The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Radiation necessary?

Forums General Melanoma Community Radiation necessary?

  • Post
    SteveT
    Participant

      Hello,

      Just got back home from Chapel Hill after a WLE and neck dissection. Post-op pathology reports showed some activity atop my head at the primary tumor site (pushing me to 3c) and no sign of spreading beyond 3 lymph nodes (out of 21 removed) in my neck. I have a follow up on Tuesday when I will also meet with a radiologist.

      Apart from some stiffness, I feel great. I just got back from a long walk to the grocery store. 

      Hello,

      Just got back home from Chapel Hill after a WLE and neck dissection. Post-op pathology reports showed some activity atop my head at the primary tumor site (pushing me to 3c) and no sign of spreading beyond 3 lymph nodes (out of 21 removed) in my neck. I have a follow up on Tuesday when I will also meet with a radiologist.

      Apart from some stiffness, I feel great. I just got back from a long walk to the grocery store. 

      How necesary is radiation? The docs want it and they haven't failed me. What is the liklihood that all the cancer was removed? Can someone point me at a study showing definitive benefits of radiation in my circumstances? How much fatigue is involved? Side effects? Has anyone opted out of all post-op treatment in favor of watch and wait and diet and exercise? Has anyone regretted getting radiation?

      Thanks for all the support while I was in the hospital.  Steve

    Viewing 20 reply threads
    • Replies
        Becky C.
        Participant

          Hi,Steve. My name is Becky and I am from Jackson, Ms. I have been stage IV since last October. They found six brain mets at that time, one the size of an egg. I had a craniotomy on the large one and had it safely removed. I had WBR on the other little ones, ending withSTR. AS of my last pet scan, my brain is stable.If I were in your position, i would definitely go forward with radiation, its just too close to the brain.  Melanoma has a mind of its own, it is very unpredictable. The equipment they used on me was called Brainlab. Its supposed to be the latest state of the art. you may want to ask that question. Good luck with whatever you decide. if you have any other questions let me know.

            SteveT
            Participant

              Hi Becky,

              Good info. Not sure if they want to zap my head, neck, or both. How long was your radiation regimen? Did it leave you fatigued?

              Thanks, Steve

              Becky C.
              Participant

                Hi, Stev. I tolerated radiation really well  I did have some fatigue but I did not feel it for a few weeks. Worst thing of course was hair loss.

                Becky C.
                Participant

                  Hi, Stev. I tolerated radiation really well  I did have some fatigue but I did not feel it for a few weeks. Worst thing of course was hair loss.

                  Becky C.
                  Participant

                    Hi, Stev. I tolerated radiation really well  I did have some fatigue but I did not feel it for a few weeks. Worst thing of course was hair loss.

                    SteveT
                    Participant

                      Hi Becky,

                      Good info. Not sure if they want to zap my head, neck, or both. How long was your radiation regimen? Did it leave you fatigued?

                      Thanks, Steve

                      SteveT
                      Participant

                        Hi Becky,

                        Good info. Not sure if they want to zap my head, neck, or both. How long was your radiation regimen? Did it leave you fatigued?

                        Thanks, Steve

                        buffcody
                        Participant

                          I don't think the kind of radiation Steve's doctors would be suggesting at this time would be radiation of the brain. Also, not claiming any expert knowledge of this myself, I would not think someone having melanoma on the head would be anymore likely to have mets to the brain than anyone else with metastatic melanoma.  And I don't get the impression that Steve's melanoma is State IV.  But I don't have an answer to Steve's original question.

                          buffcody
                          Participant

                            I don't think the kind of radiation Steve's doctors would be suggesting at this time would be radiation of the brain. Also, not claiming any expert knowledge of this myself, I would not think someone having melanoma on the head would be anymore likely to have mets to the brain than anyone else with metastatic melanoma.  And I don't get the impression that Steve's melanoma is State IV.  But I don't have an answer to Steve's original question.

                            buffcody
                            Participant

                              Sorry.  I should have said no sign of distant metastasis because he says he is Stage III c.

                              buffcody
                              Participant

                                Sorry.  I should have said no sign of distant metastasis because he says he is Stage III c.

                                buffcody
                                Participant

                                  Sorry.  I should have said no sign of distant metastasis because he says he is Stage III c.

