The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

New to Board and Melanoma

Forums General Melanoma Community New to Board and Melanoma

  • Post
    NicoleinVA
    Participant

      Hello,

       

      Let me start by saying how thrilled I am to find this community and all your insight.  As is says above, I am new to melanoma and very scared.  I am a 44 year old female with very few moles, however I did my share (and more) of sunbathing in my youth as well tanning beds for a 'heathly glow'..what was I thinking.  I recently me with a surgical oncologist after 3 months, with 3 very different patholgy reports.   I had a I  I ha

      Hello,

       

      Let me start by saying how thrilled I am to find this community and all your insight.  As is says above, I am new to melanoma and very scared.  I am a 44 year old female with very few moles, however I did my share (and more) of sunbathing in my youth as well tanning beds for a 'heathly glow'..what was I thinking.  I recently me with a surgical oncologist after 3 months, with 3 very different patholgy reports.   I had a I  I ha

      d I had a punch biopsey of a re-occuring mole (was removed in 2005 and classified as atypical) in April 2011 and was sent to plastic sugeon for a 2mm excision in May 2011, who sent his biopsey out to pathology.

      This is where the nightmare started as there has been such a disparity in pathology reports (3 reports with everything from atypical nevi (Univ of VA), malignant melanoma in situ (Dominion) to malignant melanoma w/signs of early lymphatic involvement (Bon Seours)).   I cannot believe that the pathologists are looking at the same slide and can’t agree to the same diagnosis.  Is this common?  The site as .8 mm, with clear margins, no ulceration and now classified as stage 1a pending next surgery.  I've decided, with advice from surgical oncologist, it would be prudent for me to follow an aggressive approach because of all the unknowns.

      I will be having a wide excision done by the surgical oncologist; a plastic surgeon will do skin graph on my leg (calf area) and then a sentinel lymph node biopsy will performed by a radiologist during surgery as well.  They have scheduled a PET scan, as well as blood work/chest x-ray.  Surgery is not set date yet as I have to get on both doctors schedules. I am trying to optimistic that this has not spread or is early, but it is still an emotional rollercoaster.  The recovery due to skin graph is scarring me too.

      Any and all comments, experiences and suggestions would be greatly appreciated. 

      Many thanks,

      Nicole

    Viewing 9 reply threads
    • Replies
        StevenK
        Participant

          Hang in there, Nicole! I'm quite familair with the fear that you are going through, but take some deep breaths and try not to obsess on worst case scenarios. Although there's a lot of confusion, it's very encouraging that they've given you an intial stage of 1a. The sentinel node biopsy will tell you if it has spread. If the depth of your lesion was .8mm with no ulceration, the odds are heavily in your favor. 

          Best regards, Steve

            NicoleinVA
            Participant

              Thanks for replying Steve!

              NicoleinVA
              Participant

                Thanks for replying Steve!

                NicoleinVA
                Participant

                  Thanks for replying Steve!

                  NicoleinVA
                  Participant

                    Thanks for replying Steve!

                  StevenK
                  Participant

                    Hang in there, Nicole! I'm quite familair with the fear that you are going through, but take some deep breaths and try not to obsess on worst case scenarios. Although there's a lot of confusion, it's very encouraging that they've given you an intial stage of 1a. The sentinel node biopsy will tell you if it has spread. If the depth of your lesion was .8mm with no ulceration, the odds are heavily in your favor. 

                    Best regards, Steve

                    lhaley
                    Participant

                      Nicole,

                      I'm sorry you've had to join us.  There is often some disparity but I don't understand how they can say possible lymphatic involvement from a biopsy of a mole! I'm hoping it was an overzealous pathologist. 

                      Sounds like your oncologist is aggressive with the SNB and the PET.  I hope you get a clear bill of health and can go back to living. Just now that you know what can happen learn to be sunwise and stay out of the tanning beds! 

                      You can't look backwards and beat yourself up. 

                      Linda

                      Stage IV since 06  NED 6 weeks

                        NicoleinVA
                        Participant

                          I agree about the one path report being overzealous too…

                          I'm worried about recovery/side effects from the SLNB and wonder if I should even be having that if the PET scan is clear?  On the other hand, I worry about not being aggressive when it comes to melanoma.

                          NicoleinVA
                          Participant

                            I agree about the one path report being overzealous too…

                            I'm worried about recovery/side effects from the SLNB and wonder if I should even be having that if the PET scan is clear?  On the other hand, I worry about not being aggressive when it comes to melanoma.

                            NicoleinVA
                            Participant

                              I agree about the one path report being overzealous too…

                              I'm worried about recovery/side effects from the SLNB and wonder if I should even be having that if the PET scan is clear?  On the other hand, I worry about not being aggressive when it comes to melanoma.

                              NicoleinVA
                              Participant

                                I agree about the one path report being overzealous too…

                                I'm worried about recovery/side effects from the SLNB and wonder if I should even be having that if the PET scan is clear?  On the other hand, I worry about not being aggressive when it comes to melanoma.

                              lhaley
                              Participant

                                Nicole,

                                I'm sorry you've had to join us.  There is often some disparity but I don't understand how they can say possible lymphatic involvement from a biopsy of a mole! I'm hoping it was an overzealous pathologist. 

