› Forums › General Melanoma Community › New to Board – Stage IIIa Treatment Questions and Quality of Life?
- This topic has 18 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 3 months ago by Lucassi.
- Post
-
- January 12, 2012 at 1:33 pm
Hello,
I'm newly-diagnosed and new to this site, and would like to ask a few questions of the group! I was diagnosed with acral melanoma stage IIb on my right foot in November. Since then, have had two surgeries – one for the initial excision, and one for the margins that resulted in the amputation of my 4th and 5th toes and part of foot below them. They did a sentinel lobe biopsy at the same time, and one lobe came back positive at the microscopic level – the doc said there were very few cells there, but this bumps up the stage to a IIIa….
Hello,
I'm newly-diagnosed and new to this site, and would like to ask a few questions of the group! I was diagnosed with acral melanoma stage IIb on my right foot in November. Since then, have had two surgeries – one for the initial excision, and one for the margins that resulted in the amputation of my 4th and 5th toes and part of foot below them. They did a sentinel lobe biopsy at the same time, and one lobe came back positive at the microscopic level – the doc said there were very few cells there, but this bumps up the stage to a IIIa….
So now the plan is to remove the linguinal lymph nodes, and I can follow up with Interferon either the high-level one or the 5-year plan.. My medical doc said he would like me to consider the 5-year treatment, as the latest info shows that my particular type of melanoma had promising results of remission with the 5-year pegylated interferon (Sylatron) treatment.
I'm still trying to decide what to do, and Im confused. All the info out there says Interferon does NOT impact survival rates, but DOES have an impact on remission rates. So what does that mean??? I would assume if it can delay remission, it would improve survival. But mainly, I'm trying to decide if having the reduction in quality of life is really worth it….survival rates after five years for my type/stage of cancer are not in my favor, lol! So do I want to live my life to the fullest for a shorter time, or feel like crap every day for the next five years and then possible die anyhow? UGH! What a choice!
I am a healthy 49-years-young woman who has no other medical issues and leads an active lifestyle. My daughter and her husband live with me, and I have two wonderful grandchildren and another on the way…I have a lot to live for and have a high pain threshold, so I'm up for the battle. However, I just want to be able to actually enjoy my possibly-limited time with them, and I'm worried that the Interferon treatment would not let me do that.
I would love to get comments from the folks on the board about how they made their treatment decisions! I am very torn at this point! Thanks so much!
Lynn
- Replies
-
-
- January 12, 2012 at 7:42 pm
Lynn:
As you probably know, acral melanoma is rare and has a different genetic profile from other types of melanoma. I suspect that is why no-one has weighed in in interferon yet!
The decision about interferon is highly personal, and you will find people on this board who feel strongly that it is the best thing to do while others feel just the opposite.
Progression free survival is the amount of time between when a therapy begins and when tumors either grow or return. In a large group of patients, divided into those who did and did not take interferon, the ones on interferon stayed "progression free" for a somewhat longer period of time–I believe about 3 to 5% longer. However, if you look at how many people in these studies ultimately succumbed to melanoman, the numbers are about the same whether or not you took interferon.
The problem with these studies is that they only say what has happened to a large group of people. They say nothing about what will happen to you.
Do you know if you have the c-kit (see-kit) mutation? It is very rare in cutaneous melanoma, but is fairly common in acral melanoma. If you do have the mutation you may be eligible for some therepies that attack that mutation.
Tim–MRF
-
- January 12, 2012 at 7:42 pm
Lynn:
As you probably know, acral melanoma is rare and has a different genetic profile from other types of melanoma. I suspect that is why no-one has weighed in in interferon yet!
The decision about interferon is highly personal, and you will find people on this board who feel strongly that it is the best thing to do while others feel just the opposite.
Progression free survival is the amount of time between when a therapy begins and when tumors either grow or return. In a large group of patients, divided into those who did and did not take interferon, the ones on interferon stayed "progression free" for a somewhat longer period of time–I believe about 3 to 5% longer. However, if you look at how many people in these studies ultimately succumbed to melanoman, the numbers are about the same whether or not you took interferon.
The problem with these studies is that they only say what has happened to a large group of people. They say nothing about what will happen to you.
Do you know if you have the c-kit (see-kit) mutation? It is very rare in cutaneous melanoma, but is fairly common in acral melanoma. If you do have the mutation you may be eligible for some therepies that attack that mutation.