                                  Gene_S
                                  Participant

                                    Hello Buffcody,

                                    My husband had mets on his head and had 3 surgeries on the head and one on the neck.  He had WLE and a SNB and they said it was all clear each time.  Then he got another unresectable met on the neck/head are at the cervical spine 1 and 2.  Upon scans found he also had mets in the liver and lungs.  His brain MRIs were always clear and still are.  He had his first surgery 5+ years ago.  

                                    So your statement of being more likely to have brain mets is not necessarily true.

                                    Judy (loving wife of Gene Stage IV and now NED)

                                    Gene_S
                                    Participant

                                      Hello Buffcody,

                                      My husband had mets on his head and had 3 surgeries on the head and one on the neck.  He had WLE and a SNB and they said it was all clear each time.  Then he got another unresectable met on the neck/head are at the cervical spine 1 and 2.  Upon scans found he also had mets in the liver and lungs.  His brain MRIs were always clear and still are.  He had his first surgery 5+ years ago.  

                                      So your statement of being more likely to have brain mets is not necessarily true.

                                      Judy (loving wife of Gene Stage IV and now NED)

                                      Gene_S
                                      Participant

                                        Hello Buffcody,

                                        My husband had mets on his head and had 3 surgeries on the head and one on the neck.  He had WLE and a SNB and they said it was all clear each time.  Then he got another unresectable met on the neck/head are at the cervical spine 1 and 2.  Upon scans found he also had mets in the liver and lungs.  His brain MRIs were always clear and still are.  He had his first surgery 5+ years ago.  

                                        So your statement of being more likely to have brain mets is not necessarily true.

                                        Judy (loving wife of Gene Stage IV and now NED)

                                        buffcody
                                        Participant

                                          I don't think the kind of radiation Steve's doctors would be suggesting at this time would be radiation of the brain. Also, not claiming any expert knowledge of this myself, I would not think someone having melanoma on the head would be anymore likely to have mets to the brain than anyone else with metastatic melanoma.  And I don't get the impression that Steve's melanoma is State IV.  But I don't have an answer to Steve's original question.

                                        Becky C.
                                        Participant

                                          Hi,Steve. My name is Becky and I am from Jackson, Ms. I have been stage IV since last October. They found six brain mets at that time, one the size of an egg. I had a craniotomy on the large one and had it safely removed. I had WBR on the other little ones, ending withSTR. AS of my last pet scan, my brain is stable.If I were in your position, i would definitely go forward with radiation, its just too close to the brain.  Melanoma has a mind of its own, it is very unpredictable. The equipment they used on me was called Brainlab. Its supposed to be the latest state of the art. you may want to ask that question. Good luck with whatever you decide. if you have any other questions let me know.

                                          Becky C.
                                          Participant

                                            Hi,Steve. My name is Becky and I am from Jackson, Ms. I have been stage IV since last October. They found six brain mets at that time, one the size of an egg. I had a craniotomy on the large one and had it safely removed. I had WBR on the other little ones, ending withSTR. AS of my last pet scan, my brain is stable.If I were in your position, i would definitely go forward with radiation, its just too close to the brain.  Melanoma has a mind of its own, it is very unpredictable. The equipment they used on me was called Brainlab. Its supposed to be the latest state of the art. you may want to ask that question. Good luck with whatever you decide. if you have any other questions let me know.

                                            scots
                                            Participant
                                              Steve,
                                              I had WLE on the back of my head, SNB was negative. I had 5 sessions of radiation to the back of my head. About 2 1/2 years ago. I was also two months in to interferon treatment so I cannot really say how bad the fatigue would have been without interferon. I did lose hair in the area that received the radiation and really has not come back yet. The radiation I received was not to the brain only to the tissue. I opted to do what the doctors suggested and do not have any regrets. I also got a second opinion with a radiologist at UVA medical center. He also recommend radiation treatment. I hope all goes well at your appt.

                                              Scot

                                              scots
                                              Participant
                                                Steve,
                                                I had WLE on the back of my head, SNB was negative. I had 5 sessions of radiation to the back of my head. About 2 1/2 years ago. I was also two months in to interferon treatment so I cannot really say how bad the fatigue would have been without interferon. I did lose hair in the area that received the radiation and really has not come back yet. The radiation I received was not to the brain only to the tissue. I opted to do what the doctors suggested and do not have any regrets. I also got a second opinion with a radiologist at UVA medical center. He also recommend radiation treatment. I hope all goes well at your appt.

