The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Too late for Interferon??

Forums General Melanoma Community Too late for Interferon??

  • Post
    ladylite77
    Participant

    I am wanting to know (out of curiosity) if there is a time limit on interferon treatment after diagnosis? I was diagnosed 1 year and 3 mos ago…did surgery, etc. I am stage III metastatic(lymph nodes). I decided not to do interferon after lots of research and specialist input. However, I am now questioning that decision . Is it too late to change my mind? There are many factors causing me to ask this question…I think I will post them in another place.

    I am wanting to know (out of curiosity) if there is a time limit on interferon treatment after diagnosis? I was diagnosed 1 year and 3 mos ago…did surgery, etc. I am stage III metastatic(lymph nodes). I decided not to do interferon after lots of research and specialist input. However, I am now questioning that decision . Is it too late to change my mind? There are many factors causing me to ask this question…I think I will post them in another place.

Viewing 20 reply threads
  • Replies
      Janner
      Participant

      The numbers on the efficacy of Interferon are not very high.  Whether you choose to do it or not is your own choice based on those numbers and your own research.  However, all the clinical trials for Interferon were based on starting treatment no later than 53 days out from lymph node removal.  I might be wrong and the number is 63 days, I can't remember for certain.  Anyway, it was something in the 2 month range.  Either way, your window of starting Interferon is well outside the clinical trial data.  There is no way to even speculate whether doing Interferon at this time would have any benefit at all or even a detriment.  No way to know.  No data exists for you to compare your situation to others or even look at study data this far out from diagnosis.  Given that, it might be hard to even convince an oncologist to start that treatment at this late date.

      Janner
      Participant

      The numbers on the efficacy of Interferon are not very high.  Whether you choose to do it or not is your own choice based on those numbers and your own research.  However, all the clinical trials for Interferon were based on starting treatment no later than 53 days out from lymph node removal.  I might be wrong and the number is 63 days, I can't remember for certain.  Anyway, it was something in the 2 month range.  Either way, your window of starting Interferon is well outside the clinical trial data.  There is no way to even speculate whether doing Interferon at this time would have any benefit at all or even a detriment.  No way to know.  No data exists for you to compare your situation to others or even look at study data this far out from diagnosis.  Given that, it might be hard to even convince an oncologist to start that treatment at this late date.

      Janner
      Participant

      The numbers on the efficacy of Interferon are not very high.  Whether you choose to do it or not is your own choice based on those numbers and your own research.  However, all the clinical trials for Interferon were based on starting treatment no later than 53 days out from lymph node removal.  I might be wrong and the number is 63 days, I can't remember for certain.  Anyway, it was something in the 2 month range.  Either way, your window of starting Interferon is well outside the clinical trial data.  There is no way to even speculate whether doing Interferon at this time would have any benefit at all or even a detriment.  No way to know.  No data exists for you to compare your situation to others or even look at study data this far out from diagnosis.  Given that, it might be hard to even convince an oncologist to start that treatment at this late date.

      MichaelFL
      Participant

      I believe the window is 56 days or 8 weeks after surgery. Your doc will most likely not do it at this point anyway. You are too far out.

      MichaelFL
      Participant

      I believe the window is 56 days or 8 weeks after surgery. Your doc will most likely not do it at this point anyway. You are too far out.

        Janner
        Participant

        Thanks for the date correction.  63 days is for insurance coverage.  Not sure where 53 days came from but I remember 56 days correctly now.

        One more issue I thought of after posting – Insurance may not cover the cost of Interferon this far out, either, even if your doctor is willing.  It is another thing to check out if you are determined to consider doing it now.  Certainly there are people who have done Interferon after the 56 day interval, but usually it was soon after.  They folks may have had complications and were waiting for wounds to heal and such before beginning Interferon.  In the almost 11 years I've been on this site, I don't recall one instance of anyone starting Interferon this late after surgery.