Tim–MRF
-
- January 12, 2012 at 9:00 pm
Hi Tim,
Thanks for your response! Still awaiting genetic testing results; the doc said they take 6-10 weeks. So I don't know yet.
Johns Hopkins is doing a clinical study on whether or not removing the lymph nodes is beneficial for this type of melanoma, but it's already Phase 2 of the study. I researched other trials, but most are vaccine studies geared to treating metatastic melanoma…I would also need to know my genetic results to participate. Hopefully, will be seeing those soon; the lesion was excised on Nov. 30.
Meawhile, I'll keep gimping along on crutches from the partial foot amputation, and entertaining the grandkids who are fascinated with my gnarly foot and can't wait to see it every other day when I change the bandages! I even managed to completely gross out my great-nephews with a photo of the foot post-surgery! Kids seem to find it both "cool" and "gross" at the same time…I agree about the gross part!
I'm scheduled for the lymph node removal on Jan. 27. Keeping my fingers crossed that I'll have minimal lymphodema and will heal quickly!
Will check back in when I have genetic testing results.
Lynn
-
- January 12, 2012 at 9:00 pm
Hi Tim,
Thanks for your response! Still awaiting genetic testing results; the doc said they take 6-10 weeks. So I don't know yet.
Johns Hopkins is doing a clinical study on whether or not removing the lymph nodes is beneficial for this type of melanoma, but it's already Phase 2 of the study. I researched other trials, but most are vaccine studies geared to treating metatastic melanoma…I would also need to know my genetic results to participate. Hopefully, will be seeing those soon; the lesion was excised on Nov. 30.
Meawhile, I'll keep gimping along on crutches from the partial foot amputation, and entertaining the grandkids who are fascinated with my gnarly foot and can't wait to see it every other day when I change the bandages! I even managed to completely gross out my great-nephews with a photo of the foot post-surgery! Kids seem to find it both "cool" and "gross" at the same time…I agree about the gross part!
I'm scheduled for the lymph node removal on Jan. 27. Keeping my fingers crossed that I'll have minimal lymphodema and will heal quickly!
Will check back in when I have genetic testing results.
Lynn
-
- January 12, 2012 at 9:00 pm
Hi Tim,
Thanks for your response! Still awaiting genetic testing results; the doc said they take 6-10 weeks. So I don't know yet.
Johns Hopkins is doing a clinical study on whether or not removing the lymph nodes is beneficial for this type of melanoma, but it's already Phase 2 of the study. I researched other trials, but most are vaccine studies geared to treating metatastic melanoma…I would also need to know my genetic results to participate. Hopefully, will be seeing those soon; the lesion was excised on Nov. 30.
Meawhile, I'll keep gimping along on crutches from the partial foot amputation, and entertaining the grandkids who are fascinated with my gnarly foot and can't wait to see it every other day when I change the bandages! I even managed to completely gross out my great-nephews with a photo of the foot post-surgery! Kids seem to find it both "cool" and "gross" at the same time…I agree about the gross part!
I'm scheduled for the lymph node removal on Jan. 27. Keeping my fingers crossed that I'll have minimal lymphodema and will heal quickly!
Will check back in when I have genetic testing results.
Lynn
-
- January 12, 2012 at 7:42 pm
Lynn:
As you probably know, acral melanoma is rare and has a different genetic profile from other types of melanoma. I suspect that is why no-one has weighed in in interferon yet!
The decision about interferon is highly personal, and you will find people on this board who feel strongly that it is the best thing to do while others feel just the opposite.
Progression free survival is the amount of time between when a therapy begins and when tumors either grow or return. In a large group of patients, divided into those who did and did not take interferon, the ones on interferon stayed "progression free" for a somewhat longer period of time–I believe about 3 to 5% longer. However, if you look at how many people in these studies ultimately succumbed to melanoman, the numbers are about the same whether or not you took interferon.
The problem with these studies is that they only say what has happened to a large group of people. They say nothing about what will happen to you.
Do you know if you have the c-kit (see-kit) mutation? It is very rare in cutaneous melanoma, but is fairly common in acral melanoma. If you do have the mutation you may be eligible for some therepies that attack that mutation.
Tim–MRF
-
- January 12, 2012 at 7:48 pm
Lynn,
Sorry to hear of your diagnosis, but welcome to the site where you can get lots of good information and support from others who've been there.
The choice of whether to do interferon or not and if so, what type, is very personal and you will hear some very diverse views on it. Just to give you my experience with it so far: I chose to do a 6 month trial of pegylated interferon back in September and am 6 weeks away from finishing it. My side-effects have not been too bad overall, mainly fatigue and some headaches. I am now just starting to have some thyroid issues, but I have been able to work and travel (I travel quite a bit for work) througout.