                                                Scot

                                                scots
                                                Participant
                                                  Steve,
                                                  I had WLE on the back of my head, SNB was negative. I had 5 sessions of radiation to the back of my head. About 2 1/2 years ago. I was also two months in to interferon treatment so I cannot really say how bad the fatigue would have been without interferon. I did lose hair in the area that received the radiation and really has not come back yet. The radiation I received was not to the brain only to the tissue. I opted to do what the doctors suggested and do not have any regrets. I also got a second opinion with a radiologist at UVA medical center. He also recommend radiation treatment. I hope all goes well at your appt.

                                                  Scot

                                                  audgator
                                                  Participant

                                                    Steve, I've posted this before but I will copy it here as it sounds like you are talking about the same area:

                                                    My original oncologist, in preparing me for what was coming after surgery, had described a focused radiation treatment with little side effects. I then had the neck nodes (20+) resection done at Moffitt and the surgeon referred me to a radiation center where they described a wider area of radiation and many more treatments. They warned me of a loss of taste buds.  I went back to the original oncologist who referred me to a colleague in his hospital who ended up doing a more focused, higher-dosed treatment with fewer sessions.  I don't remember any side effects and my taste is just fine.  My neck is still stiff but I am sure that is from the surgery. 

                                                    I will add now the one side effect is I don't have to shave that side of my neck, helpful because surgery left it uncomfortable to touch. No, no fatigue.  My cancer spread anyway but I don't regret the radiation.   Dan

                                                    audgator
                                                    Participant

                                                      Steve, I've posted this before but I will copy it here as it sounds like you are talking about the same area:

                                                      My original oncologist, in preparing me for what was coming after surgery, had described a focused radiation treatment with little side effects. I then had the neck nodes (20+) resection done at Moffitt and the surgeon referred me to a radiation center where they described a wider area of radiation and many more treatments. They warned me of a loss of taste buds.  I went back to the original oncologist who referred me to a colleague in his hospital who ended up doing a more focused, higher-dosed treatment with fewer sessions.  I don't remember any side effects and my taste is just fine.  My neck is still stiff but I am sure that is from the surgery. 

                                                      I will add now the one side effect is I don't have to shave that side of my neck, helpful because surgery left it uncomfortable to touch. No, no fatigue.  My cancer spread anyway but I don't regret the radiation.   Dan

                                                      audgator
                                                      Participant

                                                        Steve, I've posted this before but I will copy it here as it sounds like you are talking about the same area:

                                                        My original oncologist, in preparing me for what was coming after surgery, had described a focused radiation treatment with little side effects. I then had the neck nodes (20+) resection done at Moffitt and the surgeon referred me to a radiation center where they described a wider area of radiation and many more treatments. They warned me of a loss of taste buds.  I went back to the original oncologist who referred me to a colleague in his hospital who ended up doing a more focused, higher-dosed treatment with fewer sessions.  I don't remember any side effects and my taste is just fine.  My neck is still stiff but I am sure that is from the surgery. 

                                                        I will add now the one side effect is I don't have to shave that side of my neck, helpful because surgery left it uncomfortable to touch. No, no fatigue.  My cancer spread anyway but I don't regret the radiation.   Dan

                                                        doro
                                                        Participant

                                                          Hi Steve,

                                                          Glad to hear you are continuing to recover well from the surgery!

                                                          As you may remember, my dad's case was similar to yours except that he had a bilateral neck dissection (5 positive nodes total). We received very mixed recommendations regarding radiation. Out of four oncologists, three were "not big fans" of radiation and were not in favor of him doing it. These three were all melanoma specialists. The fourth oncologist (his original oncologist) was willing to do it after the Kaiser tumor board recommended it. Dad elected to start interferon and meet with a new radiation oncologist (he switched insurance in order to see more melanoma specialists) to consider doing radiation after the first month of high dose and before the 11 months of low dose interferon (which is where we are now).

                                                          From what I understand, there is no evidence that confirms the definite benefit of radiation, which is why oncologists can be rather mixed on it. We had oncologists cite studies that suggested positive and negatiev benefits. The upshot seems to be that radiation can help prevent a local recurrence but has not been proven to have an impact on overall survival. Depending on the expected negative effect of radiation (stiffness, fatigue, etc) and length of these effects (some can be permanent), a couple oncologists talked to us about quality of life. I remember one said something like "You may want to weigh the certain negative effects of radiation with the possible negative effects of a local recurrence." That's not to say don't do it but was a rather insightful comment for us. We also considered the positive psychological benefits of doing something proactive to try and prevent a local recurrence. Also, as has been discussed here, brain mets would not count as local recurrence — we were told the skull is so thick that any appearance of cancer in the brain would be considered distance spread.

