› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Possible Stage 1; PET Scan???
- This topic has 3 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 9 years ago by Janner.
- Post
-
- April 21, 2015 at 5:56 pm
Hello,
I unfortunately am not new here. Although, I have been fortunate that I have never gone to this board to get information for myself, I now need it for a second family member.
Here is what I know:
Diagnosed with superficial melanoma less than 1 millimeter thick. I have not seen the path report yet to know whether or not there was ulceration or what the mitotic rate is. The WLE was done last week and the path results are not yet in. Met with oncologists today and they are opting to do a PET Scan. Seems to me this would classified as Stage 1A or 1B and the SLND should be warranted.
Thoughts?
- Replies
-
-
- April 21, 2015 at 6:56 pm
Stage IA, no SNB. Stage IB, depends on what institution. Some still have cutoff values for depth for the SNB. PET scan is rarely done and does NOT replace a SNB. PET scans only see tumors of about 5mm or larger and would miss microscopic cells in a sentinel node. In fact, PET scans are rarely done for stage I at any time so that seems a bit out of whack to start.
-
- April 21, 2015 at 6:56 pm
Stage IA, no SNB. Stage IB, depends on what institution. Some still have cutoff values for depth for the SNB. PET scan is rarely done and does NOT replace a SNB. PET scans only see tumors of about 5mm or larger and would miss microscopic cells in a sentinel node. In fact, PET scans are rarely done for stage I at any time so that seems a bit out of whack to start.
-
- April 21, 2015 at 6:56 pm
Stage IA, no SNB. Stage IB, depends on what institution. Some still have cutoff values for depth for the SNB. PET scan is rarely done and does NOT replace a SNB. PET scans only see tumors of about 5mm or larger and would miss microscopic cells in a sentinel node. In fact, PET scans are rarely done for stage I at any time so that seems a bit out of whack to start.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.