My thought to you would be that you can always stop the treatment if the effects on you are too bad. Interferon affects everyone differently and since you are still young and healthy, you may not experience very many bad side-effects. And if it starts affecting your lifestyle too badly, just stop. You may also want to see if there are any alternatives to the 5-year peg plan, as there may be possibilities to do it for less time.
But in any case, it's you who need to be comfortable with the decision. I wish you the best in making the one that will work for you and hope all goes well for you.
Elisa
-
- January 12, 2012 at 7:48 pm
Lynn,
Sorry to hear of your diagnosis, but welcome to the site where you can get lots of good information and support from others who've been there.
The choice of whether to do interferon or not and if so, what type, is very personal and you will hear some very diverse views on it. Just to give you my experience with it so far: I chose to do a 6 month trial of pegylated interferon back in September and am 6 weeks away from finishing it. My side-effects have not been too bad overall, mainly fatigue and some headaches. I am now just starting to have some thyroid issues, but I have been able to work and travel (I travel quite a bit for work) througout.
My thought to you would be that you can always stop the treatment if the effects on you are too bad. Interferon affects everyone differently and since you are still young and healthy, you may not experience very many bad side-effects. And if it starts affecting your lifestyle too badly, just stop. You may also want to see if there are any alternatives to the 5-year peg plan, as there may be possibilities to do it for less time.
But in any case, it's you who need to be comfortable with the decision. I wish you the best in making the one that will work for you and hope all goes well for you.
Elisa
-
- January 12, 2012 at 7:48 pm
Lynn,
Sorry to hear of your diagnosis, but welcome to the site where you can get lots of good information and support from others who've been there.
The choice of whether to do interferon or not and if so, what type, is very personal and you will hear some very diverse views on it. Just to give you my experience with it so far: I chose to do a 6 month trial of pegylated interferon back in September and am 6 weeks away from finishing it. My side-effects have not been too bad overall, mainly fatigue and some headaches. I am now just starting to have some thyroid issues, but I have been able to work and travel (I travel quite a bit for work) througout.
My thought to you would be that you can always stop the treatment if the effects on you are too bad. Interferon affects everyone differently and since you are still young and healthy, you may not experience very many bad side-effects. And if it starts affecting your lifestyle too badly, just stop. You may also want to see if there are any alternatives to the 5-year peg plan, as there may be possibilities to do it for less time.
But in any case, it's you who need to be comfortable with the decision. I wish you the best in making the one that will work for you and hope all goes well for you.
Elisa
-
- January 12, 2012 at 10:05 pm
Hi Lynn,
My husband (now 69 yrs old) was diagnosed in March 2010 with acral lentiginous melanoma. His melanoma was under the great toe. The tumor was large, over 11 mm; his toe was amputated and he had a sentinal lymph node biopsy. Luckily, there was no evidence of cancer in the lymph node. Also, Pet and CT scans did not shown any evidence of spread. My husband's tumor was negative for CKit and the Braf mutation, so his only option of treatment was Interferon. His melanoma specialist, Dr. Rene Gonzales, recommended Interferon for one month only. According to Dr. Gonzales and the other melanoma specialists at the University of Denver, there is no statistical advantage of doing Interferon for one year vs. the high dose for one month. My husband tolerated the treatment as expected. Every day after the treatment he had a fever and and was very tired, but during the weekends he usually recovered fairly well. He has had CT scans every six months and so far there is no evidence of disease. His next scan is scheduled for May 2012.
I know it is a difficult decision to make as far as the Interferon treatment. However, in my husband's case there was nothing else available, and he felt better doing something instead of watch and wait. Since his tumor was over 11 mm deep, he is a stage 2C.
Heidi
-
- January 12, 2012 at 10:05 pm
Hi Lynn,
My husband (now 69 yrs old) was diagnosed in March 2010 with acral lentiginous melanoma. His melanoma was under the great toe. The tumor was large, over 11 mm; his toe was amputated and he had a sentinal lymph node biopsy. Luckily, there was no evidence of cancer in the lymph node. Also, Pet and CT scans did not shown any evidence of spread. My husband's tumor was negative for CKit and the Braf mutation, so his only option of treatment was Interferon. His melanoma specialist, Dr. Rene Gonzales, recommended Interferon for one month only. According to Dr. Gonzales and the other melanoma specialists at the University of Denver, there is no statistical advantage of doing Interferon for one year vs. the high dose for one month. My husband tolerated the treatment as expected. Every day after the treatment he had a fever and and was very tired, but during the weekends he usually recovered fairly well. He has had CT scans every six months and so far there is no evidence of disease. His next scan is scheduled for May 2012.
