› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Phase 1 trial thing might want to know
- This topic has 42 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 12 months ago by eturner82.
- Post
-
- May 20, 2015 at 10:12 pm
Just thought someone would like to know what I've learned about phase 1 trials. Basically they are very hard to get into. If I understand right from the several places I've talked to they seem to work the same. Basically they start with usually 3 open slots. If this trial is shared among multiple sites then the slots are shared too. When the last of those slots are filled the clock starts. In about 8 weeks they examine those folks and determine if the trial can continue and what they need to do like raise the dose or whatever. Then 3 more slots open and the process repeats. Sooo very narrow window of getting an open slot. A huge amount of time waiting. Lots of people wanting too few slots. Then we have to deal with some of the results reported might not be that stellar. Like the mga271 med had pretty much no response so they are testing now for the b7-h3 and hoping it will work.
Fortunately I've heard twice this week from NIH in Bethesda so I'm hoping that continues good and it will happen. It sounds like it will. The last numbers I saw had a 50% response rate and 12% cure. Which is incredible but who knows. But I've been on the wrong side of the 85% braf stuff sooo I'm hoping and praying if it happens this will work for me. Fortunately I'm still feeling ok and walking ok. I'm looking forward to it despite what some folks think about it. Dunno yet if it will happen but I'm hopeful. They did say the last step will be il-2 so I would rather do it this way than by itself.
Anyway enough rambling. Just thought I would share about the phase 1 stuff.
Artie
- Replies
-
-
- May 21, 2015 at 1:50 am
Thanks Artie. I was not aware of the Phase I process, so thanks for the info. A related point that I read on a patient blog recently–you must be a patient of an institution in order to be considered for a trial at that institution. (In order to be a patient, you need only have had one appt.) Good luck with the NIH.
-
- May 21, 2015 at 1:50 am
Thanks Artie. I was not aware of the Phase I process, so thanks for the info. A related point that I read on a patient blog recently–you must be a patient of an institution in order to be considered for a trial at that institution. (In order to be a patient, you need only have had one appt.) Good luck with the NIH.
-
- May 21, 2015 at 12:31 pm
Thanks Mat. Yeah I went to university of Chicago for that one appt. I'm really hoping NIH works for me. Saw it on that pbs show.
Artie
-
- May 21, 2015 at 12:31 pm
Thanks Mat. Yeah I went to university of Chicago for that one appt. I'm really hoping NIH works for me. Saw it on that pbs show.
Artie
-
- May 21, 2015 at 12:31 pm
Thanks Mat. Yeah I went to university of Chicago for that one appt. I'm really hoping NIH works for me. Saw it on that pbs show.
Artie
-
- May 21, 2015 at 1:50 am
Thanks Artie. I was not aware of the Phase I process, so thanks for the info. A related point that I read on a patient blog recently–you must be a patient of an institution in order to be considered for a trial at that institution. (In order to be a patient, you need only have had one appt.) Good luck with the NIH.
-
- May 21, 2015 at 6:13 am
Hi Artie,
I'm in one of the Bristol Myers Squibb phase I trials, Nivolumab + Lirilumab. I should get my 32nd biweekly dose next week. I know UChicago, where you went up to, is one of BMS's 5 special phase I trial sites.
To add to your experiences, I was able to get into my phase I trial during the second "dose expansion" cohort that had 16 slots for melanoma (and additional 16 slots per 5 additional cancer types). All 96 of those slots opened at the same time. Whereas the prior, first "dose escalation" cohort was much smaller and I believe followed the same slow narrow on-boarding schedule you describe.
The bigger dose expansion cohorts didn't open up until the "maximum tolerable dose" / MTD was determined by earlier dose escalation cohorts. For a different phase I trial that I didn't get into, I spent a month waiting for it to get through the dose escalation phase. But that kept getting delayed each time someone had an adverse effect that needed to be examined. So I finally jumped at the first PD-1 trial that had an opening for me, which was this one in when I hit the "dose expansion" cohort timing just right.
Wishing you continued movement towards NIH and success, and with any other trial you're still looking into.
– Kyle
-
- May 21, 2015 at 12:33 pm
Thanks Kyle. That makes more sense that at some point they expand to a much larger number of open slots. Yeah I'm looking forward to NIH.
Artie
-
- May 21, 2015 at 12:33 pm
Thanks Kyle. That makes more sense that at some point they expand to a much larger number of open slots. Yeah I'm looking forward to NIH.
Artie
-
- May 21, 2015 at 12:33 pm
Thanks Kyle. That makes more sense that at some point they expand to a much larger number of open slots. Yeah I'm looking forward to NIH.
