› Forums › General Melanoma Community › New Help Reading A Path Report Please
- This topic has 24 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by mandican.
- Post
-
- April 30, 2012 at 10:38 pm
Here's what I got back today….
Here's what I got back today….
Compound nevus w/ architectural disorder and focally severe cytological atypia. The lesion extents to the lateral and deep margins. This lesion has severe atypia and it does not appear that it has been completely removed, conservative excision to ensure complete histologic evaluation to exclude an adjacent melanoma is recommenced. Histologic sections are of skin w/ a nevomelanocytic lesion. The lesion has junctional and intradermal elements. Junction cells are present singly as well as in nests. There is a lentiginous proliferation of melancytes along the dermoepidermal junction. These cells have focally severe cytolgoic atypia. In the dermis are nevomelanocytes w/ maturation. Also, in the dermis there is a mild inflammatory cell infiltrate composed predominantly of lymphocytes and there is fibroplasia.
What does this mean?
Thanks!
- Replies
-
-
- April 30, 2012 at 11:39 pm
I hope that Janner comes online to give you a better description. Meanwhile so you aren't worrying right now it means that this is a severly atypical mole. They will take a wider excision to make sure that the edges are clear also. I've had many that were clear with no melanoma.
Good job of getting it removed before this became serious.
Linda
-
- April 30, 2012 at 11:39 pm
I hope that Janner comes online to give you a better description. Meanwhile so you aren't worrying right now it means that this is a severly atypical mole. They will take a wider excision to make sure that the edges are clear also. I've had many that were clear with no melanoma.
Good job of getting it removed before this became serious.
Linda
-
- April 30, 2012 at 11:39 pm
I hope that Janner comes online to give you a better description. Meanwhile so you aren't worrying right now it means that this is a severly atypical mole. They will take a wider excision to make sure that the edges are clear also. I've had many that were clear with no melanoma.
Good job of getting it removed before this became serious.
Linda
-
- May 1, 2012 at 12:10 am
As Linda said, this is a severely atypical lesion and should be removed with 5mm margins. The lesion wasn't totally removed in the biopsy and the pathologist wants to make sure the new tissue removed is analyzed to make sure there isn't any melanoma in that lesion. (Standard procedure to remove more tissue and analyze it, but since your lesion wasn't totally removed the first time, there is the unlikely possibility that something more sinister remains). Most of the "jargon" is justifying the diagnosis and analyzing each line isn't too productive. Bottom line is removing more tissue. Watch your other moles for CHANGE. This isn't melanoma, but it had the possibility to become melanoma in the future. Regular checks with your dermatologist would be a good thing.
Best wishes,
Janner
-
- May 1, 2012 at 3:08 am
Thanks Janner! Is 5mm the same as a WLE? I was stage I in 2004 and had that done. Kinda freaked out when I read the path report. Seemed worse to me than it really is. Knew I could count on you guys to calm me down. I meet with the doc tomorrow for a consult and schedule the procedure. -
- May 1, 2012 at 3:08 am
Thanks Janner! Is 5mm the same as a WLE? I was stage I in 2004 and had that done. Kinda freaked out when I read the path report. Seemed worse to me than it really is. Knew I could count on you guys to calm me down. I meet with the doc tomorrow for a consult and schedule the procedure. -
- May 1, 2012 at 3:08 am
Thanks Janner! Is 5mm the same as a WLE? I was stage I in 2004 and had that done. Kinda freaked out when I read the path report. Seemed worse to me than it really is. Knew I could count on you guys to calm me down. I meet with the doc tomorrow for a consult and schedule the procedure. -
- May 1, 2012 at 10:57 pm
No. No second separate lesion. They just didn't remove the entire lesion the first time and the possibility exists (unlikely) that the remaining portion of the lesion not removed could be melanoma. The remaining pigmented area needs to be evaluated to rule out melanoma.
Janner
-
- May 1, 2012 at 10:57 pm
No. No second separate lesion. They just didn't remove the entire lesion the first time and the possibility exists (unlikely) that the remaining portion of the lesion not removed could be melanoma. The remaining pigmented area needs to be evaluated to rule out melanoma.
Janner
-
- May 1, 2012 at 10:57 pm
No. No second separate lesion. They just didn't remove the entire lesion the first time and the possibility exists (unlikely) that the remaining portion of the lesion not removed could be melanoma. The remaining pigmented area needs to be evaluated to rule out melanoma.
Janner
-
- May 1, 2012 at 12:10 am
As Linda said, this is a severely atypical lesion and should be removed with 5mm margins. The lesion wasn't totally removed in the biopsy and the pathologist wants to make sure the new tissue removed is analyzed to make sure there isn't any melanoma in that lesion. (Standard procedure to remove more tissue and analyze it, but since your lesion wasn't totally removed the first time, there is the unlikely possibility that something more sinister remains). Most of the "jargon" is justifying the diagnosis and analyzing each line isn't too productive. Bottom line is removing more tissue. Watch your other moles for CHANGE. This isn't melanoma, but it had the possibility to become melanoma in the future. Regular checks with your dermatologist would be a good thing.
Best wishes,
Janner
-
- May 1, 2012 at 12:10 am
As Linda said, this is a severely atypical lesion and should be removed with 5mm margins. The lesion wasn't totally removed in the biopsy and the pathologist wants to make sure the new tissue removed is analyzed to make sure there isn't any melanoma in that lesion. (Standard procedure to remove more tissue and analyze it, but since your lesion wasn't totally removed the first time, there is the unlikely possibility that something more sinister remains). Most of the "jargon" is justifying the diagnosis and analyzing each line isn't too productive. Bottom line is removing more tissue. Watch your other moles for CHANGE. This isn't melanoma, but it had the possibility to become melanoma in the future. Regular checks with your dermatologist would be a good thing.
Best wishes,
Janner
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.