The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Pregnancy after Melanoma?

Forums General Melanoma Community Pregnancy after Melanoma?

  • Post
    dennest
    Participant

    Hello,

    I was diagnosed back in April with a stage 1 melanoma. My site was .35mm. I had a wide excision and no further treatment. I know that I was incredibly lucky to have caught it so early, but now that some time has gone by, I feel like I should have done more even though further treatment is not recommended.

    Hello,

    I was diagnosed back in April with a stage 1 melanoma. My site was .35mm. I had a wide excision and no further treatment. I know that I was incredibly lucky to have caught it so early, but now that some time has gone by, I feel like I should have done more even though further treatment is not recommended.

    My husband and I are looking to have another child, and I am finding it extremely hard to decide if we should proceed with our family plan. Of course most doctors say we should wait for at least two years before getting pregnant. Has anyone had a similar experience with this? If so, how long did you wait, did your pregnancy go well, and did you have any recurrances, etc?

    Thank you.

     DEnnest

    Loading spinner
Viewing 15 reply threads
  • Replies
      Ranisa
      Participant

      I am in the same boat….only a little farther down the river…I guess is how I would put it.  I had stage 1b in late July.  Surgery for WLE and SNB….one lymph node came back with "something".  Forwarded slides onto Mayo… pathologist sayed regular mole cells.  Wanted a baby.  I was in my OB office in July asking what I needed to do to prepare to get pregnant.  12 day later I found that mole really was cancer.  In October I moved and was given the okay to get pregnant after seeing my new derm and then got the verbal okay from the new onocolgist.  Then I went to see the onocologist and he said that my orginal dx was more aggressive than I was lead to belive or even what he thought it was when he gave me the verbal okay to get pregnant.  The mitotic index was a 3, and there was a focal extension of melanoma cells near a vascular structure.  With that he would not have given me the okay.  Well…..that was a little late.  I had my IUD out and got pregnant all within 2 weeks of the verbal okay.  He asked if I would give him permission to request and have my lymph node slides forwarded onto want he called the best lab to have a 3rd opinion on it.  I just got the call last Friday, GREAT NEWS!  The orginal dx of regular mole cells was correct.  Which keeps me at a stage 1b and not a stage 3a.  I am seeing my dermatolgist and oncologist every 6 weeks.  I havne't seen either one since getting the results back from the 3rd opinion on those 4 cells.  I will be followed closely and my OB seems fine with everything.  I will giving permission to all 3 of the doctors to communicate with each other freely and often.  I don't want to be the middle man and get something lost in translation. 

      From my understand early stages don't need to wait.  Later stages need to be NED for 2-3 years.  My advice, having been down this road…and still doing it right now.  MAKE SURE THAT YOU SEE A MELANOMA SPECIALIST!  NOT JUST SOMEONE WHO DEALS WITH IT BUT A SPECIALIST. Get the docs opinion and go from there. It does make a difference A BIG DIFFERENCE.  I have seen both kind of doctors…..I can tell you I feel the difference when I am in the office and when they are talking to me about things.  Let me know if you want to talk over the phone or something sometime.  I'd enjoy it.  Forgive my spelling….it really is the least of my worries right now.

      Loading spinner
        dennest
        Participant

        Thank you so much for getting back to me and telling me your story. Congratulations on your pregnancy and I'm so glad to here that everything is going well so far!  Your experience is definetly reassuring to me and I am taking your advice to seek out a melanoma specialist. I will definetly keep you posted, and please update me on how you're doing as well.

        Thanks again!

        –Dennest

        Loading spinner
        dennest
        Participant

        Thank you so much for getting back to me and telling me your story. Congratulations on your pregnancy and I'm so glad to here that everything is going well so far!  Your experience is definetly reassuring to me and I am taking your advice to seek out a melanoma specialist. I will definetly keep you posted, and please update me on how you're doing as well.

        Thanks again!