                                                          As with much of this new cancer world we find ourselves in, I think the decision to do radiation is personal and may make sense to/for some people but not everyone. Best of luck!

                                                          doro
                                                          Participant

                                                            Hi Steve,

                                                            Glad to hear you are continuing to recover well from the surgery!

                                                            As you may remember, my dad's case was similar to yours except that he had a bilateral neck dissection (5 positive nodes total). We received very mixed recommendations regarding radiation. Out of four oncologists, three were "not big fans" of radiation and were not in favor of him doing it. These three were all melanoma specialists. The fourth oncologist (his original oncologist) was willing to do it after the Kaiser tumor board recommended it. Dad elected to start interferon and meet with a new radiation oncologist (he switched insurance in order to see more melanoma specialists) to consider doing radiation after the first month of high dose and before the 11 months of low dose interferon (which is where we are now).

                                                            From what I understand, there is no evidence that confirms the definite benefit of radiation, which is why oncologists can be rather mixed on it. We had oncologists cite studies that suggested positive and negatiev benefits. The upshot seems to be that radiation can help prevent a local recurrence but has not been proven to have an impact on overall survival. Depending on the expected negative effect of radiation (stiffness, fatigue, etc) and length of these effects (some can be permanent), a couple oncologists talked to us about quality of life. I remember one said something like "You may want to weigh the certain negative effects of radiation with the possible negative effects of a local recurrence." That's not to say don't do it but was a rather insightful comment for us. We also considered the positive psychological benefits of doing something proactive to try and prevent a local recurrence. Also, as has been discussed here, brain mets would not count as local recurrence — we were told the skull is so thick that any appearance of cancer in the brain would be considered distance spread.

                                                            As with much of this new cancer world we find ourselves in, I think the decision to do radiation is personal and may make sense to/for some people but not everyone. Best of luck!

                                                            doro
                                                            Participant

                                                              Hi Steve,

                                                              Glad to hear you are continuing to recover well from the surgery!

                                                              As you may remember, my dad's case was similar to yours except that he had a bilateral neck dissection (5 positive nodes total). We received very mixed recommendations regarding radiation. Out of four oncologists, three were "not big fans" of radiation and were not in favor of him doing it. These three were all melanoma specialists. The fourth oncologist (his original oncologist) was willing to do it after the Kaiser tumor board recommended it. Dad elected to start interferon and meet with a new radiation oncologist (he switched insurance in order to see more melanoma specialists) to consider doing radiation after the first month of high dose and before the 11 months of low dose interferon (which is where we are now).

                                                              From what I understand, there is no evidence that confirms the definite benefit of radiation, which is why oncologists can be rather mixed on it. We had oncologists cite studies that suggested positive and negatiev benefits. The upshot seems to be that radiation can help prevent a local recurrence but has not been proven to have an impact on overall survival. Depending on the expected negative effect of radiation (stiffness, fatigue, etc) and length of these effects (some can be permanent), a couple oncologists talked to us about quality of life. I remember one said something like "You may want to weigh the certain negative effects of radiation with the possible negative effects of a local recurrence." That's not to say don't do it but was a rather insightful comment for us. We also considered the positive psychological benefits of doing something proactive to try and prevent a local recurrence. Also, as has been discussed here, brain mets would not count as local recurrence — we were told the skull is so thick that any appearance of cancer in the brain would be considered distance spread.

                                                              As with much of this new cancer world we find ourselves in, I think the decision to do radiation is personal and may make sense to/for some people but not everyone. Best of luck!

                                                                SteveT
                                                                Participant

                                                                  Hello,

                                                                  Thank you so much for your responses. The diversity of opinions is exactly what I wanted. I was especially interested to hear that there are oncologists who may not be "big fans" of radiation. I know every case is different, but I guess I figured most doctors fell into the "more treatment is better treatment" camp. I wonder if this is a case of Kaiser physicians being on salary and others working from a fee-for-service basis (waaaaay off topic, but still I wonder).

