Article Summarizing Current Advanced Melanoma Treatments

Have no problem with your post.  I long ago learned to take with a grain  (OR shaker)  many of the articles, especially regarding the success rates of the new BIG cures (cherry picked " patients).  The targets are narrowed down (as they need to be), to get the best results.  Nothing is for across the board patients.  Keep posting new things you find.  (I don't have  time on my own to look up everything newly published.)

Have no problem with your post.  I long ago learned to take with a grain  (OR shaker)  many of the articles, especially regarding the success rates of the new BIG cures (cherry picked " patients).  The targets are narrowed down (as they need to be), to get the best results.  Nothing is for across the board patients.  Keep posting new things you find.  (I don't have  time on my own to look up everything newly published.)

Have no problem with your post.  I long ago learned to take with a grain  (OR shaker)  many of the articles, especially regarding the success rates of the new BIG cures (cherry picked " patients).  The targets are narrowed down (as they need to be), to get the best results.  Nothing is for across the board patients.  Keep posting new things you find.  (I don't have  time on my own to look up everything newly published.)

I would like to know what  items  in the publication Anonymous  disagrees with so drastically, or is it just the writer not being a melanoma research oncologist that is the dislike?

I would like to know what  items  in the publication Anonymous  disagrees with so drastically, or is it just the writer not being a melanoma research oncologist that is the dislike?

You are correct on some of the "anonymous" posts.  However, I do support having the capability because sometimes it allows one to post about items that are of general interest or particular interest that should not be referred back to an individual, regardless what name they are using here.  (Should they have to open a second Account under a different name?  Haven't tried that with this weeks new software. Couldn't do that with the  old software without also opening up a new Email site to have to register here.)  Outside of the people that want to say something and not have family read it as from them, or the ladies that have come in and been hesitant to talk about Vulvar or vaginal melanoma to a bunch of absolute strangers, I will always remember  the discussions that have gone on in the past about sex and melanoma patients and melanooma caregivers or the lack thereof.  I suspect from some of the posts and responses given, that some marriages have been saved.  This and the continuation of the bashful anonymous posts (After getting familiar with us, all ladies in this group that I am aware of have began using their registered name) makes the irritation I have suffered several  times at the hands of "anonymous" slanted and miss-informed posts more bare able.

You are correct on some of the "anonymous" posts.  However, I do support having the capability because sometimes it allows one to post about items that are of general interest or particular interest that should not be referred back to an individual, regardless what name they are using here.  (Should they have to open a second Account under a different name?  Haven't tried that with this weeks new software. Couldn't do that with the  old software without also opening up a new Email site to have to register here.)  Outside of the people that want to say something and not have family read it as from them, or the ladies that have come in and been hesitant to talk about Vulvar or vaginal melanoma to a bunch of absolute strangers, I will always remember  the discussions that have gone on in the past about sex and melanoma patients and melanooma caregivers or the lack thereof.  I suspect from some of the posts and responses given, that some marriages have been saved.  This and the continuation of the bashful anonymous posts (After getting familiar with us, all ladies in this group that I am aware of have began using their registered name) makes the irritation I have suffered several  times at the hands of "anonymous" slanted and miss-informed posts more bare able.

You are correct on some of the "anonymous" posts.  However, I do support having the capability because sometimes it allows one to post about items that are of general interest or particular interest that should not be referred back to an individual, regardless what name they are using here.  (Should they have to open a second Account under a different name?  Haven't tried that with this weeks new software. Couldn't do that with the  old software without also opening up a new Email site to have to register here.)  Outside of the people that want to say something and not have family read it as from them, or the ladies that have come in and been hesitant to talk about Vulvar or vaginal melanoma to a bunch of absolute strangers, I will always remember  the discussions that have gone on in the past about sex and melanoma patients and melanooma caregivers or the lack thereof.  I suspect from some of the posts and responses given, that some marriages have been saved.  This and the continuation of the bashful anonymous posts (After getting familiar with us, all ladies in this group that I am aware of have began using their registered name) makes the irritation I have suffered several  times at the hands of "anonymous" slanted and miss-informed posts more bare able.

I would like to know what  items  in the publication Anonymous  disagrees with so drastically, or is it just the writer not being a melanoma research oncologist that is the dislike?