Good news I think
REGISTER
The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Good news I think

› Forums › Cutaneous Melanoma Community › Good news I think

  • Post
    • February 14, 2016 at 1:17 am
    _Paul_
    Participant

    After two failed attempts I was finally able to complete a PET (ipi made me a type 1 diabetic and it’s hard to meet the SCCA's PET requirement of glucose < 150 with no meds or insulin the day of).

    I am not due to meet with my excellent oncologist, Dr. John Thompson, until Wednesday. But I emailed him yesterday if he would share the radiology report with me in advance (he knows me well enough that I won't freak out) which he did. So when I got the results in an email at work, I took a deep breath, read it, and was pleasantly surprised by what appears to be good news.

    In the "Impression" section at the end it states "No PET evidence to suggest macroscopic metastatic melanoma". Even though the PET/CT did image a bunch of nodules that were previously identified as "highly concerning" for MM, this time none of them demonstrated abnormal FDG uptake.

    I am no doctor, but I wonder if this result, coupled with the fact that I have no known cutaneous (or sub-q) tumors, might actually mean I am NED? Or would I have to have all the non-FDG nodules disappear to qualify for that elusive outcome?

    I guess its obvious by the fact that I posted this that I am eager to hear what he has to say, and I know I should just wait, but you guys are such a source of excellent information. Even though I have only met a couple of you, you all feel like my peeps!

    – Paul

Viewing 17 reply threads
  • Replies
      • February 14, 2016 at 1:53 am
      AshleyS
      Participant

      Hi Paul. Congrats on what sounds like great results. I received NED status in November and things still looked good in January. My report does say I have groundglass nodules in my lungs. Early on I did not have those. I've now had a cough for the past seven weeks. The nodules could be pneumonitis in my lungs showing up on my scans. Anyway, even though something is showing up In my lungs, my doctor is confident enough to label me NED. (But I've  always been shooting for stable, so I take that too.)

      Best of luck with your oncologist! 

      Ashley

      • February 14, 2016 at 1:53 am
      AshleyS
      Participant

      Hi Paul. Congrats on what sounds like great results. I received NED status in November and things still looked good in January. My report does say I have groundglass nodules in my lungs. Early on I did not have those. I've now had a cough for the past seven weeks. The nodules could be pneumonitis in my lungs showing up on my scans. Anyway, even though something is showing up In my lungs, my doctor is confident enough to label me NED. (But I've  always been shooting for stable, so I take that too.)

      Best of luck with your oncologist! 

      Ashley

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:44 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        I had those ground glass nodules at one point too and they just magically resolved. I asked about them on this board and Artie (miss him) and Celeste basically said they are inflammations that that indicated pneumonitis like you said. So they did not seem like anything I had to worry about and were called out separately from the other lung nodules.

        I hope you remain at NED, period!

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:44 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        I had those ground glass nodules at one point too and they just magically resolved. I asked about them on this board and Artie (miss him) and Celeste basically said they are inflammations that that indicated pneumonitis like you said. So they did not seem like anything I had to worry about and were called out separately from the other lung nodules.

        I hope you remain at NED, period!

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:44 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        I had those ground glass nodules at one point too and they just magically resolved. I asked about them on this board and Artie (miss him) and Celeste basically said they are inflammations that that indicated pneumonitis like you said. So they did not seem like anything I had to worry about and were called out separately from the other lung nodules.

        I hope you remain at NED, period!

      • February 14, 2016 at 1:53 am
      AshleyS
      Participant

      Hi Paul. Congrats on what sounds like great results. I received NED status in November and things still looked good in January. My report does say I have groundglass nodules in my lungs. Early on I did not have those. I've now had a cough for the past seven weeks. The nodules could be pneumonitis in my lungs showing up on my scans. Anyway, even though something is showing up In my lungs, my doctor is confident enough to label me NED. (But I've  always been shooting for stable, so I take that too.)

      Best of luck with your oncologist! 

      Ashley

      • February 14, 2016 at 3:26 am
      Mat
      Participant

      Paul, sounds like great news!  It may be NEAD, a term I learned on MIF.  No evidence of active disease.  In either case, I'm sure you'll take it. 

      • February 14, 2016 at 3:26 am
      Mat
      Participant

      Paul, sounds like great news!  It may be NEAD, a term I learned on MIF.  No evidence of active disease.  In either case, I'm sure you'll take it. 

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:46 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Hi Mat, now that you mention it, I think I saw you using that in an earlier post. Yes, that's probably more accurate, plus it has a better ring to it ;-).

        And you are correct, I will most certainly take it!