                                                                  Doro, how is it your father was able to consult with so many oncologists? Does Kaiser provide for second and third opinions?

                                                                  Feeling great. A bit of neck stiffness but yoga and stretching and walking have done wonders.

                                                                  Off to Chapel Hill in a few hours for my morning follow up with the surgeon and the radiologist appointment.

                                                                  Many thanks, Steve

                                                                  SteveT
                                                                  Participant

                                                                    Hello,

                                                                    Thank you so much for your responses. The diversity of opinions is exactly what I wanted. I was especially interested to hear that there are oncologists who may not be "big fans" of radiation. I know every case is different, but I guess I figured most doctors fell into the "more treatment is better treatment" camp. I wonder if this is a case of Kaiser physicians being on salary and others working from a fee-for-service basis (waaaaay off topic, but still I wonder).

                                                                    Doro, how is it your father was able to consult with so many oncologists? Does Kaiser provide for second and third opinions?

                                                                    Feeling great. A bit of neck stiffness but yoga and stretching and walking have done wonders.

                                                                    Off to Chapel Hill in a few hours for my morning follow up with the surgeon and the radiologist appointment.

                                                                    Many thanks, Steve

                                                                    SteveT
                                                                    Participant

                                                                      Hello,

                                                                      Thank you so much for your responses. The diversity of opinions is exactly what I wanted. I was especially interested to hear that there are oncologists who may not be "big fans" of radiation. I know every case is different, but I guess I figured most doctors fell into the "more treatment is better treatment" camp. I wonder if this is a case of Kaiser physicians being on salary and others working from a fee-for-service basis (waaaaay off topic, but still I wonder).

                                                                      Doro, how is it your father was able to consult with so many oncologists? Does Kaiser provide for second and third opinions?

                                                                      Feeling great. A bit of neck stiffness but yoga and stretching and walking have done wonders.

                                                                      Off to Chapel Hill in a few hours for my morning follow up with the surgeon and the radiologist appointment.

                                                                      Many thanks, Steve

                                                                      doro
                                                                      Participant

                                                                        Steve,

                                                                        My dad was with Kaiser through a Medicare Advantage plan at the time of his diagnosis and was assigned an oncologist there. My parents paid out-of-pocket for a consult with a melanoma specialist in December (about $500). In January, he switched to a Medicare plan with an Anthem supplement and saw two oncologists before deciding on one of them for his treatment.

                                                                        We were definitely concerned about how many opinions insurance would cover. The Kaiser oncologist was not very helpful; he was unable to say if Kaiser would cover it and said we would have to have the appointment and then see what the insurance billing people decided. He did suggest that Kaiser would be more likely to cover the consult if the outside oncologist could offer some special treatment (e.g., a trial) that Kaiser could not offer. From reading the stories of others on this board, it seems that other Kaiser oncologists have been more proactive about referring out.

                                                                        I'm not sure if you are on Medicare but will provide some info in case it is helpful. I did do some researching about Medicare coverage for second, third, etc opinions. The rules seem to suggest that if the second opinion differs from the first, Medicare may cover a third. In my father's case, the first oncologist was suggesting radiation, and interferon. The second oncologist said he would not recommend radiation and suggested Dad enter his clinical trial (the ECOG trial with ipi and interferon that some others on this board are doing). So we were hopeful Medicare would cover another opinion. However, I'm not a Medicare expert and obviously can't guarantee anything. Most offices have billing departments that can answer questions about coverage that might be helpful to contact.

                                                                        As per usual, an overly-long response but hopefully it is helpful! Glad to hear the stretching helps with the stiffness. Hope your appointment today was informative.

                                                                        doro
                                                                        Participant

                                                                          Steve,

                                                                          My dad was with Kaiser through a Medicare Advantage plan at the time of his diagnosis and was assigned an oncologist there. My parents paid out-of-pocket for a consult with a melanoma specialist in December (about $500). In January, he switched to a Medicare plan with an Anthem supplement and saw two oncologists before deciding on one of them for his treatment.

                                                                          We were definitely concerned about how many opinions insurance would cover. The Kaiser oncologist was not very helpful; he was unable to say if Kaiser would cover it and said we would have to have the appointment and then see what the insurance billing people decided. He did suggest that Kaiser would be more likely to cover the consult if the outside oncologist could offer some special treatment (e.g., a trial) that Kaiser could not offer. From reading the stories of others on this board, it seems that other Kaiser oncologists have been more proactive about referring out.