                                Sounds like your oncologist is aggressive with the SNB and the PET.  I hope you get a clear bill of health and can go back to living. Just now that you know what can happen learn to be sunwise and stay out of the tanning beds! 

                                You can't look backwards and beat yourself up. 

                                Linda

                                Stage IV since 06  NED 6 weeks

                                Dynasysman
                                Participant
                                  Hi Nicole —

                                  Welcome and here’s hoping you will not need advice too often…

                                  The one benefit of an SNLB over the PET is that a PET is not sensitive to growths under 5mm. If there is early node involvement in the SNL alone, the PET scan may miss it.

                                  Good luck!

                                  Dynasysman
                                  Participant
                                    Hi Nicole —

                                    Welcome and here’s hoping you will not need advice too often…

                                    The one benefit of an SNLB over the PET is that a PET is not sensitive to growths under 5mm. If there is early node involvement in the SNL alone, the PET scan may miss it.

                                    Good luck!

                                    Carol Taylor
                                    Participant

                                      Hi Nicole and welcome,

                                      Are any of your doctors melanoma specialists? I don't see that mentioned. If I were you, if they are not, I would get my records and get referred to one before making further plans for anything, especially given all the confusion you're facing.

                                      While the course of action is sound, it will be far better for you if you're in the hands of a specialist.

                                      Lord, in Your mercy, open doors for Nicole to get the answers and treatment she needs to beat the beast in her life. Thank You. Amen and Amen.

                                      Grace and peace,

                                      Carol

                                      Carol Taylor
                                      Participant

                                        Hi Nicole and welcome,

                                        Are any of your doctors melanoma specialists? I don't see that mentioned. If I were you, if they are not, I would get my records and get referred to one before making further plans for anything, especially given all the confusion you're facing.

                                        While the course of action is sound, it will be far better for you if you're in the hands of a specialist.

                                        Lord, in Your mercy, open doors for Nicole to get the answers and treatment she needs to beat the beast in her life. Thank You. Amen and Amen.

                                        Grace and peace,

                                        Carol

                                        CLPrice31
                                        Participant

                                          Hi Nicole,

                                          I'm also a fellow Virginia girl! So sorry you had to join us… I have a few opinions, but I know more people will be able to give you better advice.

                                          1) Definitely be in support of the SNB. Yes, the recovery will not be a fantastic experience; however, because the amount of melanoma in my lymph nodes was so small, a PET Scan would have never shown it. (I'm 24, initially diganosed in January, stage III A.) I had a 90% chance of it not being in my lymph nodes, but sure enough, it was…in 3 separate areas. Not trying to scare you, but I am trying to explain to you how important it is to be aggressive. No one wants to have surgery, but I am a firm believer that if there is cancer in us, we should get it out.

                                          2) I am not sure where in VA you are, but try to find a melanoma specialist. UVA has a pretty great program, but they are still behind in some of their trial options.  Do your research. If you have not Knowledge is power! 🙂 (At the same time, know when to step away from the computer. It can be very overwhelming.)

                                          and 3) The people you meet on this forum (and others) are blessings. Talk to them, ask the questions you need to ask. There is a lot of comfort to be found here.

                                          Best wishes to you!

                                            NicoleinVA
                                            Participant

                                              Thanks for all the responses…it's brought me alot of clarity.  I thought PET scans showed everything, so yes I will be in favor of the SNB.

                                              I hear so many stories about bad reactions after skin graphs and SLNB, but obvioulsy living with melanoma and not knowing it outweight those complications.

                                              Again, thanks for responses, it really brings me alot of comfort.

                                              NicoleinVA
                                              Participant

                                                Thanks for all the responses…it's brought me alot of clarity.  I thought PET scans showed everything, so yes I will be in favor of the SNB.

                                                I hear so many stories about bad reactions after skin graphs and SLNB, but obvioulsy living with melanoma and not knowing it outweight those complications.

                                                Again, thanks for responses, it really brings me alot of comfort.

                                              CLPrice31
                                              Participant

                                                Hi Nicole,

                                                I'm also a fellow Virginia girl! So sorry you had to join us… I have a few opinions, but I know more people will be able to give you better advice.

                                                1) Definitely be in support of the SNB. Yes, the recovery will not be a fantastic experience; however, because the amount of melanoma in my lymph nodes was so small, a PET Scan would have never shown it. (I'm 24, initially diganosed in January, stage III A.) I had a 90% chance of it not being in my lymph nodes, but sure enough, it was…in 3 separate areas. Not trying to scare you, but I am trying to explain to you how important it is to be aggressive. No one wants to have surgery, but I am a firm believer that if there is cancer in us, we should get it out.

                                                2) I am not sure where in VA you are, but try to find a melanoma specialist. UVA has a pretty great program, but they are still behind in some of their trial options.  Do your research. If you have not Knowledge is power! 🙂 (At the same time, know when to step away from the computer. It can be very overwhelming.)

                                                and 3) The people you meet on this forum (and others) are blessings. Talk to them, ask the questions you need to ask. There is a lot of comfort to be found here.

                                                Best wishes to you!

                                            Viewing 9 reply threads
                                            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                                            About the MRF Patient Forum

                                            The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                                            The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                                            Popular Topics