        –Dennest

        Loading spinner
      Ranisa
      Participant

      I am in the same boat….only a little farther down the river…I guess is how I would put it.  I had stage 1b in late July.  Surgery for WLE and SNB….one lymph node came back with "something".  Forwarded slides onto Mayo… pathologist sayed regular mole cells.  Wanted a baby.  I was in my OB office in July asking what I needed to do to prepare to get pregnant.  12 day later I found that mole really was cancer.  In October I moved and was given the okay to get pregnant after seeing my new derm and then got the verbal okay from the new onocolgist.  Then I went to see the onocologist and he said that my orginal dx was more aggressive than I was lead to belive or even what he thought it was when he gave me the verbal okay to get pregnant.  The mitotic index was a 3, and there was a focal extension of melanoma cells near a vascular structure.  With that he would not have given me the okay.  Well…..that was a little late.  I had my IUD out and got pregnant all within 2 weeks of the verbal okay.  He asked if I would give him permission to request and have my lymph node slides forwarded onto want he called the best lab to have a 3rd opinion on it.  I just got the call last Friday, GREAT NEWS!  The orginal dx of regular mole cells was correct.  Which keeps me at a stage 1b and not a stage 3a.  I am seeing my dermatolgist and oncologist every 6 weeks.  I havne't seen either one since getting the results back from the 3rd opinion on those 4 cells.  I will be followed closely and my OB seems fine with everything.  I will giving permission to all 3 of the doctors to communicate with each other freely and often.  I don't want to be the middle man and get something lost in translation. 

      From my understand early stages don't need to wait.  Later stages need to be NED for 2-3 years.  My advice, having been down this road…and still doing it right now.  MAKE SURE THAT YOU SEE A MELANOMA SPECIALIST!  NOT JUST SOMEONE WHO DEALS WITH IT BUT A SPECIALIST. Get the docs opinion and go from there. It does make a difference A BIG DIFFERENCE.  I have seen both kind of doctors…..I can tell you I feel the difference when I am in the office and when they are talking to me about things.  Let me know if you want to talk over the phone or something sometime.  I'd enjoy it.  Forgive my spelling….it really is the least of my worries right now.

      Loading spinner
      Ranisa
      Participant

      I am in the same boat….only a little farther down the river…I guess is how I would put it.  I had stage 1b in late July.  Surgery for WLE and SNB….one lymph node came back with "something".  Forwarded slides onto Mayo… pathologist sayed regular mole cells.  Wanted a baby.  I was in my OB office in July asking what I needed to do to prepare to get pregnant.  12 day later I found that mole really was cancer.  In October I moved and was given the okay to get pregnant after seeing my new derm and then got the verbal okay from the new onocolgist.  Then I went to see the onocologist and he said that my orginal dx was more aggressive than I was lead to belive or even what he thought it was when he gave me the verbal okay to get pregnant.  The mitotic index was a 3, and there was a focal extension of melanoma cells near a vascular structure.  With that he would not have given me the okay.  Well…..that was a little late.  I had my IUD out and got pregnant all within 2 weeks of the verbal okay.  He asked if I would give him permission to request and have my lymph node slides forwarded onto want he called the best lab to have a 3rd opinion on it.  I just got the call last Friday, GREAT NEWS!  The orginal dx of regular mole cells was correct.  Which keeps me at a stage 1b and not a stage 3a.  I am seeing my dermatolgist and oncologist every 6 weeks.  I havne't seen either one since getting the results back from the 3rd opinion on those 4 cells.  I will be followed closely and my OB seems fine with everything.  I will giving permission to all 3 of the doctors to communicate with each other freely and often.  I don't want to be the middle man and get something lost in translation. 

