› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Mitotic index
- This topic has 9 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 3 months ago by Janner.
- Post
- Replies
-
-
- January 13, 2015 at 9:23 pm
Is this on a biopsy? It's certainly not the highest I've seen, but I'd probably say it is significant. You want to see <1 and having even 1 mitosis ups you a stage.
-
- January 13, 2015 at 9:33 pm
It was on a biopsy on my leg. I have been stage 3 since 11/2012. I just got a new oncologist and we were discussing it the other day and he told me he was concerned at that number. My last oncologist never seemed to concerned. I guess the more I read this forum, the more I realize I don't know as much about this monster as I need to. Thanks
-
- January 14, 2015 at 3:56 am
It's only the last couple of years that mitosis has been really given any attention. End of 2010, it was added to stage I staging. However, it is NOT included in any other staging at this point. Since you are already stage III, I'm not sure what significance a mitosis of 9 really has. You already know your at high risk. I'd definitely worry a bit more if I were stage I with that number.
-
- January 14, 2015 at 3:56 am
It's only the last couple of years that mitosis has been really given any attention. End of 2010, it was added to stage I staging. However, it is NOT included in any other staging at this point. Since you are already stage III, I'm not sure what significance a mitosis of 9 really has. You already know your at high risk. I'd definitely worry a bit more if I were stage I with that number.
-
- January 14, 2015 at 3:56 am
It's only the last couple of years that mitosis has been really given any attention. End of 2010, it was added to stage I staging. However, it is NOT included in any other staging at this point. Since you are already stage III, I'm not sure what significance a mitosis of 9 really has. You already know your at high risk. I'd definitely worry a bit more if I were stage I with that number.
-
- January 13, 2015 at 9:33 pm
It was on a biopsy on my leg. I have been stage 3 since 11/2012. I just got a new oncologist and we were discussing it the other day and he told me he was concerned at that number. My last oncologist never seemed to concerned. I guess the more I read this forum, the more I realize I don't know as much about this monster as I need to. Thanks
-
- January 13, 2015 at 9:33 pm
It was on a biopsy on my leg. I have been stage 3 since 11/2012. I just got a new oncologist and we were discussing it the other day and he told me he was concerned at that number. My last oncologist never seemed to concerned. I guess the more I read this forum, the more I realize I don't know as much about this monster as I need to. Thanks
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.