The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Newly diagnosed “very early” melanoma

Forums General Melanoma Community Newly diagnosed “very early” melanoma

  • Post
    cc
    Participant

      Good morning, 

         My dermatologist called on Friday morning stating that a  mole that I had removed last week from my lower leg was found to be positive for a "very early" melanoma.  Of course, I wasn't prepared for that and don't think I asked the right questions.  I did ask him how he knew that it was very early, and he said that that was what the pathology report stated.  He then told me to come cack in on Thursday of this week to his office to have it removed.  i have been calling the office to try to get the data from the report, but have not  heard back.  From reading around on this site, I think that he must mean that it is in situ.  My question is, do I try to schedule an appointment with a melonoma specialist, even if it is a "very early" melanoma?  I am not far from the University of Pennsylvania, and would go there, but I am not sure if  I need a specialist for an early melanoma.

       

      Thanks!

        CC

    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Replies
        Janner
        Participant

          You could if that makes you feel good, but I probably wouldn't.  I suspect you are right that it is most likely in situ and I think your derm could handle the WLE.  (Some derms don't do surgery like this but mine did and it was fine for me).  Just confirm with the doc before the stage or depth before your surgery.  You would have to wait longer to get things done at UPenn.  Get a copy of your path report for your own records.  

            cc
            Participant

              Thanks so much!  I did finally get my pathology report and it says that it is melanoma in situ.  It also says that there is secondary lichen simplex chronicus, probably from rubbing, in my specimen.  I had  never heard of this, and when I researched it this afternoon, I found that it almost always associated with and caused by chronic severe itching.  This is disturbing to me because my lesion was never itchy, so I never scratched it, and so I feel that I cannot possibly have that condition.  Is anyone familiar with this?   

              cc
              Participant

                Thanks so much!  I did finally get my pathology report and it says that it is melanoma in situ.  It also says that there is secondary lichen simplex chronicus, probably from rubbing, in my specimen.  I had  never heard of this, and when I researched it this afternoon, I found that it almost always associated with and caused by chronic severe itching.  This is disturbing to me because my lesion was never itchy, so I never scratched it, and so I feel that I cannot possibly have that condition.  Is anyone familiar with this?   

                cc
                Participant

                  Thanks so much!  I did finally get my pathology report and it says that it is melanoma in situ.  It also says that there is secondary lichen simplex chronicus, probably from rubbing, in my specimen.  I had  never heard of this, and when I researched it this afternoon, I found that it almost always associated with and caused by chronic severe itching.  This is disturbing to me because my lesion was never itchy, so I never scratched it, and so I feel that I cannot possibly have that condition.  Is anyone familiar with this?   

                Janner
                Participant

                  You could if that makes you feel good, but I probably wouldn't.  I suspect you are right that it is most likely in situ and I think your derm could handle the WLE.  (Some derms don't do surgery like this but mine did and it was fine for me).  Just confirm with the doc before the stage or depth before your surgery.  You would have to wait longer to get things done at UPenn.  Get a copy of your path report for your own records.  

                  Janner
                  Participant

                    You could if that makes you feel good, but I probably wouldn't.  I suspect you are right that it is most likely in situ and I think your derm could handle the WLE.  (Some derms don't do surgery like this but mine did and it was fine for me).  Just confirm with the doc before the stage or depth before your surgery.  You would have to wait longer to get things done at UPenn.  Get a copy of your path report for your own records.  

                Viewing 2 reply threads
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                About the MRF Patient Forum

                The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                Popular Topics