      From my understand early stages don't need to wait.  Later stages need to be NED for 2-3 years.  My advice, having been down this road…and still doing it right now.  MAKE SURE THAT YOU SEE A MELANOMA SPECIALIST!  NOT JUST SOMEONE WHO DEALS WITH IT BUT A SPECIALIST. Get the docs opinion and go from there. It does make a difference A BIG DIFFERENCE.  I have seen both kind of doctors…..I can tell you I feel the difference when I am in the office and when they are talking to me about things.  Let me know if you want to talk over the phone or something sometime.  I'd enjoy it.  Forgive my spelling….it really is the least of my worries right now.

      Loading spinner
      Ranisa
      Participant

      I am in the same boat….only a little farther down the river…I guess is how I would put it.  I had stage 1b in late July.  Surgery for WLE and SNB….one lymph node came back with "something".  Forwarded slides onto Mayo… pathologist sayed regular mole cells.  Wanted a baby.  I was in my OB office in July asking what I needed to do to prepare to get pregnant.  12 day later I found that mole really was cancer.  In October I moved and was given the okay to get pregnant after seeing my new derm and then got the verbal okay from the new onocolgist.  Then I went to see the onocologist and he said that my orginal dx was more aggressive than I was lead to belive or even what he thought it was when he gave me the verbal okay to get pregnant.  The mitotic index was a 3, and there was a focal extension of melanoma cells near a vascular structure.  With that he would not have given me the okay.  Well…..that was a little late.  I had my IUD out and got pregnant all within 2 weeks of the verbal okay.  He asked if I would give him permission to request and have my lymph node slides forwarded onto want he called the best lab to have a 3rd opinion on it.  I just got the call last Friday, GREAT NEWS!  The orginal dx of regular mole cells was correct.  Which keeps me at a stage 1b and not a stage 3a.  I am seeing my dermatolgist and oncologist every 6 weeks.  I havne't seen either one since getting the results back from the 3rd opinion on those 4 cells.  I will be followed closely and my OB seems fine with everything.  I will giving permission to all 3 of the doctors to communicate with each other freely and often.  I don't want to be the middle man and get something lost in translation. 

      From my understand early stages don't need to wait.  Later stages need to be NED for 2-3 years.  My advice, having been down this road…and still doing it right now.  MAKE SURE THAT YOU SEE A MELANOMA SPECIALIST!  NOT JUST SOMEONE WHO DEALS WITH IT BUT A SPECIALIST. Get the docs opinion and go from there. It does make a difference A BIG DIFFERENCE.  I have seen both kind of doctors…..I can tell you I feel the difference when I am in the office and when they are talking to me about things.  Let me know if you want to talk over the phone or something sometime.  I'd enjoy it.  Forgive my spelling….it really is the least of my worries right now.

      Loading spinner
      dian in spokane
      Participant

      Someone  recently posted a link to a 2009 study on pregnancy and melanoma. It's a subject that comes up here often, so I saved it. I hope you find it enlightening.

      dian

      http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090504210204.htm

      Loading spinner
        Ranisa
        Participant

        I had a 1.1 mm.  So yes it was over 1, but really only by .1…..makes it not sound so bad, at least to me.  I am curious as to what else you find out.  Keep me posted.  So far so good for me, I am 11 weeks along.

        Loading spinner
        Ranisa
        Participant

        I had a 1.1 mm.  So yes it was over 1, but really only by .1…..makes it not sound so bad, at least to me.  I am curious as to what else you find out.  Keep me posted.  So far so good for me, I am 11 weeks along.

        Loading spinner
        Ranisa
        Participant

        I had a 1.1 mm.  So yes it was over 1, but really only by .1…..makes it not sound so bad, at least to me.  I am curious as to what else you find out.  Keep me posted.  So far so good for me, I am 11 weeks along.

        Loading spinner
        Ranisa
        Participant

        I had a 1.1 mm.  So yes it was over 1, but really only by .1…..makes it not sound so bad, at least to me.  I am curious as to what else you find out.  Keep me posted.  So far so good for me, I am 11 weeks along.