                                                                          I'm not sure if you are on Medicare but will provide some info in case it is helpful. I did do some researching about Medicare coverage for second, third, etc opinions. The rules seem to suggest that if the second opinion differs from the first, Medicare may cover a third. In my father's case, the first oncologist was suggesting radiation, and interferon. The second oncologist said he would not recommend radiation and suggested Dad enter his clinical trial (the ECOG trial with ipi and interferon that some others on this board are doing). So we were hopeful Medicare would cover another opinion. However, I'm not a Medicare expert and obviously can't guarantee anything. Most offices have billing departments that can answer questions about coverage that might be helpful to contact.

                                                                          As per usual, an overly-long response but hopefully it is helpful! Glad to hear the stretching helps with the stiffness. Hope your appointment today was informative.

                                                                          doro
                                                                          Participant

                                                                            Steve,

                                                                            My dad was with Kaiser through a Medicare Advantage plan at the time of his diagnosis and was assigned an oncologist there. My parents paid out-of-pocket for a consult with a melanoma specialist in December (about $500). In January, he switched to a Medicare plan with an Anthem supplement and saw two oncologists before deciding on one of them for his treatment.

                                                                            We were definitely concerned about how many opinions insurance would cover. The Kaiser oncologist was not very helpful; he was unable to say if Kaiser would cover it and said we would have to have the appointment and then see what the insurance billing people decided. He did suggest that Kaiser would be more likely to cover the consult if the outside oncologist could offer some special treatment (e.g., a trial) that Kaiser could not offer. From reading the stories of others on this board, it seems that other Kaiser oncologists have been more proactive about referring out.

                                                                            I'm not sure if you are on Medicare but will provide some info in case it is helpful. I did do some researching about Medicare coverage for second, third, etc opinions. The rules seem to suggest that if the second opinion differs from the first, Medicare may cover a third. In my father's case, the first oncologist was suggesting radiation, and interferon. The second oncologist said he would not recommend radiation and suggested Dad enter his clinical trial (the ECOG trial with ipi and interferon that some others on this board are doing). So we were hopeful Medicare would cover another opinion. However, I'm not a Medicare expert and obviously can't guarantee anything. Most offices have billing departments that can answer questions about coverage that might be helpful to contact.

                                                                            As per usual, an overly-long response but hopefully it is helpful! Glad to hear the stretching helps with the stiffness. Hope your appointment today was informative.

                                                                          buckytom
                                                                          Participant

                                                                            Steve – I was diagnosed in January of this year – had neck dissection in mid-January. I saw my local medical and radiation oncologist and the radiation onlcologist suggested focused radiation in neck/shoulder area, medical oncologist recommended Interferon. I decided since this was all new to me I needed a second opinion and went to Mayo clinic where I saw Dr. Markovic and Lisa Kottschade, R.N. After a thorough review of my scans etc they did agree with the local radiation – and referenced an MD Anderson Study that demonstrated a very positive effect on LOCAL reoccurence – can't remember the percentages exactly but without there is a 30% chance of reoccurence – with radiation I believe it was less then 5%.

                                                                            So, there was then two options of radiation – low fraction for 5 weeks/5 days a week or high fraction for 5 treatments of 2 1/2 weeks. Based on the recommendation from Mayo I chose the shorter duration/higher fraction route. I started on March 11 and finished 9 days ago – on March 25. The side effects: my treatments were at 3:00 in the afternoon – by 6:00 I was wiped out and basically slept until 7:00 the next morning. For me (all people are different) – I had naseau for the next day – but felt pretty decent by the 2nd day after treatment. I missed about 2-4 hours of work after each of the 5 treatments. I did not completely lose my taste – but had a very metallic taste in the back of my mouth. Also have dry mouth – but that is not really that bad. My skin got very red – but only mildly sensitive – no peeling etc. 9 days after treatment and I am feeling very good – full appetite – no throat soreness at all. Start losing my hair on the very bottom of my hairline – abut a 2" x 2" patch (was told this would happen) – but again very minor. 

