Definition of “metastic” disease

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Definition of “metastic” disease

This topic has 2 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by Janner.

Post

- April 24, 2011 at 2:03 pm
- Quote
nicoli
Participant
Hello,

Such a simple question that I asked my oncologist and surgeon but I can't seem to get a clear answer…….

When a pathology report says "there is no sign of metastic disease", does this just mean there is no TUMOR or does this mean there are NO CANCER CELLS?

Hello,

Such a simple question that I asked my oncologist and surgeon but I can't seem to get a clear answer…….

When a pathology report says "there is no sign of metastic disease", does this just mean there is no TUMOR or does this mean there are NO CANCER CELLS?

I first questioned this when I had my neck dissection to remove 23 lymph nodes. One showed "signs of metastic disease" and listed no dimensions of a tumor. I asked my oncologist at the time what exactly that means and she said that she would have to call the lab to get the answer and she never got around to it. (which is one reason why she is my "first" oncologist!)

Thanks,

Nicki, Stage 3b, diagnosed December, 2009, scalp, surgeries (3), local recurrance October 2010, biochemo, currently radiating my scalp to (hopefully!) prevent recurrances.

Viewing 1 reply thread

Replies

- - April 24, 2011 at 3:11 pm
  - Quote
  Janner
  Participant
  If it is part of a pathology (biopsy) report, then it means in the samples they examined, there were no cancer cells found. Even one melanoma cell seen would be termed "metastatic disease". If this were part of a scan, then it would be more likely to mean there are no tumors. Scans can't analyze things at the cellular level, their resolution is such that a tumor needs to be several millimeters to show up.
  
  Best wishes,
  
  Janner.
- - April 24, 2011 at 3:11 pm
  - Quote
  Janner
  Participant
  If it is part of a pathology (biopsy) report, then it means in the samples they examined, there were no cancer cells found. Even one melanoma cell seen would be termed "metastatic disease". If this were part of a scan, then it would be more likely to mean there are no tumors. Scans can't analyze things at the cellular level, their resolution is such that a tumor needs to be several millimeters to show up.
  
  Best wishes,
  
  Janner.

Viewing 1 reply thread

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.