        Loading spinner
        dennest
        Participant

        Thank you for the article…it was very helpful!! I appreciate all the feedback. Take care!!

        —Dennest

        Loading spinner
        dennest
        Participant

        Thank you for the article…it was very helpful!! I appreciate all the feedback. Take care!!

        —Dennest

        Loading spinner
      dian in spokane
      Participant

      Someone  recently posted a link to a 2009 study on pregnancy and melanoma. It's a subject that comes up here often, so I saved it. I hope you find it enlightening.

      dian

      http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090504210204.htm

      Loading spinner
      ErikaHouston2
      Participant

      I don't think you'd find a Dr. that would even offer you further treatment for a stage I. You did EXACTLY what you were supposed to do.

      I was diagnosed with Stage IA in Oct '08  (.65mm).  At the time of diagnosis I had a 6 month old.  My Dr's did not tell me to wait to get pregnant.

      I got pregnant in August of '09 and now have a beautiful 10 month old. Wouldn't change it for the world. I did go to the derm every 3 months during the pregnancy.

       You're very fortunate to have caught the melanoma so early. Get busy having another baby :-).

      Loading spinner
        Ranisa
        Participant

        I think the worry is that there was a vascular structure near the melanoma and the Mitotic index was higher than he would have liked to see.  My follow up care is to see Oncologist and Dermatologist rotating every 6 weeks. 

        I am going to try to post this one without having it end up as a double post!  ;o).  Thanks to everyone who has posted, I am loving that I will end with a baby at the end of this, but the morning sickness if ruff.

        Loading spinner
        Ranisa
        Participant

        I think the worry is that there was a vascular structure near the melanoma and the Mitotic index was higher than he would have liked to see.  My follow up care is to see Oncologist and Dermatologist rotating every 6 weeks. 

        I am going to try to post this one without having it end up as a double post!  ;o).  Thanks to everyone who has posted, I am loving that I will end with a baby at the end of this, but the morning sickness if ruff.

        Loading spinner
        Ranisa
        Participant

        I agree with Erica!  Sorry forgot to add this.  I am so flakey when pregnant. 

        Loading spinner
        Ranisa
        Participant

        I agree with Erica!  Sorry forgot to add this.  I am so flakey when pregnant. 

        Loading spinner
      ErikaHouston2
      Participant

      I don't think you'd find a Dr. that would even offer you further treatment for a stage I. You did EXACTLY what you were supposed to do.

      I was diagnosed with Stage IA in Oct '08  (.65mm).  At the time of diagnosis I had a 6 month old.  My Dr's did not tell me to wait to get pregnant.

      I got pregnant in August of '09 and now have a beautiful 10 month old. Wouldn't change it for the world. I did go to the derm every 3 months during the pregnancy.

       You're very fortunate to have caught the melanoma so early. Get busy having another baby :-).

      Loading spinner
      kab07011
      Participant

      Hi,

      I will give you a bite.

      My melanoma was dx in 9/09, WLE and SNB in 10/09 with clear nodes. Original site was lower back .97 breslow and ulcerated. I became pregnant 2 months after surgery in 01/10 and had no problems and delivered a healthy baby boy on 09/28/10. Still being seen every 4 months for total body checks.

      I would be happy to answer any other questions you may have. Definately live your life to the fullest at this stage you are not recommended to prevent or do anything different.

      Kim

      Loading spinner
      kab07011
      Participant

      Hi,

      I will give you a bite.

      My melanoma was dx in 9/09, WLE and SNB in 10/09 with clear nodes. Original site was lower back .97 breslow and ulcerated. I became pregnant 2 months after surgery in 01/10 and had no problems and delivered a healthy baby boy on 09/28/10. Still being seen every 4 months for total body checks.

      I would be happy to answer any other questions you may have. Definately live your life to the fullest at this stage you are not recommended to prevent or do anything different.

