› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Pathology explanation
- This topic has 3 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 7 years, 4 months ago by KMick.
- Post
- Replies
-
-
- December 6, 2016 at 3:05 am
It is my understanding that dermal would translate to dermis, the "second layer" of skin: epidermis then dermis is below it. I would think that this would mean that the lesion didn't make it to or didn't involve the dermis which would be a good thing. I'm not an expert but that is my take on it.
-
- December 6, 2016 at 3:05 am
It is my understanding that dermal would translate to dermis, the "second layer" of skin: epidermis then dermis is below it. I would think that this would mean that the lesion didn't make it to or didn't involve the dermis which would be a good thing. I'm not an expert but that is my take on it.
-
- December 6, 2016 at 3:05 am
It is my understanding that dermal would translate to dermis, the "second layer" of skin: epidermis then dermis is below it. I would think that this would mean that the lesion didn't make it to or didn't involve the dermis which would be a good thing. I'm not an expert but that is my take on it.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.