› Forums › General Melanoma Community › prognosis stage 3
- This topic has 48 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 2 months ago by JustJaren.
- Post
- Replies
-
-
- February 3, 2016 at 7:49 pm
You can look at the breakout of the different stages here. Stage 3a has better prognosis than 3b and likewise with 3c. You can find the variation in the table at this site.
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2007147-overview
-
- February 3, 2016 at 7:49 pm
You can look at the breakout of the different stages here. Stage 3a has better prognosis than 3b and likewise with 3c. You can find the variation in the table at this site.
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2007147-overview
-
- February 3, 2016 at 7:49 pm
You can look at the breakout of the different stages here. Stage 3a has better prognosis than 3b and likewise with 3c. You can find the variation in the table at this site.
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2007147-overview
-
- February 3, 2016 at 8:21 pm
Those survival stats look so grim.50 percent for 5 years. Breast cancer stage 3 is around 70 percent. Is melanoma more aggressive then breast cancer.-
- February 3, 2016 at 8:31 pm
There have been several new treatments released for melanoma within the past 5 years. Prior to that, it was 13 years where no new treatments were introduced. THere are NO survival statistics that are accurate anymore because all those statistics currently printed will not include the latest technologies and treatments available. These new treatments have better success rates than any prior treatment and will affect survival curves.
Melanoma is considered very aggressive once it has spread, unfortunately.
-
- February 3, 2016 at 8:31 pm
There have been several new treatments released for melanoma within the past 5 years. Prior to that, it was 13 years where no new treatments were introduced. THere are NO survival statistics that are accurate anymore because all those statistics currently printed will not include the latest technologies and treatments available. These new treatments have better success rates than any prior treatment and will affect survival curves.
Melanoma is considered very aggressive once it has spread, unfortunately.
-
- February 3, 2016 at 8:31 pm
There have been several new treatments released for melanoma within the past 5 years. Prior to that, it was 13 years where no new treatments were introduced. THere are NO survival statistics that are accurate anymore because all those statistics currently printed will not include the latest technologies and treatments available. These new treatments have better success rates than any prior treatment and will affect survival curves.
Melanoma is considered very aggressive once it has spread, unfortunately.
-
- February 3, 2016 at 8:41 pm
Dear Anon, stats are hard to predict today, with all the new treatment options Including Immunotherapy and targeted therapy. I was given 5 to 7 months in July of 2013 if I went by the stats at that time, cyberknife and a clinical trial of Immunotherapy has changed that big time. Feel free to lose the Anon title, the members on the board don't bite!!! Ed
-
- February 3, 2016 at 8:41 pm
Dear Anon, stats are hard to predict today, with all the new treatment options Including Immunotherapy and targeted therapy. I was given 5 to 7 months in July of 2013 if I went by the stats at that time, cyberknife and a clinical trial of Immunotherapy has changed that big time. Feel free to lose the Anon title, the members on the board don't bite!!! Ed
-
- February 3, 2016 at 8:41 pm
Dear Anon, stats are hard to predict today, with all the new treatment options Including Immunotherapy and targeted therapy. I was given 5 to 7 months in July of 2013 if I went by the stats at that time, cyberknife and a clinical trial of Immunotherapy has changed that big time. Feel free to lose the Anon title, the members on the board don't bite!!! Ed
-
- February 3, 2016 at 9:03 pm
I guess I gotta stop looking at these old statistics with the new drugs and technologies out. It’s just scary that’s all . I’m sure people are living longer with melanoma.-
- February 4, 2016 at 12:29 am
Fighters are not statistics, GOD Is The ONLY ONE who knows our time to go home. Just keep fighting and live life. Peace and blessings. -
- February 4, 2016 at 12:29 am
Fighters are not statistics, GOD Is The ONLY ONE who knows our time to go home. Just keep fighting and live life. Peace and blessings. -
- February 4, 2016 at 1:50 am
I love this. Thanks for sharing. Such a refreshing thought when I often feel out of control with this disease. HE is in control.
Allyson
-
- February 4, 2016 at 1:50 am
I love this. Thanks for sharing. Such a refreshing thought when I often feel out of control with this disease. HE is in control.
Allyson
-
- February 4, 2016 at 1:50 am
I love this. Thanks for sharing. Such a refreshing thought when I often feel out of control with this disease. HE is in control.
Allyson
-
- February 4, 2016 at 12:29 am
Fighters are not statistics, GOD Is The ONLY ONE who knows our time to go home. Just keep fighting and live life. Peace and blessings.
-
- February 4, 2016 at 9:48 am
Statistics are just that and nothing more. When it comes down to the individual all bets are off. "I" am not a statistic.
Yes stage 3 melanoma is worse than breast cancer, and most patients will progress in spite of the newer treatments. That being said, more advanced melanoma patients are living longer overall with the new drug therapies. It is too early with these new therapies to change the stats, but they are better.