Artie
-
- May 22, 2015 at 5:10 am
Brian, all I know are the ongoing results for me, which continues to be stable disease on the CT, and tolerating the treatment well. Every couple of months when I see the trial doctor, I usually ask, but he hasn't had anything to pass on. I imagine there won't be any phase I results before 2016 or later. I'll see my doctor again the week after ASCO. I'll be interested what if anything he'll have to say about everything going on there.
-
- May 22, 2015 at 5:10 am
Brian, all I know are the ongoing results for me, which continues to be stable disease on the CT, and tolerating the treatment well. Every couple of months when I see the trial doctor, I usually ask, but he hasn't had anything to pass on. I imagine there won't be any phase I results before 2016 or later. I'll see my doctor again the week after ASCO. I'll be interested what if anything he'll have to say about everything going on there.
-
- May 22, 2015 at 5:10 am
Brian, all I know are the ongoing results for me, which continues to be stable disease on the CT, and tolerating the treatment well. Every couple of months when I see the trial doctor, I usually ask, but he hasn't had anything to pass on. I imagine there won't be any phase I results before 2016 or later. I'll see my doctor again the week after ASCO. I'll be interested what if anything he'll have to say about everything going on there.
-
- May 21, 2015 at 6:13 am
Hi Artie,
I'm in one of the Bristol Myers Squibb phase I trials, Nivolumab + Lirilumab. I should get my 32nd biweekly dose next week. I know UChicago, where you went up to, is one of BMS's 5 special phase I trial sites.
To add to your experiences, I was able to get into my phase I trial during the second "dose expansion" cohort that had 16 slots for melanoma (and additional 16 slots per 5 additional cancer types). All 96 of those slots opened at the same time. Whereas the prior, first "dose escalation" cohort was much smaller and I believe followed the same slow narrow on-boarding schedule you describe.
The bigger dose expansion cohorts didn't open up until the "maximum tolerable dose" / MTD was determined by earlier dose escalation cohorts. For a different phase I trial that I didn't get into, I spent a month waiting for it to get through the dose escalation phase. But that kept getting delayed each time someone had an adverse effect that needed to be examined. So I finally jumped at the first PD-1 trial that had an opening for me, which was this one in when I hit the "dose expansion" cohort timing just right.
Wishing you continued movement towards NIH and success, and with any other trial you're still looking into.
– Kyle
-
- May 21, 2015 at 6:13 am
Hi Artie,
I'm in one of the Bristol Myers Squibb phase I trials, Nivolumab + Lirilumab. I should get my 32nd biweekly dose next week. I know UChicago, where you went up to, is one of BMS's 5 special phase I trial sites.
To add to your experiences, I was able to get into my phase I trial during the second "dose expansion" cohort that had 16 slots for melanoma (and additional 16 slots per 5 additional cancer types). All 96 of those slots opened at the same time. Whereas the prior, first "dose escalation" cohort was much smaller and I believe followed the same slow narrow on-boarding schedule you describe.
The bigger dose expansion cohorts didn't open up until the "maximum tolerable dose" / MTD was determined by earlier dose escalation cohorts. For a different phase I trial that I didn't get into, I spent a month waiting for it to get through the dose escalation phase. But that kept getting delayed each time someone had an adverse effect that needed to be examined. So I finally jumped at the first PD-1 trial that had an opening for me, which was this one in when I hit the "dose expansion" cohort timing just right.
Wishing you continued movement towards NIH and success, and with any other trial you're still looking into.
– Kyle
-
- May 21, 2015 at 4:37 pm
You are right, Artie. Another thing to remember about Phase 1 trials…is that "technically" they are only done to determine dose. Meaning: How much of the treatment does it take to get an effect? And, how much of the treatment causes side effects in the patient? Kyle is right about trial expansion. In my Phase 1 Nivo (Opdivo) with peptide vaccine trial…we started with two arms…NED and non resected. 10 patients were admitted at each of the three dose levels, therefore 30 patients to each arm. However, since then…expansion has been incredible….to include patients who were not given the vaccine (since it didn't help!!) and therefore cut down on admission limiting requirements of a particular HLA typing, to include patients who had had dose limiting side effects from prior ipi, to include Stage III NED patients as well as Stage IV….and on and on…all under the same "trial". On the good side…in Phase 1 trials, for better or worse, every patient gets the medicine. There is no placebo or administration of a recognized to be "less effective" med. It is all pretty crazy. Glad things are looking positive on your plans, Artie. Good luck to you all. Celeste
-
- May 21, 2015 at 4:37 pm