      Kim

      Loading spinner
      kab07011
      Participant

      Hi,

      I will give you a bite.

      My melanoma was dx in 9/09, WLE and SNB in 10/09 with clear nodes. Original site was lower back .97 breslow and ulcerated. I became pregnant 2 months after surgery in 01/10 and had no problems and delivered a healthy baby boy on 09/28/10. Still being seen every 4 months for total body checks.

      I would be happy to answer any other questions you may have. Definately live your life to the fullest at this stage you are not recommended to prevent or do anything different.

      Kim

      Loading spinner
        dennest
        Participant

        Thank you, thank you, thank you!!  Hearing your situation and progress is really giving me the boost I need to move on and keep my life going as planned! Good luck!! Thanks again.

        –Dennest

        Loading spinner
        dennest
        Participant

        Thank you, thank you, thank you!!  Hearing your situation and progress is really giving me the boost I need to move on and keep my life going as planned! Good luck!! Thanks again.

        –Dennest

        Loading spinner
      kab07011
      Participant

      Hi,

      I will give you a bite.

      My melanoma was dx in 9/09, WLE and SNB in 10/09 with clear nodes. Original site was lower back .97 breslow and ulcerated. I became pregnant 2 months after surgery in 01/10 and had no problems and delivered a healthy baby boy on 09/28/10. Still being seen every 4 months for total body checks.

      I would be happy to answer any other questions you may have. Definately live your life to the fullest at this stage you are not recommended to prevent or do anything different.

      Kim

      Loading spinner
      [email protected]
      Participant

      Hi, Dennest,

      I was diagnosed back in 1989. The melanoma was on my back. I had a wide excision to remove it with no other treatment. This happened six months before my wedding. My surgeon advised us to wait two years before becoming pregnant. We did exactly that. I went on to have three children. I am still seen regularly by a dermatologist.

       

      The best to you,

      Marian

      Loading spinner
      [email protected]
      Participant

      Hi, Dennest,

      I was diagnosed back in 1989. The melanoma was on my back. I had a wide excision to remove it with no other treatment. This happened six months before my wedding. My surgeon advised us to wait two years before becoming pregnant. We did exactly that. I went on to have three children. I am still seen regularly by a dermatologist.

       

      The best to you,

      Marian

      Loading spinner
      FertilityDoc
      Participant

      DEnnest,

      I have placed some information from the NIH below.  It is always a hard decision with imperfect data to guide us.  At stage 1 you might be okay but I would still discuss it with a melanoma specialist.  You have to take your own reproductive age into consideration.  If you are in your late 20's or early 30's you have time.  If you are in your mid thirties and beyond, you need to take overall fertility into consideration.

      Hope it helps,

      Kevin

       

      Should women who previously were diagnosed with
      melanoma avoid pregnancy?

