› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Negative “side effects” of the BRAF/MEK combo
- This topic has 18 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 11 months ago by Wader.
- Post
-
- January 13, 2015 at 2:18 pm
(I'm not basing the combo with my last two topics, these just are new releases that are hopefully helping others)
New research on the combo:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-01/hlmc-mrd011215.php
Moffitt Cancer Center researchers have discovered a mechanism that leads to resistance to targeted therapy in melanoma patients and are investigating strategies to counteract it. Targeted biological therapy can reduce toxicity and improve outcomes for many cancer patients, when compared to the adverse effects of standard chemotherapeutic drugs. However, patients often develop resistance to these targeted therapies, resulting in more aggressive cells that can spread to other sites or cause regrowth of primary tumors.
Moffitt researchers found that patients who are on B-Raf inhibitor drugs develop more new metastases than patients who are on standard chemotherapy.
They found that melanoma cells that are resistant to B-Raf inhibitors tend to be more aggressive and invasive, thereby allowing the tumor to spread to a new organ site.
My wife has had a good benefit from the combo when she urgently needed them to work. However, she came out of the treatment (when resistance occured) with new and aggressively spreading mets – so although N=1, this does sound familiar and makes me regret in hindsight that we didn't move to immonutherapie before resistance occured.
- Replies
-
-
- January 13, 2015 at 4:13 pm
Rick, thanks for posting. This is useful info for those of us on the combo and I've already followed-up with my onc about it. This seems to validate movement towards intermittent dosing, which I know some folks (Rudy/Gina) already do.
-
- January 15, 2015 at 1:56 am
Hey Roxanne,
This is an older study when they were just working on this issue in the lab. Now they have seen good results in us real live HUMAN ratties! But, this post may help answer your question.
Hope it helps. Yours, Celeste
-
- January 15, 2015 at 1:56 am
Hey Roxanne,
This is an older study when they were just working on this issue in the lab. Now they have seen good results in us real live HUMAN ratties! But, this post may help answer your question.
Hope it helps. Yours, Celeste
-
- January 15, 2015 at 1:56 am
Hey Roxanne,
This is an older study when they were just working on this issue in the lab. Now they have seen good results in us real live HUMAN ratties! But, this post may help answer your question.
Hope it helps. Yours, Celeste
-
- January 14, 2015 at 2:14 pm
As follow-up, MIF is reporting that their scientific board thinks that the article may be misleading in that it suggests (for patients otherwise getting good results) moving into intermittent dosing. The significance of the underlying study on which the article is based is that researchers may be on the path to finding the cause of resistance.
-
- January 14, 2015 at 2:14 pm
As follow-up, MIF is reporting that their scientific board thinks that the article may be misleading in that it suggests (for patients otherwise getting good results) moving into intermittent dosing. The significance of the underlying study on which the article is based is that researchers may be on the path to finding the cause of resistance.
-
- January 14, 2015 at 2:14 pm
As follow-up, MIF is reporting that their scientific board thinks that the article may be misleading in that it suggests (for patients otherwise getting good results) moving into intermittent dosing. The significance of the underlying study on which the article is based is that researchers may be on the path to finding the cause of resistance.
-
- January 15, 2015 at 11:51 am
This article talks about this combo and gives advice:
-
- January 15, 2015 at 11:51 am
This article talks about this combo and gives advice:
-
- January 15, 2015 at 11:51 am
This article talks about this combo and gives advice:
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.