        Janner
        Participant

        Thanks for the date correction.  63 days is for insurance coverage.  Not sure where 53 days came from but I remember 56 days correctly now.

        One more issue I thought of after posting – Insurance may not cover the cost of Interferon this far out, either, even if your doctor is willing.  It is another thing to check out if you are determined to consider doing it now.  Certainly there are people who have done Interferon after the 56 day interval, but usually it was soon after.  They folks may have had complications and were waiting for wounds to heal and such before beginning Interferon.  In the almost 11 years I've been on this site, I don't recall one instance of anyone starting Interferon this late after surgery.

        Janner
        Participant

        Thanks for the date correction.  63 days is for insurance coverage.  Not sure where 53 days came from but I remember 56 days correctly now.

        One more issue I thought of after posting – Insurance may not cover the cost of Interferon this far out, either, even if your doctor is willing.  It is another thing to check out if you are determined to consider doing it now.  Certainly there are people who have done Interferon after the 56 day interval, but usually it was soon after.  They folks may have had complications and were waiting for wounds to heal and such before beginning Interferon.  In the almost 11 years I've been on this site, I don't recall one instance of anyone starting Interferon this late after surgery.

      MichaelFL
      Participant

      I believe the window is 56 days or 8 weeks after surgery. Your doc will most likely not do it at this point anyway. You are too far out.

      Gene_S
      Participant

      Here is a posting that I gave to my oncologist when he suggested interferon for my melanoma.This info is from another melanoma forum group. Note the date that it was posted.

       

      Re: Interferon Posted: 7:39:47 am on 8/5/2010 Modified: Never  

      The promising trials (and this is really where melanoma treatment is being discovered) are the BRAF and MEK trials, some just opening up in many locations.  The target the pathway on a molecular level with an oral drug that has low toxicity.  IL2 and interferon are drugs of past that have low response but high toxicity. The other newer treatment is Ipilimubab and it is in expanded use at various locations, but you must fail another therapy first.  Dacarbazine, a very old chemo is often given for melanoma, and it has the same response rate as IL2 and biochemo, but far less toxic and doesn't require a hospital stay.  It is often used as the randomized part of a clinical trial.  To find trials near you (and there is travel assistance available through the pharma, hospitals and us) go to:  http://www.clinicaltrials.gov

      Also a sad story, see: 

      Gene_S
      Participant

      Here is a posting that I gave to my oncologist when he suggested interferon for my melanoma.This info is from another melanoma forum group. Note the date that it was posted.

       

      Re: Interferon Posted: 7:39:47 am on 8/5/2010 Modified: Never  

      The promising trials (and this is really where melanoma treatment is being discovered) are the BRAF and MEK trials, some just opening up in many locations.  The target the pathway on a molecular level with an oral drug that has low toxicity.  IL2 and interferon are drugs of past that have low response but high toxicity. The other newer treatment is Ipilimubab and it is in expanded use at various locations, but you must fail another therapy first.  Dacarbazine, a very old chemo is often given for melanoma, and it has the same response rate as IL2 and biochemo, but far less toxic and doesn't require a hospital stay.  It is often used as the randomized part of a clinical trial.  To find trials near you (and there is travel assistance available through the pharma, hospitals and us) go to:  http://www.clinicaltrials.gov

      Also a sad story, see: 

      Gene_S
      Participant

      Here is a posting that I gave to my oncologist when he suggested interferon for my melanoma.This info is from another melanoma forum group. Note the date that it was posted.

