdomized. This is Glaxo's version ot the BRAF inhibitor that Roche is testing, but it is called a MEK inhibitor. Please do not let the terminology confuse you. If Eric has the v600e, then he is eligible, although Glaxo may want to do their own test and not accept another test. See if there is a Site near you – maybe in the Pittsburgh area (you ar near there as I recall).
Ther are Ipi combination trials going on, as the next poster points out. We can discuss the options in more detail if you would like, on or off the board. Or you can look at the Clinicaltrials.gov website.
Best,
Jim
-
- October 20, 2010 at 9:04 pm
Hi Jill,
the trial I referenced is a Phase II Trial, none of which are randomized. Only Phase III trials are ramdomized. This is Glaxo's version ot the BRAF inhibitor that Roche is testing, but it is called a MEK inhibitor. Please do not let the terminology confuse you. If Eric has the v600e, then he is eligible, although Glaxo may want to do their own test and not accept another test. See if there is a Site near you – maybe in the Pittsburgh area (you ar near there as I recall).
Ther are Ipi combination trials going on, as the next poster points out. We can discuss the options in more detail if you would like, on or off the board. Or you can look at the Clinicaltrials.gov website.
Best,
Jim
-
- October 20, 2010 at 11:34 pm
Hi Jim,
Thank you for that information. I looked at the trial again and that is definitely something we will look into. We actually live in Ohio, but have been traveling with Angel Flight to Pittsburgh. So either the Philadelphia location or the Tennessee location might work for us.
I also am looking into the IPI and MDX1106 trial.
I looked into Cisplatin, but Eric's Onc said that since he did a trial of Abraxane, Avastin & Carboplatin it wouldn't make sence to do Cisplatin because it's part of the Carboplatin family.
I really appreciate everyone's help. Thank you for taking the time to reply to my post.
Jill n Eric in OH
-
- October 21, 2010 at 12:29 am
Hey Jill and Eric! I am a buckeye too! Born and raised in Tuscarawas County! (Currently hubby and I are living in North Dakota)…soon to move to Florida!)
I am curious if Eric had a lot of sunburns growing up in Ohio…I had egg looking yellow blisters on my shoulders and neck from swimming lessons as a kid. Mine started like a flat freckle on my neck..who would have thought it would end up being this now…! Good luck with your decision…it's always tough because once you do choose one treatment the chances are great it will knock you out of the others…I worry about that – you know- just incase it comes back…here are 4 immunotherapies you can look at!
Tremelimumab and CP-870,893 in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
Phase I Oncovir Poly IC:LC and NY-ESO-1/gp100/MART
Lynn
-
- October 21, 2010 at 12:29 am
Hey Jill and Eric! I am a buckeye too! Born and raised in Tuscarawas County! (Currently hubby and I are living in North Dakota)…soon to move to Florida!)
I am curious if Eric had a lot of sunburns growing up in Ohio…I had egg looking yellow blisters on my shoulders and neck from swimming lessons as a kid. Mine started like a flat freckle on my neck..who would have thought it would end up being this now…! Good luck with your decision…it's always tough because once you do choose one treatment the chances are great it will knock you out of the others…I worry about that – you know- just incase it comes back…here are 4 immunotherapies you can look at!
Tremelimumab and CP-870,893 in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
Phase I Oncovir Poly IC:LC and NY-ESO-1/gp100/MART
Lynn
-
- October 21, 2010 at 12:33 am
Hi Jill,
Glad id I can help in a some small way. I should point out that the MDX 1106 trial mentioned above is a Phase I trial, so it should be evaluated accordingly. The combination of MDX 010 (aka Ipilimumab) and MDX 1006 does look interesting, however. I am currently enrolled in a trial of Ipi and Temazolomide, and one of those who think that Ipi combinations, as well BRAF or MEK combinations, hold promise and expect to see more of those kind of trials, hopefully sooner rather than later.
Best wishes to you and Eric.
Jim
-
- October 21, 2010 at 12:33 am
Hi Jill,
Glad id I can help in a some small way. I should point out that the MDX 1106 trial mentioned above is a Phase I trial, so it should be evaluated accordingly. The combination of MDX 010 (aka Ipilimumab) and MDX 1006 does look interesting, however. I am currently enrolled in a trial of Ipi and Temazolomide, and one of those who think that Ipi combinations, as well BRAF or MEK combinations, hold promise and expect to see more of those kind of trials, hopefully sooner rather than later.
Best wishes to you and Eric.
Jim
-
- October 21, 2010 at 12:52 am
Temazolomide (Temodar) lasted from my radiation in July 09 to Feb 2010. Bought me time! I am thinking if all the trials and drugs give me so many months I could last til old age. My old onc at Mayo said I was lucky because it usually stops after 3 or 4 months. I have heard people with brain mets have been on Temazolomide for years and years and doing fine! Ted Kennedy was on it . Great success with your trial!!
-
- October 21, 2010 at 12:52 am
Temazolomide (Temodar) lasted from my radiation in July 09 to Feb 2010. Bought me time! I am thinking if all the trials and drugs give me so many months I could last til old age. My old onc at Mayo said I was lucky because it usually stops after 3 or 4 months. I have heard people with brain mets have been on Temazolomide for years and years and doing fine! Ted Kennedy was on it . Great success with your trial!!