      The issue here is whether pregnancy activates micrometastatic
      disease. There is no convincing evidence
      that pregnancy activates or stimulates dormant micrometastatic
      disease, although anecdotal case reports
      certainly suggest that this may happen in some cases. One
      of the difficulties in addressing this question is that it is
      impossible to know prospectively which patients are harboring
      micrometastases. One author noted similar fiveand
      ten-year survival rates for 115 patients who were
      pregnant with melanoma compared with 330 female
      melanoma patients who were never pregnant during or after
      their diagnosis.' The pregnant group, however, had a
      higher frequency of lymph node involvement at the time
      of diagnosis. A better survival was actually noted for 71
      patients who were pregnant within a year before or five
      years after a diagnosis of melanoma, but the control group
      consisted of only 31 women who did not get pregnant
      during a similar interval and who actually had higher
      stage disease.47 In another study, women diagnosed with
      melanoma before getting pregnant were compared with
      women diagnosed after completing all pregnancies.39 The
      latter group actually appeared to do worse at five years,
      although statistical comparison was not provided. In a retrospective
      study conducted at Duke University, 43
      women with stage I melanoma who became pregnant
      within the next five years had prognoses similar to those
      of 337 women who did not get pregnant, both in terms of
      relapse and disease-free survival.9
      There is no evidence that nulliparous women as a
      group differ from parous women as a group, in terms of
      prognosis from the time of a subsequent diagnosis of
      melanoma while pregnant. In a study that compared 85
      women diagnosed with melanoma before their first pregnancy
      with 143 women who had completed all pregnancies,
      melanoma developed in 68 between pregnancies and
      in 92 during pregnancy, and there was no difference in
      these groups.39 Two other small studies also found no difference
      in prognosis for nulliparous as opposed to parous
      women,4M42 although the studies were small in scope. The
      only trials that address the issue of the importance of subsequent
      pregnancy on prognosis have failed to identify
      parity as an important variable in multivariate analysis.39
      In the absence of definitive data, many authorities have
      recommended that women avoid pregnancy for two to
      five years after a diagnosis of melanoma, mainly because
      that is the time period during which most recurrences are
      diagnosed.'944149 In one study, such patients who did become
      pregnant were actually used as controls to compare
      with patients who were being diagnosed with melanoma
      for the first time while pregnant.37

      Should women who previously were diagnosed with
      melanoma during a pregnancy avoid subsequent pregnancy?
      Historically, there has been great concern regarding
      the risk of subsequent pregnancy in women who were initially
      diagnosed with melanoma during a previous pregnancy,
      based on the presumption that these melanomas in
      particular may be influenced adversely by growth factors
      and hormones secreted during pregnancy. Earlier observers
      felt strongly that pregnancy worsened the prognosis
      in this group of patients.2549 There is no objective
      evidence that this group is at higher risk with subsequent
      pregnancy, however. Despite this, the consensus is to recommend
      the deferral of subsequent pregnancy for two to
      three years in women in whom a primary melanoma developed
      during pregnancy.7

      Is there a risk of transplacental metastases to the fetus:?

      There definitely is a risk of transplacental transmission
      of melanoma from mother to fetus, but fortunately
      this risk is low.  Placental involvement itself is indicative
      of widespread hematogenous dissemination in the
      mother, but placental involvement does not necessarily
      mean that the newborn baby will have melanoma. Of 35
      cases of placental or fetal involvement with cancer following
      pregnancy, one study found that 11 were due to
      melanoma, the most common cancer associated with this
      phenomenon, followed by leukemia or lymphoma. Of
      the 11 melanoma patients, the placenta was involved in 7
      and the fetus in 6. Two of the infants with melanoma underwent
      spontaneous regression of disease after delivery.
      It has been suggested that only 25% of infants with placental
      metastatic melanoma will actually die of metastatic
      melanoma, and it is almost always manifest at the time
      of delivery and then fails to regress spontaneously after
      delivery. The implications of these observations are that
      women diagnosed with metastatic melanoma during
      pregnancy need not abort their fetus out of a fear of
      transplacental spread, and active therapy for a fetus born
      in the setting of placental metastases is not warranted. 

      Loading spinner
      FertilityDoc
      Participant

      DEnnest,

      I have placed some information from the NIH below.  It is always a hard decision with imperfect data to guide us.  At stage 1 you might be okay but I would still discuss it with a melanoma specialist.  You have to take your own reproductive age into consideration.  If you are in your late 20's or early 30's you have time.  If you are in your mid thirties and beyond, you need to take overall fertility into consideration.

      Hope it helps,

      Kevin

       

      Should women who previously were diagnosed with
      melanoma avoid pregnancy?