You are right, Artie. Another thing to remember about Phase 1 trials…is that "technically" they are only done to determine dose. Meaning: How much of the treatment does it take to get an effect? And, how much of the treatment causes side effects in the patient? Kyle is right about trial expansion. In my Phase 1 Nivo (Opdivo) with peptide vaccine trial…we started with two arms…NED and non resected. 10 patients were admitted at each of the three dose levels, therefore 30 patients to each arm. However, since then…expansion has been incredible….to include patients who were not given the vaccine (since it didn't help!!) and therefore cut down on admission limiting requirements of a particular HLA typing, to include patients who had had dose limiting side effects from prior ipi, to include Stage III NED patients as well as Stage IV….and on and on…all under the same "trial". On the good side…in Phase 1 trials, for better or worse, every patient gets the medicine. There is no placebo or administration of a recognized to be "less effective" med. It is all pretty crazy. Glad things are looking positive on your plans, Artie. Good luck to you all. Celeste
-
- May 21, 2015 at 4:37 pm
You are right, Artie. Another thing to remember about Phase 1 trials…is that "technically" they are only done to determine dose. Meaning: How much of the treatment does it take to get an effect? And, how much of the treatment causes side effects in the patient? Kyle is right about trial expansion. In my Phase 1 Nivo (Opdivo) with peptide vaccine trial…we started with two arms…NED and non resected. 10 patients were admitted at each of the three dose levels, therefore 30 patients to each arm. However, since then…expansion has been incredible….to include patients who were not given the vaccine (since it didn't help!!) and therefore cut down on admission limiting requirements of a particular HLA typing, to include patients who had had dose limiting side effects from prior ipi, to include Stage III NED patients as well as Stage IV….and on and on…all under the same "trial". On the good side…in Phase 1 trials, for better or worse, every patient gets the medicine. There is no placebo or administration of a recognized to be "less effective" med. It is all pretty crazy. Glad things are looking positive on your plans, Artie. Good luck to you all. Celeste
-
- May 22, 2015 at 2:15 am
Thanks for starting this thread Artie. Good info posted by all. Good luck with NIH. I hope it works out for you.
Brian
-
- May 22, 2015 at 11:30 am
Thanks Brian. Maybe if NIH happens but I need more a good phase 1 trial will have a slot for me by then. At least that's my plan. We shall see.
Artie
-
- May 22, 2015 at 11:30 am
Thanks Brian. Maybe if NIH happens but I need more a good phase 1 trial will have a slot for me by then. At least that's my plan. We shall see.
Artie
-
- May 22, 2015 at 11:30 am
Thanks Brian. Maybe if NIH happens but I need more a good phase 1 trial will have a slot for me by then. At least that's my plan. We shall see.
Artie
-
- May 22, 2015 at 12:32 pm
Hi Artie,
My husband just got the news this week that he has failed PD-1 (also failed IPI. IL2, Braf combo) in thepast 1 1/2 years…. He has many bone mets and lung mets as well. We have also heard from NIH this week. Looks like we are on the same page. I hope things work in your favor.
Emily
-
- May 22, 2015 at 12:32 pm
Hi Artie,
My husband just got the news this week that he has failed PD-1 (also failed IPI. IL2, Braf combo) in thepast 1 1/2 years…. He has many bone mets and lung mets as well. We have also heard from NIH this week. Looks like we are on the same page. I hope things work in your favor.
Emily
-
- May 22, 2015 at 12:32 pm
Hi Artie,
My husband just got the news this week that he has failed PD-1 (also failed IPI. IL2, Braf combo) in thepast 1 1/2 years…. He has many bone mets and lung mets as well. We have also heard from NIH this week. Looks like we are on the same page. I hope things work in your favor.
Emily
-
- May 22, 2015 at 2:27 pm
Emily, I'm sorry to hear your news. If not too intrusive, can you say at what point your husband's onc determined that he failed PD-1? How many weeks into treatment and/or infusions? Did he see a benefit initially and then stop responding? We have a "friend" on MIF who has asked similar questions and your experience may benefit her.
-
- May 22, 2015 at 2:27 pm
Emily, I'm sorry to hear your news. If not too intrusive, can you say at what point your husband's onc determined that he failed PD-1? How many weeks into treatment and/or infusions? Did he see a benefit initially and then stop responding? We have a "friend" on MIF who has asked similar questions and your experience may benefit her.
-
- May 22, 2015 at 2:27 pm
Emily, I'm sorry to hear your news. If not too intrusive, can you say at what point your husband's onc determined that he failed PD-1? How many weeks into treatment and/or infusions? Did he see a benefit initially and then stop responding? We have a "friend" on MIF who has asked similar questions and your experience may benefit her.
-
- May 23, 2015 at 2:05 am
Wow Emily yes it sounds like your husband and I have had similar situation. Good luck to you folks. Maybe we'll see each other some day. lol.
Artie
-
- May 23, 2015 at 2:05 am
Wow Emily yes it sounds like your husband and I have had similar situation. Good luck to you folks. Maybe we'll see each other some day. lol.
Artie
-
- May 23, 2015 at 2:05 am
Wow Emily yes it sounds like your husband and I have had similar situation. Good luck to you folks. Maybe we'll see each other some day. lol.
Artie
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.