-
- October 21, 2010 at 1:06 am
Hi Again!
So the IPI and MDX 1006 being Phase One is that a bad thing? I don't really understand this stuff. Here was my thinking with this trial. We can get compassionate use of IPI but when I saw it with another drug I thought that it would be best to go with the combination than just IPI alone. I also wasn't sure if the IPI compassionate use would be covered by our insurance so I was thinking if we got into the trial for the combination it would be covered.
Am I thinking right?
-
- October 21, 2010 at 1:06 am
Hi Again!
So the IPI and MDX 1006 being Phase One is that a bad thing? I don't really understand this stuff. Here was my thinking with this trial. We can get compassionate use of IPI but when I saw it with another drug I thought that it would be best to go with the combination than just IPI alone. I also wasn't sure if the IPI compassionate use would be covered by our insurance so I was thinking if we got into the trial for the combination it would be covered.
Am I thinking right?
-
- October 21, 2010 at 7:44 pm
Hi Jill,
You need to contact the hospital site or sites that is/are involved in the particular trial (in this case, Yale or MSK in NYC) and ask them if they are accepting new participants. Do not assume that the info on the Clinicaltrials.gov website is accurate, because sometimes it is not regarding openings. Second, try to determine if all eligibility criteria will be met to be entered in the particular trial. So before you get too focused on a particular trial, figure out if you (Eric) is eligible and that there is a slot available first.
Your point about the MDX 1006 is valid, and it does look like a promising combination. Phase I trial are to determine dosages, so participants are more of a gineua pig than at Phase II trial, but that may not seem like much of an issue until you see the disclaimers the legal papers that must be signed to enroll. If that trial is your first choice, please make sure to do your homework on that trial as well as check out other options to pursue if your first choice does not work out. Of course, if you ask for opinions here or elsewhere (as opposed to facts), you will certainly get them, but that may not be as helpful as you would like. There is no substitute for becoming educated yourself, even though you might prefer th rely on other people's knowledge and/or opinions.
Regarding insurance, the cost clincal trials that do not involve FDA approved medications are covered by the sponsor(s). MDX refers to Medarex, whihc is now owned by Bristol Meyers (BMY). BMY covers the cost, including screenings, etc. If you prefer to contact your carrier to verify that angle, then please do that after you know which trial Eric will be enrolling in. Typically the study nurse at the hospital will help you with insurance so that you know if you have any cost before beginning the trial. Last, "compassionate use" Ipi should not cost you for the trial itself, and would still seem to be an option to consider, even if it would be Plan B or C.
You are asking good questions, but please do not make assumptions and do verify any information you get on this board – including from me!
Best Wishes,
Jim
-
- October 21, 2010 at 7:44 pm
Hi Jill,
You need to contact the hospital site or sites that is/are involved in the particular trial (in this case, Yale or MSK in NYC) and ask them if they are accepting new participants. Do not assume that the info on the Clinicaltrials.gov website is accurate, because sometimes it is not regarding openings. Second, try to determine if all eligibility criteria will be met to be entered in the particular trial. So before you get too focused on a particular trial, figure out if you (Eric) is eligible and that there is a slot available first.
Your point about the MDX 1006 is valid, and it does look like a promising combination. Phase I trial are to determine dosages, so participants are more of a gineua pig than at Phase II trial, but that may not seem like much of an issue until you see the disclaimers the legal papers that must be signed to enroll. If that trial is your first choice, please make sure to do your homework on that trial as well as check out other options to pursue if your first choice does not work out. Of course, if you ask for opinions here or elsewhere (as opposed to facts), you will certainly get them, but that may not be as helpful as you would like. There is no substitute for becoming educated yourself, even though you might prefer th rely on other people's knowledge and/or opinions.
Regarding insurance, the cost clincal trials that do not involve FDA approved medications are covered by the sponsor(s). MDX refers to Medarex, whihc is now owned by Bristol Meyers (BMY). BMY covers the cost, including screenings, etc. If you prefer to contact your carrier to verify that angle, then please do that after you know which trial Eric will be enrolling in. Typically the study nurse at the hospital will help you with insurance so that you know if you have any cost before beginning the trial. Last, "compassionate use" Ipi should not cost you for the trial itself, and would still seem to be an option to consider, even if it would be Plan B or C.
You are asking good questions, but please do not make assumptions and do verify any information you get on this board – including from me!
Best Wishes,
Jim
-
- October 21, 2010 at 10:00 pm
Yes My trial is covered by the trial but my insurance had to pay for the initial scans and initial dr visit. Once accepted into the trial every thing is covered. They say if it's a standard treatment that I would normally happen outside of the trial insurance would be responsible.
-
- October 21, 2010 at 10:00 pm
Yes My trial is covered by the trial but my insurance had to pay for the initial scans and initial dr visit. Once accepted into the trial every thing is covered. They say if it's a standard treatment that I would normally happen outside of the trial insurance would be responsible.
