› Forums › General Melanoma Community › NRAS mutations predict immunotherapy outcomes in melanoma patients
- This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 8 months ago by
Bubbles.
- Post
-
- March 11, 2015 at 1:49 pm
Vitals
Key clinical point: Patients with advanced melanoma and mutations in the NRAS gene had better responses to immunotherapy than did those without NRAS mutations.
Major finding: Of the patients with mutated NRAS, 28% had complete or partial responses to first-line immunotherapy, compared with 16% of patients without NRAS mutations.
Data source: The retrospective study evaluated medical records from 229 patients with advanced melanoma who were treated with ipilimumab, IL-2, or anti-PD-1/PD-L1.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Patients with advanced melanoma who were treated with immunotherapy responded better if they harbored mutations in the NRAS gene, according to a study published March 3 in Cancer Immunology Research.
Out of 229 cases retrospectively analyzed, 26% had mutations in NRASG12/G13/Q61, 23% had BRAFV600, and 51% were wild type for NRAS and BRAF. Patients received first-line therapy with high-dose IL-2 (25%), ipilimumab (62%), or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (12%), investigators reported (Cancer Immunol. Res. 2015 March 3).
- Replies
-
-
- March 11, 2015 at 1:53 pm
Up until 2 years ago, everything I reaad said NRAS was the mutation that the least was known about treating. Then late 2013 NIH published a study that gave a 47% positive response rate for NRS patiants that had received IL-2. Looks like that was just a start. COME ON BIO-MARKERS!
-
- March 11, 2015 at 1:53 pm
Up until 2 years ago, everything I reaad said NRAS was the mutation that the least was known about treating. Then late 2013 NIH published a study that gave a 47% positive response rate for NRS patiants that had received IL-2. Looks like that was just a start. COME ON BIO-MARKERS!
-
- March 11, 2015 at 1:53 pm
Up until 2 years ago, everything I reaad said NRAS was the mutation that the least was known about treating. Then late 2013 NIH published a study that gave a 47% positive response rate for NRS patiants that had received IL-2. Looks like that was just a start. COME ON BIO-MARKERS!
-
- March 11, 2015 at 3:54 pm
You're right, Jerry! Finally, some well deserved good news for NRAS folks. Here is a post I made when some of this data was presented in April:
Best wishes to you all! C
-
- March 11, 2015 at 3:54 pm
You're right, Jerry! Finally, some well deserved good news for NRAS folks. Here is a post I made when some of this data was presented in April:
Best wishes to you all! C
-
- March 11, 2015 at 3:54 pm
You're right, Jerry! Finally, some well deserved good news for NRAS folks. Here is a post I made when some of this data was presented in April:
Best wishes to you all! C
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.