       

      Re: Interferon Posted: 7:39:47 am on 8/5/2010 Modified: Never  

      The promising trials (and this is really where melanoma treatment is being discovered) are the BRAF and MEK trials, some just opening up in many locations.  The target the pathway on a molecular level with an oral drug that has low toxicity.  IL2 and interferon are drugs of past that have low response but high toxicity. The other newer treatment is Ipilimubab and it is in expanded use at various locations, but you must fail another therapy first.  Dacarbazine, a very old chemo is often given for melanoma, and it has the same response rate as IL2 and biochemo, but far less toxic and doesn't require a hospital stay.  It is often used as the randomized part of a clinical trial.  To find trials near you (and there is travel assistance available through the pharma, hospitals and us) go to:  http://www.clinicaltrials.gov

      Also a sad story, see: 

      MeNDave
      Participant

      Hi,

      Just to let you know, there are a few trials out there for Stage III resected patients now.  Go to the clinical trials website.  I know that they have several vaccine trials out there now, where there wasn't anything a few years back (or even last year).  So when a door closes, open a window!

      MeNDave
      Participant

      Hi,

      Just to let you know, there are a few trials out there for Stage III resected patients now.  Go to the clinical trials website.  I know that they have several vaccine trials out there now, where there wasn't anything a few years back (or even last year).  So when a door closes, open a window!

      MeNDave
      Participant

      Hi,

      Just to let you know, there are a few trials out there for Stage III resected patients now.  Go to the clinical trials website.  I know that they have several vaccine trials out there now, where there wasn't anything a few years back (or even last year).  So when a door closes, open a window!

      ladylite77
      Participant

      Thank you, all for your response to my concerns. I appreciate the information so much. This just confirms my gut instinct that there is no turning back from the decision I made.

      I will definitely start looking into the clinical trials. Thank you for the helpful site and the advice.

      I wil just continue observation and testing as usual.

      Thank you!

      Ladylite77

      ladylite77
      Participant

      Thank you, all for your response to my concerns. I appreciate the information so much. This just confirms my gut instinct that there is no turning back from the decision I made.

      I will definitely start looking into the clinical trials. Thank you for the helpful site and the advice.

      I wil just continue observation and testing as usual.

      Thank you!

      Ladylite77

      ladylite77
      Participant

      Thank you, all for your response to my concerns. I appreciate the information so much. This just confirms my gut instinct that there is no turning back from the decision I made.

      I will definitely start looking into the clinical trials. Thank you for the helpful site and the advice.

      I wil just continue observation and testing as usual.

      Thank you!

      Ladylite77

      EmilyandMike
      Participant

      All the trials for adjuvant therapies will usually require that you to start within 90 days after your node dissection.  My husband didnt do interferon after researching it and he didnt qualify for any other trials at the time.  So he is doing observation…so far so good – almost 3 years later.   My advice is that you stay educated on what trials/therapies are available for stage 4 "just in case"…take care!

      EmilyandMike
      Participant

      All the trials for adjuvant therapies will usually require that you to start within 90 days after your node dissection.  My husband didnt do interferon after researching it and he didnt qualify for any other trials at the time.  So he is doing observation…so far so good – almost 3 years later.   My advice is that you stay educated on what trials/therapies are available for stage 4 "just in case"…take care!

      EmilyandMike
      Participant

      All the trials for adjuvant therapies will usually require that you to start within 90 days after your node dissection.  My husband didnt do interferon after researching it and he didnt qualify for any other trials at the time.  So he is doing observation…so far so good – almost 3 years later.   My advice is that you stay educated on what trials/therapies are available for stage 4 "just in case"…take care!

      Mandi0280
      Participant
      My husband was diagnosed with MM in October 2011 and is just now starting interferon as of 2 weeks ago. He was first on ipilumumab but had to come off of it due to side effects so his Dr now suggested interferon .
      Mandi0280
      Participant
      My husband was diagnosed with MM in October 2011 and is just now starting interferon as of 2 weeks ago. He was first on ipilumumab but had to come off of it due to side effects so his Dr now suggested interferon .
      Mandi0280
      Participant
      My husband was diagnosed with MM in October 2011 and is just now starting interferon as of 2 weeks ago. He was first on ipilumumab but had to come off of it due to side effects so his Dr now suggested interferon .
Viewing 20 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Popular Topics