-
- October 21, 2010 at 10:07 pm
Thank you all for your help. I did contact MSK and it looks like the trial is full. They said it's on hold and they have a large waiting list so I got the impression that it would be full so know I'm looking at the GSK MEK Inhibitor Trial. Is that similar to the BRAF PLX4032 drug?
I always thought I was a pretty smart gal but when I look at these clinical trials I get so overwhelmed. I really wish I understood these better because I feel like I could help him more if I really understood them. I called Nashville because they had the phase 2 trail for the BRAF GSK MEK inhibitor, but the lady was trying to get me into a GSK Phase 1 trial. I was so confused.
-
- October 22, 2010 at 12:00 am
Hi Jill
Generally Phase 1 is trialing the drug where sometimes phase 2 is the Trial Drug or placebo. She probably wants to make sure you get the drug. Ask her if this is the case.
best wishes
James
-
- October 22, 2010 at 12:00 am
Hi Jill
Generally Phase 1 is trialing the drug where sometimes phase 2 is the Trial Drug or placebo. She probably wants to make sure you get the drug. Ask her if this is the case.
best wishes
James
-
- October 21, 2010 at 10:07 pm
Thank you all for your help. I did contact MSK and it looks like the trial is full. They said it's on hold and they have a large waiting list so I got the impression that it would be full so know I'm looking at the GSK MEK Inhibitor Trial. Is that similar to the BRAF PLX4032 drug?
I always thought I was a pretty smart gal but when I look at these clinical trials I get so overwhelmed. I really wish I understood these better because I feel like I could help him more if I really understood them. I called Nashville because they had the phase 2 trail for the BRAF GSK MEK inhibitor, but the lady was trying to get me into a GSK Phase 1 trial. I was so confused.
-
- October 20, 2010 at 11:34 pm
Hi Jim,
Thank you for that information. I looked at the trial again and that is definitely something we will look into. We actually live in Ohio, but have been traveling with Angel Flight to Pittsburgh. So either the Philadelphia location or the Tennessee location might work for us.
I also am looking into the IPI and MDX1106 trial.
I looked into Cisplatin, but Eric's Onc said that since he did a trial of Abraxane, Avastin & Carboplatin it wouldn't make sence to do Cisplatin because it's part of the Carboplatin family.
I really appreciate everyone's help. Thank you for taking the time to reply to my post.
Jill n Eric in OH
-
- October 20, 2010 at 7:40 pm
Jim,
He is BRAF V600E positive. I was looking at the trial on that link. Is this a radomized trial? It looked like someone would get the inhibitor and maybe some won't. I'm not real good at reading those things so I could be reading it wrong.
Thanks, Jill
-
- October 20, 2010 at 5:48 pm
Hi Jill,
It would make good sense to look at both a targeted treatment (assuming he is positive for the V600e mutation) as well as a systemic one for Eric. One major issue with the Roche Trial is ramdomization, at least IMHO. An alternative BRAF trial (Phase III, no ramdomization) is NCT01037127, which a number of people on this board are doing:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01037127?term=gsk+mek&rank=5
The targeted therapies seem to help with significant short term tumor reduction, which might be the best alternative for Eric right now, due to his large tumor burden. The systemic approach (i.e. Compassionate Use Ipilimumab) could then become Plan B. If he does not have the V600e, then Ipi could be Plan A.
This is from one who has weighed the simlar decisions carefully. Hope that helps a little, and best wishes to you both.
Best,
Jim
-
- October 22, 2010 at 1:27 am
Hi-Try Nashville Sara Cannon – they have alot of new targeted trials. My brother is having great success there- he goes there every three weeks from Florida- but it has saved his life so far on B-raf inhibitor – GSK. The place is so very positive and amazing. I wish Eric and you best of luck – we felt hopeless 9 months ago. Just FYI- my brother was a Braf-K type — even though they were looking for a different Braf – I think V- it still has been a miracle! Keep looking -don't ever give up.
Best wishes
MrsMarilyn
-
- October 23, 2010 at 12:12 am
Mrs. Marilyn. Thank you so much for your post. We actually did check there and sent over Eric's file yesterday. They called me this morning and are going to have someone call us to set up an appointment. Do you know the name of the doctor your brother is seeing? I'd love to learn more about your brother, if you don't mind. You can email me at [email protected].
Thank YOU!
-
- October 23, 2010 at 12:12 am
Mrs. Marilyn. Thank you so much for your post. We actually did check there and sent over Eric's file yesterday. They called me this morning and are going to have someone call us to set up an appointment. Do you know the name of the doctor your brother is seeing? I'd love to learn more about your brother, if you don't mind. You can email me at [email protected].
Thank YOU!
-
- October 22, 2010 at 1:27 am
Hi-Try Nashville Sara Cannon – they have alot of new targeted trials. My brother is having great success there- he goes there every three weeks from Florida- but it has saved his life so far on B-raf inhibitor – GSK. The place is so very positive and amazing. I wish Eric and you best of luck – we felt hopeless 9 months ago. Just FYI- my brother was a Braf-K type — even though they were looking for a different Braf – I think V- it still has been a miracle! Keep looking -don't ever give up.
Best wishes
MrsMarilyn
-
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.