        – Paul

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:46 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Hi Mat, now that you mention it, I think I saw you using that in an earlier post. Yes, that's probably more accurate, plus it has a better ring to it ;-).

        And you are correct, I will most certainly take it!

        – Paul

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:46 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Hi Mat, now that you mention it, I think I saw you using that in an earlier post. Yes, that's probably more accurate, plus it has a better ring to it ;-).

        And you are correct, I will most certainly take it!

        – Paul

      • February 14, 2016 at 3:26 am
      Mat
      Participant

      Paul, sounds like great news!  It may be NEAD, a term I learned on MIF.  No evidence of active disease.  In either case, I'm sure you'll take it. 

      • February 14, 2016 at 1:27 pm
      Bubbles
      Participant

      Oh, Paul! That certainly sounds like good news to me! Good luck with your appointment Wednesday! C

      • February 14, 2016 at 1:27 pm
      Bubbles
      Participant

      Oh, Paul! That certainly sounds like good news to me! Good luck with your appointment Wednesday! C

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:49 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thanks Celeste! It sure is nice to be able to look forward to meeting my onc.

        – Paul

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:49 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thanks Celeste! It sure is nice to be able to look forward to meeting my onc.

        – Paul

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:49 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thanks Celeste! It sure is nice to be able to look forward to meeting my onc.

        – Paul

      • February 14, 2016 at 1:27 pm
      Bubbles
      Participant

      Oh, Paul! That certainly sounds like good news to me! Good luck with your appointment Wednesday! C

      • February 14, 2016 at 1:51 pm
      jenny22
      Participant

      Paul- It certainly sounds like goods news…..and nice you that you have that relationship with your ONC.

      Will be looking for your "offical" update after your appt this week.

      Keeping my fingers crossed for more good news!

      Best,

      jenny

      • February 14, 2016 at 1:51 pm
      jenny22
      Participant

      Paul- It certainly sounds like goods news…..and nice you that you have that relationship with your ONC.

      Will be looking for your "offical" update after your appt this week.

      Keeping my fingers crossed for more good news!

      Best,

      jenny

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:52 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thanks Jenny. I really like my onc. He doesn't BS me and knows me well enough to just lay it all on the line. I know that some oncs will only divulge scan results in person, but my take is that he is pretty compassionate about patient feelings.

        – Paul

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:52 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thanks Jenny. I really like my onc. He doesn't BS me and knows me well enough to just lay it all on the line. I know that some oncs will only divulge scan results in person, but my take is that he is pretty compassionate about patient feelings.

        – Paul

        • February 14, 2016 at 6:52 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thanks Jenny. I really like my onc. He doesn't BS me and knows me well enough to just lay it all on the line. I know that some oncs will only divulge scan results in person, but my take is that he is pretty compassionate about patient feelings.

        – Paul

      • February 14, 2016 at 1:51 pm
      jenny22
      Participant

      Paul- It certainly sounds like goods news…..and nice you that you have that relationship with your ONC.

      Will be looking for your "offical" update after your appt this week.

      Keeping my fingers crossed for more good news!

      Best,

      jenny

      • February 14, 2016 at 8:02 pm
      DZnDef
      Participant

      Congratulations, Paul!  Those do appear to be good results.  Looking forward to reading what your doctor says on Wed.  At a minimum, those results certainly don't indicate that you've gotten worse (and that's always a good thing).

      • February 14, 2016 at 8:02 pm
      DZnDef
      Participant

      Congratulations, Paul!  Those do appear to be good results.  Looking forward to reading what your doctor says on Wed.  At a minimum, those results certainly don't indicate that you've gotten worse (and that's always a good thing).

        • February 17, 2016 at 5:17 am
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thanks Maggie. I don't want to be greedy because I will definately be happy with stable, or NEAD, but of course, I would not say no to NED!

        – Paul

        • February 17, 2016 at 5:17 am
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thanks Maggie. I don't want to be greedy because I will definately be happy with stable, or NEAD, but of course, I would not say no to NED!

        – Paul

        • February 17, 2016 at 5:17 am
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thanks Maggie. I don't want to be greedy because I will definately be happy with stable, or NEAD, but of course, I would not say no to NED!

        – Paul

      • February 14, 2016 at 8:02 pm
      DZnDef
      Participant

      Congratulations, Paul!  Those do appear to be good results.  Looking forward to reading what your doctor says on Wed.  At a minimum, those results certainly don't indicate that you've gotten worse (and that's always a good thing).

