› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Impact on NIH due to Gov shutdown??
- This topic has 12 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 6 months ago by Cindy VT.
- Post
- Replies
-
-
- October 3, 2013 at 12:24 pm
Best I can find out is that it does not affect exisiting patients..or existing trials. But no new trials ans no new admittance into trials. Here is a quote from an article:
a memo from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that lays out a contingency staffing plan in the event "annual appropriations" are not enacted, states that while the NIH will not accept new patients or initiate new clinical protocols, "the continued provision of care to existing patients (both inpatients and outpatients) means the hospital would be operating at roughly 90% of normal patient load during the initial weeks of a funding hiatus."
Tina
-
- October 3, 2013 at 12:24 pm
Best I can find out is that it does not affect exisiting patients..or existing trials. But no new trials ans no new admittance into trials. Here is a quote from an article:
a memo from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that lays out a contingency staffing plan in the event "annual appropriations" are not enacted, states that while the NIH will not accept new patients or initiate new clinical protocols, "the continued provision of care to existing patients (both inpatients and outpatients) means the hospital would be operating at roughly 90% of normal patient load during the initial weeks of a funding hiatus."
Tina
-
- October 3, 2013 at 12:24 pm
Best I can find out is that it does not affect exisiting patients..or existing trials. But no new trials ans no new admittance into trials. Here is a quote from an article:
a memo from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that lays out a contingency staffing plan in the event "annual appropriations" are not enacted, states that while the NIH will not accept new patients or initiate new clinical protocols, "the continued provision of care to existing patients (both inpatients and outpatients) means the hospital would be operating at roughly 90% of normal patient load during the initial weeks of a funding hiatus."
Tina
-
- October 4, 2013 at 2:30 am
This is a great topic for the Off-topic Board. We used to have many discussions on things like this over there. Let's move this over and discuss (or CUSS?) away.
-
- October 4, 2013 at 2:30 am
This is a great topic for the Off-topic Board. We used to have many discussions on things like this over there. Let's move this over and discuss (or CUSS?) away.
-
- October 4, 2013 at 2:30 am
This is a great topic for the Off-topic Board. We used to have many discussions on things like this over there. Let's move this over and discuss (or CUSS?) away.
-
- October 6, 2013 at 12:35 am
I find this very distribing. I know everyone had their opinion. I try to have mine on facts. I write my senators and congressman. I know many may feel its no use, but I still think they hear our voices.
I wish everyone who had clinical trials and help from NIH that this will be a short shutdown.
Thoughts are with you!
Cindy VT
-
- October 6, 2013 at 12:35 am
I find this very distribing. I know everyone had their opinion. I try to have mine on facts. I write my senators and congressman. I know many may feel its no use, but I still think they hear our voices.
I wish everyone who had clinical trials and help from NIH that this will be a short shutdown.
Thoughts are with you!
Cindy VT
-
- October 6, 2013 at 12:35 am
I find this very distribing. I know everyone had their opinion. I try to have mine on facts. I write my senators and congressman. I know many may feel its no use, but I still think they hear our voices.
I wish everyone who had clinical trials and help from NIH that this will be a short shutdown.
Thoughts are with you!
Cindy VT
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.