                                                                            In short – I would recommend the treatment and would do it again. My radiation oncologist was extremely detailed – spent a lot of time developing the plan to limit the side effects. He said he consulted with someone at MD Anderson to get the best treatment plan – with minimal side effects. As for next steps – Mayo does not perscribe Interferon – instead recommend Leukine. I am starting that treatment for 3 years (14 days on/14 days off) in the next two weeks. Suppose to have minimal side effects and has shown to be very effective.

                                                                            Good luck to you – it is all a lot to absourb. I will pray for the best for you!

                                                                            buckytom
                                                                            Participant

                                                                              Steve – I was diagnosed in January of this year – had neck dissection in mid-January. I saw my local medical and radiation oncologist and the radiation onlcologist suggested focused radiation in neck/shoulder area, medical oncologist recommended Interferon. I decided since this was all new to me I needed a second opinion and went to Mayo clinic where I saw Dr. Markovic and Lisa Kottschade, R.N. After a thorough review of my scans etc they did agree with the local radiation – and referenced an MD Anderson Study that demonstrated a very positive effect on LOCAL reoccurence – can't remember the percentages exactly but without there is a 30% chance of reoccurence – with radiation I believe it was less then 5%.

                                                                              So, there was then two options of radiation – low fraction for 5 weeks/5 days a week or high fraction for 5 treatments of 2 1/2 weeks. Based on the recommendation from Mayo I chose the shorter duration/higher fraction route. I started on March 11 and finished 9 days ago – on March 25. The side effects: my treatments were at 3:00 in the afternoon – by 6:00 I was wiped out and basically slept until 7:00 the next morning. For me (all people are different) – I had naseau for the next day – but felt pretty decent by the 2nd day after treatment. I missed about 2-4 hours of work after each of the 5 treatments. I did not completely lose my taste – but had a very metallic taste in the back of my mouth. Also have dry mouth – but that is not really that bad. My skin got very red – but only mildly sensitive – no peeling etc. 9 days after treatment and I am feeling very good – full appetite – no throat soreness at all. Start losing my hair on the very bottom of my hairline – abut a 2" x 2" patch (was told this would happen) – but again very minor. 

                                                                              In short – I would recommend the treatment and would do it again. My radiation oncologist was extremely detailed – spent a lot of time developing the plan to limit the side effects. He said he consulted with someone at MD Anderson to get the best treatment plan – with minimal side effects. As for next steps – Mayo does not perscribe Interferon – instead recommend Leukine. I am starting that treatment for 3 years (14 days on/14 days off) in the next two weeks. Suppose to have minimal side effects and has shown to be very effective.

                                                                              Good luck to you – it is all a lot to absourb. I will pray for the best for you!

                                                                              buckytom
                                                                              Participant

                                                                                Steve – I was diagnosed in January of this year – had neck dissection in mid-January. I saw my local medical and radiation oncologist and the radiation onlcologist suggested focused radiation in neck/shoulder area, medical oncologist recommended Interferon. I decided since this was all new to me I needed a second opinion and went to Mayo clinic where I saw Dr. Markovic and Lisa Kottschade, R.N. After a thorough review of my scans etc they did agree with the local radiation – and referenced an MD Anderson Study that demonstrated a very positive effect on LOCAL reoccurence – can't remember the percentages exactly but without there is a 30% chance of reoccurence – with radiation I believe it was less then 5%.

                                                                                So, there was then two options of radiation – low fraction for 5 weeks/5 days a week or high fraction for 5 treatments of 2 1/2 weeks. Based on the recommendation from Mayo I chose the shorter duration/higher fraction route. I started on March 11 and finished 9 days ago – on March 25. The side effects: my treatments were at 3:00 in the afternoon – by 6:00 I was wiped out and basically slept until 7:00 the next morning. For me (all people are different) – I had naseau for the next day – but felt pretty decent by the 2nd day after treatment. I missed about 2-4 hours of work after each of the 5 treatments. I did not completely lose my taste – but had a very metallic taste in the back of my mouth. Also have dry mouth – but that is not really that bad. My skin got very red – but only mildly sensitive – no peeling etc. 9 days after treatment and I am feeling very good – full appetite – no throat soreness at all. Start losing my hair on the very bottom of my hairline – abut a 2" x 2" patch (was told this would happen) – but again very minor. 

                                                                                In short – I would recommend the treatment and would do it again. My radiation oncologist was extremely detailed – spent a lot of time developing the plan to limit the side effects. He said he consulted with someone at MD Anderson to get the best treatment plan – with minimal side effects. As for next steps – Mayo does not perscribe Interferon – instead recommend Leukine. I am starting that treatment for 3 years (14 days on/14 days off) in the next two weeks. Suppose to have minimal side effects and has shown to be very effective.