      • February 15, 2016 at 4:25 am
      adriana cooper
      Participant

      Good news Paul, Met you last year at symposium. Adriana is thinking about switching to Dr. Thompson due to lack of communication (follow-u on calls ect. miss Dr. Margolin) from current Dr. Just had Keytruda #5 and scans scheduled for 2 weeks. Brain met from October seems to be responding to the Gamma Knife.  Were your scans on Fri? We always get a copy of the scans same day on a disk and then have an appointment the next day for results/radiology report. Waiting sucks. Has this not been the norm for you? Good luck.

      Rob and Adriana

        • February 16, 2016 at 2:49 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Hi Rob,

        I hear you about Dr. Margolin, but I feel fortunate to now have Dr. Thompson. Hopefully Adriana will experience the abscopal effect from the combination of radiation and pembro!

        My scans were actually on Thursday, and I received the radiologist's report the next day. This time around was unusual in that it took three attempts before the SCCA would scan me. So I told Dr. Thompson we could just discuss the results on the phone, but since I had an appointment scheduled a little less than a week following the scan we decided just to wait. Normally I have an appointment the next day to discuss the findings.

        Have you heard anything about a symposium this year? So far I have not heard a peep.

        – Paul

        • February 16, 2016 at 2:49 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Hi Rob,

        I hear you about Dr. Margolin, but I feel fortunate to now have Dr. Thompson. Hopefully Adriana will experience the abscopal effect from the combination of radiation and pembro!

        My scans were actually on Thursday, and I received the radiologist's report the next day. This time around was unusual in that it took three attempts before the SCCA would scan me. So I told Dr. Thompson we could just discuss the results on the phone, but since I had an appointment scheduled a little less than a week following the scan we decided just to wait. Normally I have an appointment the next day to discuss the findings.

        Have you heard anything about a symposium this year? So far I have not heard a peep.

        – Paul

        • February 17, 2016 at 11:18 pm
        adriana cooper
        Participant

        Checked calender Looks Like May 14.

         

        http://www.melanoma.org/get-involved/calendar-of-events/2016-05

        See you then.

        • February 18, 2016 at 4:57 am
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thank you for posting that Adriana! I guess I didn't look forward enough. Something to look forward to!

        – Paul

        • February 18, 2016 at 4:57 am
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thank you for posting that Adriana! I guess I didn't look forward enough. Something to look forward to!

        – Paul

        • February 18, 2016 at 4:57 am
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Thank you for posting that Adriana! I guess I didn't look forward enough. Something to look forward to!

        – Paul

        • February 17, 2016 at 11:18 pm
        adriana cooper
        Participant

        Checked calender Looks Like May 14.

         

        http://www.melanoma.org/get-involved/calendar-of-events/2016-05

        See you then.

        • February 17, 2016 at 11:18 pm
        adriana cooper
        Participant

        Checked calender Looks Like May 14.

         

        http://www.melanoma.org/get-involved/calendar-of-events/2016-05

        See you then.

        • February 16, 2016 at 2:49 pm
        _Paul_
        Participant

        Hi Rob,

        I hear you about Dr. Margolin, but I feel fortunate to now have Dr. Thompson. Hopefully Adriana will experience the abscopal effect from the combination of radiation and pembro!

        My scans were actually on Thursday, and I received the radiologist's report the next day. This time around was unusual in that it took three attempts before the SCCA would scan me. So I told Dr. Thompson we could just discuss the results on the phone, but since I had an appointment scheduled a little less than a week following the scan we decided just to wait. Normally I have an appointment the next day to discuss the findings.

        Have you heard anything about a symposium this year? So far I have not heard a peep.

        – Paul

      • February 15, 2016 at 4:25 am
      adriana cooper
      Participant

      Good news Paul, Met you last year at symposium. Adriana is thinking about switching to Dr. Thompson due to lack of communication (follow-u on calls ect. miss Dr. Margolin) from current Dr. Just had Keytruda #5 and scans scheduled for 2 weeks. Brain met from October seems to be responding to the Gamma Knife.  Were your scans on Fri? We always get a copy of the scans same day on a disk and then have an appointment the next day for results/radiology report. Waiting sucks. Has this not been the norm for you? Good luck.

      Rob and Adriana

      • February 15, 2016 at 4:25 am
      adriana cooper
      Participant

      Good news Paul, Met you last year at symposium. Adriana is thinking about switching to Dr. Thompson due to lack of communication (follow-u on calls ect. miss Dr. Margolin) from current Dr. Just had Keytruda #5 and scans scheduled for 2 weeks. Brain met from October seems to be responding to the Gamma Knife.  Were your scans on Fri? We always get a copy of the scans same day on a disk and then have an appointment the next day for results/radiology report. Waiting sucks. Has this not been the norm for you? Good luck.

      Rob and Adriana

Viewing 17 reply threads

Tagged: 

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.