› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Request for Janner
- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 8 months ago by Janner.
- Post
-
- May 14, 2015 at 3:40 pm
Hi Janner
This is MIke from NJ. Whn the chat was active, we used to both participate regularly.
I skipped my scan this year as being 3B out 10 years but plan on getting one in a few months or so.
Reson for post is that my sister Patty had a recent shave biopsy of a mole on her shoulder and it came back as mm IN SITU
I had questions of the effect of the shave on the true assessment and I was wondering if my sister could call you to get your perspective. She has an appointment tomorrow with a surgeon.
My email is [email protected] if you can send me your contact info.
Regards,
Mike Kelly
- Replies
-
-
- May 14, 2015 at 4:52 pm
Mike, you can have your sister email me and we can go from there. But I have absolutely no worries about a shave biopsy and a melanoma in situ diagnosis. I've never seen a biopsy that only shaves to the epidermis level, they all penetrate into the dermis no matter how shallow. It would be a feat to only remove the epidermis layer. So basically, there is no way she doesn't have clean deep margins so no worry about depth related to margins. Any shave biopsy is fine if the deep margins are clear, staging is only an issue if the lesion is transsected and again, not an issue for in situ.
-
- May 14, 2015 at 10:19 pm
I was diagnosed last week with a clark IV and Brelows depth of 7 .00 mm
deep and pheripheral margins not involved
Lymphatic/ perineural/angi invasion not identified
Miotoic rate 5-10
Associated Melanocyctic nevi not identified
TIL not brisk
Ulceration preset
I see my oncologist and surgeon next week and trying to be optomistic, my family MD questions the Breslows depth.
Scared but not ready to buy the shovel
-
- May 14, 2015 at 10:19 pm
I was diagnosed last week with a clark IV and Brelows depth of 7 .00 mm
deep and pheripheral margins not involved
Lymphatic/ perineural/angi invasion not identified
Miotoic rate 5-10
Associated Melanocyctic nevi not identified
TIL not brisk
Ulceration preset
I see my oncologist and surgeon next week and trying to be optomistic, my family MD questions the Breslows depth.
Scared but not ready to buy the shovel
-
- May 14, 2015 at 10:19 pm
I was diagnosed last week with a clark IV and Brelows depth of 7 .00 mm
deep and pheripheral margins not involved
Lymphatic/ perineural/angi invasion not identified
Miotoic rate 5-10
Associated Melanocyctic nevi not identified
TIL not brisk
Ulceration preset
I see my oncologist and surgeon next week and trying to be optomistic, my family MD questions the Breslows depth.
Scared but not ready to buy the shovel
-
- May 14, 2015 at 4:52 pm
Mike, you can have your sister email me and we can go from there. But I have absolutely no worries about a shave biopsy and a melanoma in situ diagnosis. I've never seen a biopsy that only shaves to the epidermis level, they all penetrate into the dermis no matter how shallow. It would be a feat to only remove the epidermis layer. So basically, there is no way she doesn't have clean deep margins so no worry about depth related to margins. Any shave biopsy is fine if the deep margins are clear, staging is only an issue if the lesion is transsected and again, not an issue for in situ.
-
- May 14, 2015 at 4:52 pm
Mike, you can have your sister email me and we can go from there. But I have absolutely no worries about a shave biopsy and a melanoma in situ diagnosis. I've never seen a biopsy that only shaves to the epidermis level, they all penetrate into the dermis no matter how shallow. It would be a feat to only remove the epidermis layer. So basically, there is no way she doesn't have clean deep margins so no worry about depth related to margins. Any shave biopsy is fine if the deep margins are clear, staging is only an issue if the lesion is transsected and again, not an issue for in situ.
-
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.