› Forums › General Melanoma Community › pd-1 drug given breakthrough drug status
- This topic has 27 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 4 months ago by alankravitz.
- Post
-
- May 10, 2013 at 4:24 am
http://blogs.nature.com/spoonful/2013/04/melanoma-drug-joins-breakthrough-club.html
link to article regarding anti pd-1 drug from merck given breakthrough drug status…
Jeff
http://blogs.nature.com/spoonful/2013/04/melanoma-drug-joins-breakthrough-club.html
link to article regarding anti pd-1 drug from merck given breakthrough drug status…
Jeff
- Replies
-
-
- May 10, 2013 at 1:55 pm
To me the most interestion statement indicates that the Merck product is effective in patients that have not had a beneficial response to Yervoy– unlike BMSs Nivolumab counterpart. It’s the only time I’ve seen a distinction between these anti-PD-1 products in print. I haven’t heard whether they have a comparable statistic effectiveness. -
- May 10, 2013 at 1:55 pm
To me the most interestion statement indicates that the Merck product is effective in patients that have not had a beneficial response to Yervoy– unlike BMSs Nivolumab counterpart. It’s the only time I’ve seen a distinction between these anti-PD-1 products in print. I haven’t heard whether they have a comparable statistic effectiveness. -
- May 10, 2013 at 1:55 pm
To me the most interestion statement indicates that the Merck product is effective in patients that have not had a beneficial response to Yervoy– unlike BMSs Nivolumab counterpart. It’s the only time I’ve seen a distinction between these anti-PD-1 products in print. I haven’t heard whether they have a comparable statistic effectiveness.-
- May 12, 2013 at 4:37 am
if you read it carefully he stated "publicly",,,I know for a fact that BMS excluded previous Yervoy use until the very end of the last trial and then added a single arm for Yervoy use previously…the article used old stats and only a small group of people..ASCO 2013 countdown …we will have so much more info in just a few weeks! I am a BMS baby and I have been Stage 4 NED for over 3 years now…they need to put that in their stats!
-
- May 12, 2013 at 4:37 am
if you read it carefully he stated "publicly",,,I know for a fact that BMS excluded previous Yervoy use until the very end of the last trial and then added a single arm for Yervoy use previously…the article used old stats and only a small group of people..ASCO 2013 countdown …we will have so much more info in just a few weeks! I am a BMS baby and I have been Stage 4 NED for over 3 years now…they need to put that in their stats!
-
- May 12, 2013 at 4:37 am
if you read it carefully he stated "publicly",,,I know for a fact that BMS excluded previous Yervoy use until the very end of the last trial and then added a single arm for Yervoy use previously…the article used old stats and only a small group of people..ASCO 2013 countdown …we will have so much more info in just a few weeks! I am a BMS baby and I have been Stage 4 NED for over 3 years now…they need to put that in their stats!
-
- May 12, 2013 at 2:34 pm
I wrote my onc about this article regarding the "short duration" …I also sent him the link and quoted from the article. He is in Paris on vacation, but since I went a bit crazy I wrote him anyways! He writes….regarding the duration of anti pd-1 and the article in question…I have a reply….
Lynn:
Not sure of where the data come from, but that has not been my experience with the BMS drug, where the responses are of long duration.
Jeff W.-
- May 15, 2013 at 7:15 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:15 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:15 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:17 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:17 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:17 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:18 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:18 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:18 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:20 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:20 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:20 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:20 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:20 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available. -
- May 15, 2013 at 7:20 pm
Like Lynn, I am NED after treatment in the phase 2 trial of what was known as MDX-1106. I had a high tumor burden and responded rather quickly. I do not believe that there is enough data available to make any valid comparisons of either the durability of response or response rate in patients with prior Yervoy treatment. They have been excluded from earlier BMY trials. Like Lynn, I can’t wait until tomorrow when the ASCO Abstracts start to be made available.
-
- May 12, 2013 at 2:34 pm
I wrote my onc about this article regarding the "short duration" …I also sent him the link and quoted from the article. He is in Paris on vacation, but since I went a bit crazy I wrote him anyways! He writes….regarding the duration of anti pd-1 and the article in question…I have a reply….
Lynn:
Not sure of where the data come from, but that has not been my experience with the BMS drug, where the responses are of long duration.
Jeff W. -
- May 12, 2013 at 2:34 pm
I wrote my onc about this article regarding the "short duration" …I also sent him the link and quoted from the article. He is in Paris on vacation, but since I went a bit crazy I wrote him anyways! He writes….regarding the duration of anti pd-1 and the article in question…I have a reply….
Lynn:
Not sure of where the data come from, but that has not been my experience with the BMS drug, where the responses are of long duration.
Jeff W.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.