I know it is a difficult decision to make as far as the Interferon treatment. However, in my husband's case there was nothing else available, and he felt better doing something instead of watch and wait. Since his tumor was over 11 mm deep, he is a stage 2C.
Heidi
-
- January 12, 2012 at 10:05 pm
Hi Lynn,
My husband (now 69 yrs old) was diagnosed in March 2010 with acral lentiginous melanoma. His melanoma was under the great toe. The tumor was large, over 11 mm; his toe was amputated and he had a sentinal lymph node biopsy. Luckily, there was no evidence of cancer in the lymph node. Also, Pet and CT scans did not shown any evidence of spread. My husband's tumor was negative for CKit and the Braf mutation, so his only option of treatment was Interferon. His melanoma specialist, Dr. Rene Gonzales, recommended Interferon for one month only. According to Dr. Gonzales and the other melanoma specialists at the University of Denver, there is no statistical advantage of doing Interferon for one year vs. the high dose for one month. My husband tolerated the treatment as expected. Every day after the treatment he had a fever and and was very tired, but during the weekends he usually recovered fairly well. He has had CT scans every six months and so far there is no evidence of disease. His next scan is scheduled for May 2012.
I know it is a difficult decision to make as far as the Interferon treatment. However, in my husband's case there was nothing else available, and he felt better doing something instead of watch and wait. Since his tumor was over 11 mm deep, he is a stage 2C.
Heidi
-
- January 12, 2012 at 10:06 pm
Hi Lynn,
My husband (now 69 yrs old) was diagnosed in March 2010 with acral lentiginous melanoma. His melanoma was under the great toe. The tumor was large, over 11 mm; his toe was amputated and he had a sentinal lymph node biopsy. Luckily, there was no evidence of cancer in the lymph node. Also, Pet and CT scans did not shown any evidence of spread. My husband's tumor was negative for CKit and the Braf mutation, so his only option of treatment was Interferon. His melanoma specialist, Dr. Rene Gonzales, recommended Interferon for one month only. According to Dr. Gonzales and the other melanoma specialists at the University of Denver, there is no statistical advantage of doing Interferon for one year vs. the high dose for one month. My husband tolerated the treatment as expected. Every day after the treatment he had a fever and and was very tired, but during the weekends he usually recovered fairly well. He has had CT scans every six months and so far there is no evidence of disease. His next scan is scheduled for May 2012.
I know it is a difficult decision to make as far as the Interferon treatment. However, in my husband's case there was nothing else available, and he felt better doing something instead of watch and wait. Since his tumor was over 11 mm deep, he is a stage 2C.
Heidi
-
- January 12, 2012 at 10:06 pm
Hi Lynn,
My husband (now 69 yrs old) was diagnosed in March 2010 with acral lentiginous melanoma. His melanoma was under the great toe. The tumor was large, over 11 mm; his toe was amputated and he had a sentinal lymph node biopsy. Luckily, there was no evidence of cancer in the lymph node. Also, Pet and CT scans did not shown any evidence of spread. My husband's tumor was negative for CKit and the Braf mutation, so his only option of treatment was Interferon. His melanoma specialist, Dr. Rene Gonzales, recommended Interferon for one month only. According to Dr. Gonzales and the other melanoma specialists at the University of Denver, there is no statistical advantage of doing Interferon for one year vs. the high dose for one month. My husband tolerated the treatment as expected. Every day after the treatment he had a fever and and was very tired, but during the weekends he usually recovered fairly well. He has had CT scans every six months and so far there is no evidence of disease. His next scan is scheduled for May 2012.
I know it is a difficult decision to make as far as the Interferon treatment. However, in my husband's case there was nothing else available, and he felt better doing something instead of watch and wait. Since his tumor was over 11 mm deep, he is a stage 2C.