                                                                                Good luck to you – it is all a lot to absourb. I will pray for the best for you!

                                                                                Tamils
                                                                                Participant

                                                                                  Just to throw this into the mix, my father had a tumor removed from his skull in November (metastasized, but the only melanoma site known at that time, and the first notice we had had of it).  The radiation oncologist told him that without radiation, there was a 1 in 3 chance that the cancer would return at that site, and with radiation, a 1 in 6 chance.  (Sorry, no study citations.)  He was told the radiation would have no effect on occurrence at other sites, but of course in his case, the cancer had already metastasized.  He had a short 2-week course of radiation to the site on his head with very minor side effects.  Hair loss that seems permanent so far, slight redness/ dryness to the site, a little fatigue.  No regrets about radiation, no return of the melanoma at that site.

                                                                                  Tamils
                                                                                  Participant

                                                                                    Just to throw this into the mix, my father had a tumor removed from his skull in November (metastasized, but the only melanoma site known at that time, and the first notice we had had of it).  The radiation oncologist told him that without radiation, there was a 1 in 3 chance that the cancer would return at that site, and with radiation, a 1 in 6 chance.  (Sorry, no study citations.)  He was told the radiation would have no effect on occurrence at other sites, but of course in his case, the cancer had already metastasized.  He had a short 2-week course of radiation to the site on his head with very minor side effects.  Hair loss that seems permanent so far, slight redness/ dryness to the site, a little fatigue.  No regrets about radiation, no return of the melanoma at that site.

                                                                                    Tamils
                                                                                    Participant

                                                                                      Just to throw this into the mix, my father had a tumor removed from his skull in November (metastasized, but the only melanoma site known at that time, and the first notice we had had of it).  The radiation oncologist told him that without radiation, there was a 1 in 3 chance that the cancer would return at that site, and with radiation, a 1 in 6 chance.  (Sorry, no study citations.)  He was told the radiation would have no effect on occurrence at other sites, but of course in his case, the cancer had already metastasized.  He had a short 2-week course of radiation to the site on his head with very minor side effects.  Hair loss that seems permanent so far, slight redness/ dryness to the site, a little fatigue.  No regrets about radiation, no return of the melanoma at that site.

                                                                                      SteveT
                                                                                      Participant

                                                                                        Hello,

                                                                                        Thanks for the in depth accounts. It has been very helpful. During my follow up appointments last week I met with a radiologist, Dr. Marks, who said he felt the surgery brought me to a 50% likelihood of being cancer free. Going through radiation would get me another 7%. Sometimes an extra 7% doesn't seem like enough gain to go through the hassle and side effects of radiation. Sometimes 7% seems like an enormous gain for a few weeks of mild inconvenience. The numbers seemed like they were being shot from the hip. Still vacillating…

                                                                                        Steve

                                                                                        SteveT
                                                                                        Participant

                                                                                          Hello,

                                                                                          Thanks for the in depth accounts. It has been very helpful. During my follow up appointments last week I met with a radiologist, Dr. Marks, who said he felt the surgery brought me to a 50% likelihood of being cancer free. Going through radiation would get me another 7%. Sometimes an extra 7% doesn't seem like enough gain to go through the hassle and side effects of radiation. Sometimes 7% seems like an enormous gain for a few weeks of mild inconvenience. The numbers seemed like they were being shot from the hip. Still vacillating…

                                                                                          Steve

                                                                                          SteveT
                                                                                          Participant

                                                                                            Hello,

                                                                                            Thanks for the in depth accounts. It has been very helpful. During my follow up appointments last week I met with a radiologist, Dr. Marks, who said he felt the surgery brought me to a 50% likelihood of being cancer free. Going through radiation would get me another 7%. Sometimes an extra 7% doesn't seem like enough gain to go through the hassle and side effects of radiation. Sometimes 7% seems like an enormous gain for a few weeks of mild inconvenience. The numbers seemed like they were being shot from the hip. Still vacillating…

                                                                                            Steve

                                                                                        Viewing 20 reply threads
                                                                                        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                                                                                        About the MRF Patient Forum

                                                                                        The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                                                                                        The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                                                                                        Popular Topics