› Forums › General Melanoma Community › SNLB
- This topic has 3 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 7 years, 6 months ago by jennunicorn.
- Post
-
- October 13, 2016 at 12:16 am
I'm second guessing some things tonight or overthinking maybe but for stage 1a .40 thick clarks level 2 no ulceration.. should I have had a SNLB? All I had was a WLE. Just wondering.
- Replies
-
-
- October 13, 2016 at 2:45 am
No, the standard of care is to do a SLNB for 1.00mm or larger and is considered sometimes for 0.75-1.00mm if other things such as ulceration are present. You can't have a SLNB after getting the WLE anyway, there is no way to go back and do that, so no worries, you took the right steps.
-
- October 13, 2016 at 2:45 am
No, the standard of care is to do a SLNB for 1.00mm or larger and is considered sometimes for 0.75-1.00mm if other things such as ulceration are present. You can't have a SLNB after getting the WLE anyway, there is no way to go back and do that, so no worries, you took the right steps.
-
- October 13, 2016 at 2:45 am
No, the standard of care is to do a SLNB for 1.00mm or larger and is considered sometimes for 0.75-1.00mm if other things such as ulceration are present. You can't have a SLNB after getting the WLE anyway, there is no way to go back and do that, so no worries, you took the right steps.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.