All the stats can do is force you to get your life in order, then go on and live. Live life with more purpose, don't put off things you really want to do, make the most of the time you have. Heck you might be killed from above with "blue ice" tomorrow.
The numbers are depressing, but you don't have to be. For me when I advanced from stage IIA to stage IV eight years later and with a 2 & 4 year old at home, in some ways it was freeing. I felt fine, had minimal tumor burden, and no longer had to save for my retirement! Everything else from that point on was for my girls.
Luckily, I am not a statistic. I have been in a durable remission after lung surgery and IL-2. This summer will be 6 years NED. Yup, I am in the 3% club. 6% complete responders of which half will never have a recurrance = 3%.
Now I have to save for retirement AND college for both my girls – LOL. Now I have to lose weight since I decided to HAVE that piece of cake AND another beer. Oh well…….. Was worth it. The limbo inbetween, not knowing where I would fall in overall survival, that was the hardest. Do I save for the future or take the kids on a road trip across the U.S. in an RV and create memories instead? I couldn't do both.
Just plan for the worst, then grab life by the short hairs and hang on for one heck of a party!
-
- February 4, 2016 at 9:48 am
Statistics are just that and nothing more. When it comes down to the individual all bets are off. "I" am not a statistic.
Yes stage 3 melanoma is worse than breast cancer, and most patients will progress in spite of the newer treatments. That being said, more advanced melanoma patients are living longer overall with the new drug therapies. It is too early with these new therapies to change the stats, but they are better.
All the stats can do is force you to get your life in order, then go on and live. Live life with more purpose, don't put off things you really want to do, make the most of the time you have. Heck you might be killed from above with "blue ice" tomorrow.
The numbers are depressing, but you don't have to be. For me when I advanced from stage IIA to stage IV eight years later and with a 2 & 4 year old at home, in some ways it was freeing. I felt fine, had minimal tumor burden, and no longer had to save for my retirement! Everything else from that point on was for my girls.
Luckily, I am not a statistic. I have been in a durable remission after lung surgery and IL-2. This summer will be 6 years NED. Yup, I am in the 3% club. 6% complete responders of which half will never have a recurrance = 3%.
Now I have to save for retirement AND college for both my girls – LOL. Now I have to lose weight since I decided to HAVE that piece of cake AND another beer. Oh well…….. Was worth it. The limbo inbetween, not knowing where I would fall in overall survival, that was the hardest. Do I save for the future or take the kids on a road trip across the U.S. in an RV and create memories instead? I couldn't do both.
Just plan for the worst, then grab life by the short hairs and hang on for one heck of a party!
-
- February 4, 2016 at 9:48 am
Statistics are just that and nothing more. When it comes down to the individual all bets are off. "I" am not a statistic.
Yes stage 3 melanoma is worse than breast cancer, and most patients will progress in spite of the newer treatments. That being said, more advanced melanoma patients are living longer overall with the new drug therapies. It is too early with these new therapies to change the stats, but they are better.
All the stats can do is force you to get your life in order, then go on and live. Live life with more purpose, don't put off things you really want to do, make the most of the time you have. Heck you might be killed from above with "blue ice" tomorrow.
The numbers are depressing, but you don't have to be. For me when I advanced from stage IIA to stage IV eight years later and with a 2 & 4 year old at home, in some ways it was freeing. I felt fine, had minimal tumor burden, and no longer had to save for my retirement! Everything else from that point on was for my girls.
Luckily, I am not a statistic. I have been in a durable remission after lung surgery and IL-2. This summer will be 6 years NED. Yup, I am in the 3% club. 6% complete responders of which half will never have a recurrance = 3%.
Now I have to save for retirement AND college for both my girls – LOL. Now I have to lose weight since I decided to HAVE that piece of cake AND another beer. Oh well…….. Was worth it. The limbo inbetween, not knowing where I would fall in overall survival, that was the hardest. Do I save for the future or take the kids on a road trip across the U.S. in an RV and create memories instead? I couldn't do both.
Just plan for the worst, then grab life by the short hairs and hang on for one heck of a party!
-
- February 5, 2016 at 12:17 am
Statistically it is correct that most stage 3 patients will progress.
There is a caveat and that being there is a wide variety classified within stage 3. eg stage 3a with a micromet in one node has good chance of not progressing whereas stage 3c will see most of those patients progress.
-
- February 5, 2016 at 12:17 am
Statistically it is correct that most stage 3 patients will progress.
There is a caveat and that being there is a wide variety classified within stage 3. eg stage 3a with a micromet in one node has good chance of not progressing whereas stage 3c will see most of those patients progress.
-
- February 5, 2016 at 12:17 am
Statistically it is correct that most stage 3 patients will progress.
There is a caveat and that being there is a wide variety classified within stage 3. eg stage 3a with a micromet in one node has good chance of not progressing whereas stage 3c will see most of those patients progress.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.