Heidi
-
- January 12, 2012 at 10:06 pm
Hi Lynn,
My husband (now 69 yrs old) was diagnosed in March 2010 with acral lentiginous melanoma. His melanoma was under the great toe. The tumor was large, over 11 mm; his toe was amputated and he had a sentinal lymph node biopsy. Luckily, there was no evidence of cancer in the lymph node. Also, Pet and CT scans did not shown any evidence of spread. My husband's tumor was negative for CKit and the Braf mutation, so his only option of treatment was Interferon. His melanoma specialist, Dr. Rene Gonzales, recommended Interferon for one month only. According to Dr. Gonzales and the other melanoma specialists at the University of Denver, there is no statistical advantage of doing Interferon for one year vs. the high dose for one month. My husband tolerated the treatment as expected. Every day after the treatment he had a fever and and was very tired, but during the weekends he usually recovered fairly well. He has had CT scans every six months and so far there is no evidence of disease. His next scan is scheduled for May 2012.
I know it is a difficult decision to make as far as the Interferon treatment. However, in my husband's case there was nothing else available, and he felt better doing something instead of watch and wait. Since his tumor was over 11 mm deep, he is a stage 2C.
Heidi
-
- January 12, 2012 at 10:06 pm
Hi Lynn,
My husband (now 69 yrs old) was diagnosed in March 2010 with acral lentiginous melanoma. His melanoma was under the great toe. The tumor was large, over 11 mm; his toe was amputated and he had a sentinal lymph node biopsy. Luckily, there was no evidence of cancer in the lymph node. Also, Pet and CT scans did not shown any evidence of spread. My husband's tumor was negative for CKit and the Braf mutation, so his only option of treatment was Interferon. His melanoma specialist, Dr. Rene Gonzales, recommended Interferon for one month only. According to Dr. Gonzales and the other melanoma specialists at the University of Denver, there is no statistical advantage of doing Interferon for one year vs. the high dose for one month. My husband tolerated the treatment as expected. Every day after the treatment he had a fever and and was very tired, but during the weekends he usually recovered fairly well. He has had CT scans every six months and so far there is no evidence of disease. His next scan is scheduled for May 2012.
I know it is a difficult decision to make as far as the Interferon treatment. However, in my husband's case there was nothing else available, and he felt better doing something instead of watch and wait. Since his tumor was over 11 mm deep, he is a stage 2C.
Heidi
-
- January 12, 2012 at 10:06 pm
Hi Lynn,
My husband (now 69 yrs old) was diagnosed in March 2010 with acral lentiginous melanoma. His melanoma was under the great toe. The tumor was large, over 11 mm; his toe was amputated and he had a sentinal lymph node biopsy. Luckily, there was no evidence of cancer in the lymph node. Also, Pet and CT scans did not shown any evidence of spread. My husband's tumor was negative for CKit and the Braf mutation, so his only option of treatment was Interferon. His melanoma specialist, Dr. Rene Gonzales, recommended Interferon for one month only. According to Dr. Gonzales and the other melanoma specialists at the University of Denver, there is no statistical advantage of doing Interferon for one year vs. the high dose for one month. My husband tolerated the treatment as expected. Every day after the treatment he had a fever and and was very tired, but during the weekends he usually recovered fairly well. He has had CT scans every six months and so far there is no evidence of disease. His next scan is scheduled for May 2012.
I know it is a difficult decision to make as far as the Interferon treatment. However, in my husband's case there was nothing else available, and he felt better doing something instead of watch and wait. Since his tumor was over 11 mm deep, he is a stage 2C.
Heidi
-
- January 12, 2012 at 10:06 pm
Hi Lynn,
My husband (now 69 yrs old) was diagnosed in March 2010 with acral lentiginous melanoma. His melanoma was under the great toe. The tumor was large, over 11 mm; his toe was amputated and he had a sentinal lymph node biopsy. Luckily, there was no evidence of cancer in the lymph node. Also, Pet and CT scans did not shown any evidence of spread. My husband's tumor was negative for CKit and the Braf mutation, so his only option of treatment was Interferon. His melanoma specialist, Dr. Rene Gonzales, recommended Interferon for one month only. According to Dr. Gonzales and the other melanoma specialists at the University of Denver, there is no statistical advantage of doing Interferon for one year vs. the high dose for one month. My husband tolerated the treatment as expected. Every day after the treatment he had a fever and and was very tired, but during the weekends he usually recovered fairly well. He has had CT scans every six months and so far there is no evidence of disease. His next scan is scheduled for May 2012.
I know it is a difficult decision to make as far as the Interferon treatment. However, in my husband's case there was nothing else available, and he felt better doing something instead of watch and wait. Since his tumor was over 11 mm deep, he is a stage 2C.
Heidi
-
Tagged: acral, cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.