      The issue here is whether pregnancy activates micrometastatic
      disease. There is no convincing evidence
      that pregnancy activates or stimulates dormant micrometastatic
      disease, although anecdotal case reports
      certainly suggest that this may happen in some cases. One
      of the difficulties in addressing this question is that it is
      impossible to know prospectively which patients are harboring
      micrometastases. One author noted similar fiveand
      ten-year survival rates for 115 patients who were
      pregnant with melanoma compared with 330 female
      melanoma patients who were never pregnant during or after
      their diagnosis.' The pregnant group, however, had a
      higher frequency of lymph node involvement at the time
      of diagnosis. A better survival was actually noted for 71
      patients who were pregnant within a year before or five
      years after a diagnosis of melanoma, but the control group
      consisted of only 31 women who did not get pregnant
      during a similar interval and who actually had higher
      stage disease.47 In another study, women diagnosed with
      melanoma before getting pregnant were compared with
      women diagnosed after completing all pregnancies.39 The
      latter group actually appeared to do worse at five years,
      although statistical comparison was not provided. In a retrospective
      study conducted at Duke University, 43
      women with stage I melanoma who became pregnant
      within the next five years had prognoses similar to those
      of 337 women who did not get pregnant, both in terms of
      relapse and disease-free survival.9
      There is no evidence that nulliparous women as a
      group differ from parous women as a group, in terms of
      prognosis from the time of a subsequent diagnosis of
      melanoma while pregnant. In a study that compared 85
      women diagnosed with melanoma before their first pregnancy
      with 143 women who had completed all pregnancies,
      melanoma developed in 68 between pregnancies and
      in 92 during pregnancy, and there was no difference in
      these groups.39 Two other small studies also found no difference
      in prognosis for nulliparous as opposed to parous
      women,4M42 although the studies were small in scope. The
      only trials that address the issue of the importance of subsequent
      pregnancy on prognosis have failed to identify
      parity as an important variable in multivariate analysis.39
      In the absence of definitive data, many authorities have
      recommended that women avoid pregnancy for two to
      five years after a diagnosis of melanoma, mainly because
      that is the time period during which most recurrences are
      diagnosed.'944149 In one study, such patients who did become
      pregnant were actually used as controls to compare
      with patients who were being diagnosed with melanoma
      for the first time while pregnant.37

      Should women who previously were diagnosed with
      melanoma during a pregnancy avoid subsequent pregnancy?
      Historically, there has been great concern regarding
      the risk of subsequent pregnancy in women who were initially
      diagnosed with melanoma during a previous pregnancy,
      based on the presumption that these melanomas in
      particular may be influenced adversely by growth factors
      and hormones secreted during pregnancy. Earlier observers
      felt strongly that pregnancy worsened the prognosis
      in this group of patients.2549 There is no objective
      evidence that this group is at higher risk with subsequent
      pregnancy, however. Despite this, the consensus is to recommend
      the deferral of subsequent pregnancy for two to
      three years in women in whom a primary melanoma developed
      during pregnancy.7

      Is there a risk of transplacental metastases to the fetus:?

      There definitely is a risk of transplacental transmission
      of melanoma from mother to fetus, but fortunately
      this risk is low.  Placental involvement itself is indicative
      of widespread hematogenous dissemination in the
      mother, but placental involvement does not necessarily
      mean that the newborn baby will have melanoma. Of 35
      cases of placental or fetal involvement with cancer following
      pregnancy, one study found that 11 were due to
      melanoma, the most common cancer associated with this
      phenomenon, followed by leukemia or lymphoma. Of
      the 11 melanoma patients, the placenta was involved in 7
      and the fetus in 6. Two of the infants with melanoma underwent
      spontaneous regression of disease after delivery.
      It has been suggested that only 25% of infants with placental
      metastatic melanoma will actually die of metastatic
      melanoma, and it is almost always manifest at the time
      of delivery and then fails to regress spontaneously after
      delivery. The implications of these observations are that
      women diagnosed with metastatic melanoma during
      pregnancy need not abort their fetus out of a fear of
      transplacental spread, and active therapy for a fetus born
      in the setting of placental metastases is not warranted. 

      Loading spinner
Viewing 15 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.