› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Question: Do all invasive melanomas form a tumor bump/raised?
- This topic has 9 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 10 months ago by Janner.
- Post
-
- June 12, 2012 at 7:08 pm
Once melanoma enters the VGP, does that mean that the mole starts to raise up or form a visible tumor? Can a VGP melanoma be flat?
Once melanoma enters the VGP, does that mean that the mole starts to raise up or form a visible tumor? Can a VGP melanoma be flat?
- Replies
-
-
- June 12, 2012 at 11:27 pm
Typically Mel follows the ABCs but there are always exceptions. Mine was one and I am sure there are many more on the board. My tumor was 3.7mm deep but relatively flat, in fact had no indicators at all. It would not have been removed except for the fact it itched. I know there are at least two other people on the board that had the exact same experience. There are guidelines, as with anything medical, there are no hard and fast rules so don't drive yourself crazy trying to find them.
Mary
Stage 3
-
- June 12, 2012 at 11:27 pm
Typically Mel follows the ABCs but there are always exceptions. Mine was one and I am sure there are many more on the board. My tumor was 3.7mm deep but relatively flat, in fact had no indicators at all. It would not have been removed except for the fact it itched. I know there are at least two other people on the board that had the exact same experience. There are guidelines, as with anything medical, there are no hard and fast rules so don't drive yourself crazy trying to find them.
Mary
Stage 3
-
- June 12, 2012 at 11:27 pm
Typically Mel follows the ABCs but there are always exceptions. Mine was one and I am sure there are many more on the board. My tumor was 3.7mm deep but relatively flat, in fact had no indicators at all. It would not have been removed except for the fact it itched. I know there are at least two other people on the board that had the exact same experience. There are guidelines, as with anything medical, there are no hard and fast rules so don't drive yourself crazy trying to find them.
Mary
Stage 3
-
- June 13, 2012 at 12:43 am
There is no direct correlation that I've ever seen between "raised" and VGP". Vertical growth phase seems to be a more recent area of interest and more may be known about it and researched in the future. And yes, a lesion can be flat and also have VGP. It can also be tiny or quite large. If something "raises", it answers the "Change" rule and is a candidate for biopsy. But being raised by itself is not any indication of the underlying lesion's particulars.
-
- June 13, 2012 at 12:43 am
There is no direct correlation that I've ever seen between "raised" and VGP". Vertical growth phase seems to be a more recent area of interest and more may be known about it and researched in the future. And yes, a lesion can be flat and also have VGP. It can also be tiny or quite large. If something "raises", it answers the "Change" rule and is a candidate for biopsy. But being raised by itself is not any indication of the underlying lesion's particulars.
-
- June 13, 2012 at 12:43 am
There is no direct correlation that I've ever seen between "raised" and VGP". Vertical growth phase seems to be a more recent area of interest and more may be known about it and researched in the future. And yes, a lesion can be flat and also have VGP. It can also be tiny or quite large. If something "raises", it answers the "Change" rule and is a candidate for biopsy. But being raised by itself is not any indication of the underlying lesion's particulars.
-
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.