› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Surgical Margins
- This topic has 3 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 11 years, 5 months ago by Janner.
- Post
-
- November 27, 2012 at 3:21 am
I was recently diagnosed with a Lentigo Maligna Melanoma (in-situ). Plastic Surgeon obtained 5mm margins which came back clear. I am finding some conflicting information on wether these margins are sufficient. My Melanoma-in-Situ from 2009 was also clear with 5mm margins. Is there a difference in recommended margins for Lentigo Maligna and regular Melanoma-in-situ? I am worried now that I need to have more taken from the most recent site as well as from the 3-year-old site. Any suggestions/insight?
I was recently diagnosed with a Lentigo Maligna Melanoma (in-situ). Plastic Surgeon obtained 5mm margins which came back clear. I am finding some conflicting information on wether these margins are sufficient. My Melanoma-in-Situ from 2009 was also clear with 5mm margins. Is there a difference in recommended margins for Lentigo Maligna and regular Melanoma-in-situ? I am worried now that I need to have more taken from the most recent site as well as from the 3-year-old site. Any suggestions/insight?
- Replies
-
-
- November 27, 2012 at 5:20 am
Was your previous primary Lentigo Maligna as well? 5mm margins is the current standard for melanoma in situ (regardless of type) so you are really covered. I know one study was published that might suggest more margins, but that hasn't been accepted as the standard of care. Lentigo Maligna has a higher LOCAL recurrence rate than other types of melanoma, so the key is to watch the area for any type of regrowth. As for your lesion that is 3 years out, you're past the usual time of 2 years which is typically when most lesions recur. Since you have the required margins for both your primaries, I probably wouldn't do anything more at this point except be very vigilant in watching the scar areas for regrowth. LM tends to grow laterally before it invades into the skin so watching the scar doesn't really jeopardize things. If I were in your situation, I definitely wouldn't do anything with the first primary at this point. I probably wouldn't redo the WLE on the second primary either – but I would watch this one closely. The LM margins are acceptable but only you can decide if you are comfortable where things stand.
Just for clarification, a lesion is typically characterized as Lentigo Maligna when it is in situ, and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma when it becomes invasive.
Best wishes,
Janner -
- November 27, 2012 at 5:20 am
Was your previous primary Lentigo Maligna as well? 5mm margins is the current standard for melanoma in situ (regardless of type) so you are really covered. I know one study was published that might suggest more margins, but that hasn't been accepted as the standard of care. Lentigo Maligna has a higher LOCAL recurrence rate than other types of melanoma, so the key is to watch the area for any type of regrowth. As for your lesion that is 3 years out, you're past the usual time of 2 years which is typically when most lesions recur. Since you have the required margins for both your primaries, I probably wouldn't do anything more at this point except be very vigilant in watching the scar areas for regrowth. LM tends to grow laterally before it invades into the skin so watching the scar doesn't really jeopardize things. If I were in your situation, I definitely wouldn't do anything with the first primary at this point. I probably wouldn't redo the WLE on the second primary either – but I would watch this one closely. The LM margins are acceptable but only you can decide if you are comfortable where things stand.
Just for clarification, a lesion is typically characterized as Lentigo Maligna when it is in situ, and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma when it becomes invasive.
Best wishes,
Janner -
- November 27, 2012 at 5:20 am
Was your previous primary Lentigo Maligna as well? 5mm margins is the current standard for melanoma in situ (regardless of type) so you are really covered. I know one study was published that might suggest more margins, but that hasn't been accepted as the standard of care. Lentigo Maligna has a higher LOCAL recurrence rate than other types of melanoma, so the key is to watch the area for any type of regrowth. As for your lesion that is 3 years out, you're past the usual time of 2 years which is typically when most lesions recur. Since you have the required margins for both your primaries, I probably wouldn't do anything more at this point except be very vigilant in watching the scar areas for regrowth. LM tends to grow laterally before it invades into the skin so watching the scar doesn't really jeopardize things. If I were in your situation, I definitely wouldn't do anything with the first primary at this point. I probably wouldn't redo the WLE on the second primary either – but I would watch this one closely. The LM margins are acceptable but only you can decide if you are comfortable where things stand.
Just for clarification, a lesion is typically characterized as Lentigo Maligna when it is in situ, and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma when it becomes invasive.
Best wishes,
Janner
-
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.