› Forums › General Melanoma Community › How to get doc to listen
- This topic has 15 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 2 months ago by sal d.
- Post
-
- February 9, 2013 at 12:49 am
Skin appt this week. I have had 4 in situs in past 11 years. 58 punch biopsies. Photos twice. I have three things I want biopsied, but I know it will be a hassle. Residents dont listen. i am a nurse so…………one spot is like two tiny black spots together on my thigh. I know it is new….within a year. So I want it off. I have not been for exam in two years because I know they think Insitus are just nothing. Frustrated. Had to switch docs due to my insurance. Any suggestions on how to get these stupid three spots taken off?Skin appt this week. I have had 4 in situs in past 11 years. 58 punch biopsies. Photos twice. I have three things I want biopsied, but I know it will be a hassle. Residents dont listen. i am a nurse so…………one spot is like two tiny black spots together on my thigh. I know it is new….within a year. So I want it off. I have not been for exam in two years because I know they think Insitus are just nothing. Frustrated. Had to switch docs due to my insurance. Any suggestions on how to get these stupid three spots taken off?
- Replies
-
-
- February 9, 2013 at 2:05 am
Say the 3 lesions have changed. If they don't go along, ask that they guarantee IN WRITING these are not melanoma. That usually prods most docs along – fear of being sued is a powerful thing. I hate that type of tactic, but they work for you not the other way around. You could also ask your PCP. My one PCP would tell me he would biopsy anything of concern I had whether or not my derm thought it an issue or not. Fortunately, my derm has always listened to me, but it was nice knowing I had a backup plan.
Best wishes,
Janner-
- February 12, 2013 at 3:22 am
My email is available through this site. Click on my name to go to my profile, then click on Contact. You can send an email that way. But when it comes to pictures, they don't tell me much. You can't know just from looking if something is "bad". I look for "ugly duckling" – different from all my other moles – and change for the worse over time. I'll quote the derm that runs a mole mapping clinical trial at my institution. "New and consistent with other moles is fine. New and different from everything else is suspect". For me, all my primaries changed for the worse over time so that is my criteria. Single pictures probably would not have required 2/3 of my primaries be removed unless you compared them with all my other moles. They stood out as being the ugly duckling moreso than answering the ABCDs of melanoma.
Best wishes,
Janner
-
- February 12, 2013 at 3:22 am
My email is available through this site. Click on my name to go to my profile, then click on Contact. You can send an email that way. But when it comes to pictures, they don't tell me much. You can't know just from looking if something is "bad". I look for "ugly duckling" – different from all my other moles – and change for the worse over time. I'll quote the derm that runs a mole mapping clinical trial at my institution. "New and consistent with other moles is fine. New and different from everything else is suspect". For me, all my primaries changed for the worse over time so that is my criteria. Single pictures probably would not have required 2/3 of my primaries be removed unless you compared them with all my other moles. They stood out as being the ugly duckling moreso than answering the ABCDs of melanoma.
Best wishes,
Janner
-
- February 12, 2013 at 3:22 am
My email is available through this site. Click on my name to go to my profile, then click on Contact. You can send an email that way. But when it comes to pictures, they don't tell me much. You can't know just from looking if something is "bad". I look for "ugly duckling" – different from all my other moles – and change for the worse over time. I'll quote the derm that runs a mole mapping clinical trial at my institution. "New and consistent with other moles is fine. New and different from everything else is suspect". For me, all my primaries changed for the worse over time so that is my criteria. Single pictures probably would not have required 2/3 of my primaries be removed unless you compared them with all my other moles. They stood out as being the ugly duckling moreso than answering the ABCDs of melanoma.
Best wishes,
Janner
-
- February 9, 2013 at 2:05 am
Say the 3 lesions have changed. If they don't go along, ask that they guarantee IN WRITING these are not melanoma. That usually prods most docs along – fear of being sued is a powerful thing. I hate that type of tactic, but they work for you not the other way around. You could also ask your PCP. My one PCP would tell me he would biopsy anything of concern I had whether or not my derm thought it an issue or not. Fortunately, my derm has always listened to me, but it was nice knowing I had a backup plan.
Best wishes,
Janner -
- February 9, 2013 at 2:05 am
Say the 3 lesions have changed. If they don't go along, ask that they guarantee IN WRITING these are not melanoma. That usually prods most docs along – fear of being sued is a powerful thing. I hate that type of tactic, but they work for you not the other way around. You could also ask your PCP. My one PCP would tell me he would biopsy anything of concern I had whether or not my derm thought it an issue or not. Fortunately, my derm has always listened to me, but it was nice knowing I had a backup plan.
Best wishes,
Janner
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.