The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Staging

Forums General Melanoma Community Staging

  • Post
    Travis G.
    Participant
    How can they tell you what Stage you are without the pet/ct scan results? I’m told I’m stage 3 after the SNB. Just wondering. Thanks.
Viewing 8 reply threads
  • Replies
      Gene_S
      Participant

      Hi Travis,

      If you get a copy of your pathology report from the SNB and post the information on here many can help you?

      Judy (loving wife of Gene Stage IV and now NED for over 4 years)

      Gene_S
      Participant

      Hi Travis,

      If you get a copy of your pathology report from the SNB and post the information on here many can help you?

      Judy (loving wife of Gene Stage IV and now NED for over 4 years)

      Gene_S
      Participant

      Hi Travis,

      If you get a copy of your pathology report from the SNB and post the information on here many can help you?

      Judy (loving wife of Gene Stage IV and now NED for over 4 years)

      youngann
      Participant

      This shows the different stages:

      https://www.melanoma.org/understand-melanoma/diagnosing-melanoma/stages-of-diagnosis

      The PET/CT scan will determine whether you remain a stage 3 or have advanced to stage 4.

      youngann
      Participant

      This shows the different stages:

      https://www.melanoma.org/understand-melanoma/diagnosing-melanoma/stages-of-diagnosis

      The PET/CT scan will determine whether you remain a stage 3 or have advanced to stage 4.

      youngann
      Participant

      This shows the different stages:

      https://www.melanoma.org/understand-melanoma/diagnosing-melanoma/stages-of-diagnosis

      The PET/CT scan will determine whether you remain a stage 3 or have advanced to stage 4.

      debwray
      Participant

      The answer to your question is really that stage is determined by the amount of disease which is evident.. so the scan is to confirm the staging evident from your sentinel node biopsy.

      If anything new shows up.. then the staging is revised on the basis of the new evidence.

      The tests are important to determine appropriate treatment for your actual stage. I was initially a t1a..but roughly 2 years later was reclassified stage 3 as had two positive lymph nodes in groin and pelvis one of which was found as a lump.. So there must have been micro mestasasis at the initial diagnosis…but because this was so unlikely and the harm from unnecessary SNB outweighed the likely benefit I was not offered this test.

      This is why the docs use NED status ie no evidence of disease.. It is about as good as it gets in melanoma world..but does not exclude the possibility that something troublesome and microscopic might be lurking somewhere.

      Sorry, not a cheerful reply but I want my doctors to talk straight to me and want to be involved in the decision making. I was told that I am at high risk for progression… And was offered a trial of pembro/ keytruda to see if that prolonged the progression free time etc.

      Melanoma is a strange Beastie and sometimes the tumours mutate to slightly different types which seems to explain why some patients have a brilliant response to one treatment with the majority of tumours but have one or two pesky ones that don't. It probably also partly explains the greater success of combo treatments..if one drug doesn't  zap that mutation then the other drug has the chance to complete the task…

      Hope your stage does not change after your scan.

      Best of luck with your treatment

      Deb

       

       

       

      debwray
      Participant

      The answer to your question is really that stage is determined by the amount of disease which is evident.. so the scan is to confirm the staging evident from your sentinel node biopsy.

      If anything new shows up.. then the staging is revised on the basis of the new evidence.

      The tests are important to determine appropriate treatment for your actual stage. I was initially a t1a..but roughly 2 years later was reclassified stage 3 as had two positive lymph nodes in groin and pelvis one of which was found as a lump.. So there must have been micro mestasasis at the initial diagnosis…but because this was so unlikely and the harm from unnecessary SNB outweighed the likely benefit I was not offered this test.

      This is why the docs use NED status ie no evidence of disease.. It is about as good as it gets in melanoma world..but does not exclude the possibility that something troublesome and microscopic might be lurking somewhere.

      Sorry, not a cheerful reply but I want my doctors to talk straight to me and want to be involved in the decision making. I was told that I am at high risk for progression… And was offered a trial of pembro/ keytruda to see if that prolonged the progression free time etc.

      Melanoma is a strange Beastie and sometimes the tumours mutate to slightly different types which seems to explain why some patients have a brilliant response to one treatment with the majority of tumours but have one or two pesky ones that don't. It probably also partly explains the greater success of combo treatments..if one drug doesn't  zap that mutation then the other drug has the chance to complete the task…

      Hope your stage does not change after your scan.

      Best of luck with your treatment

      Deb

       

       

       

      debwray
      Participant

      The answer to your question is really that stage is determined by the amount of disease which is evident.. so the scan is to confirm the staging evident from your sentinel node biopsy.

      If anything new shows up.. then the staging is revised on the basis of the new evidence.

      The tests are important to determine appropriate treatment for your actual stage. I was initially a t1a..but roughly 2 years later was reclassified stage 3 as had two positive lymph nodes in groin and pelvis one of which was found as a lump.. So there must have been micro mestasasis at the initial diagnosis…but because this was so unlikely and the harm from unnecessary SNB outweighed the likely benefit I was not offered this test.

      This is why the docs use NED status ie no evidence of disease.. It is about as good as it gets in melanoma world..but does not exclude the possibility that something troublesome and microscopic might be lurking somewhere.

      Sorry, not a cheerful reply but I want my doctors to talk straight to me and want to be involved in the decision making. I was told that I am at high risk for progression… And was offered a trial of pembro/ keytruda to see if that prolonged the progression free time etc.

      Melanoma is a strange Beastie and sometimes the tumours mutate to slightly different types which seems to explain why some patients have a brilliant response to one treatment with the majority of tumours but have one or two pesky ones that don't. It probably also partly explains the greater success of combo treatments..if one drug doesn't  zap that mutation then the other drug has the chance to complete the task…

      Hope your stage does not change after your scan.

      Best of luck with your treatment

      Deb

       

       

       

        Aida Ballesteros
        Participant
        Hi Deb, my dad recently got diagnosed with melanoma in situ, what are the chances of it growing or developing before the drs got it out?
        Aida Ballesteros
        Participant
        Hi Deb, my dad recently got diagnosed with melanoma in situ, what are the chances of it growing or developing before the drs got it out?
        Aida Ballesteros
        Participant
        Hi Deb, my dad recently got diagnosed with melanoma in situ, what are the chances of it growing or developing before the drs got it out?
        jennunicorn
        Participant

        0% chance. In situ is only in the epidermis and cannot get to blood or lymph vessels, which is how the cells spread. With in situ, there IS NO SPREAD! So, it is great your dad caught it early and it's all gone now!

        jennunicorn
        Participant

        0% chance. In situ is only in the epidermis and cannot get to blood or lymph vessels, which is how the cells spread. With in situ, there IS NO SPREAD! So, it is great your dad caught it early and it's all gone now!

        jennunicorn
        Participant

        0% chance. In situ is only in the epidermis and cannot get to blood or lymph vessels, which is how the cells spread. With in situ, there IS NO SPREAD! So, it is great your dad caught it early and it's all gone now!

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.