› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Are there Stats on the most durable treatments for Stage 4?
- This topic has 9 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 4 months ago by stars.
- Post
-
- August 17, 2015 at 12:37 am
Hello all,
I am wondering if there are any stats on the most durable treatment for widespread stage 4 mel. I have read that there are people out there more than 5/10 years who are NED. Has there been any studies on these individuals and treatements that may be the most durable with prolonged NED? I know everyone is different with regards to age, disease and other things.
Just can't imaging not being here for my family and will do anything to get to NED! Hate this disease.
Love to you all, keep up the fight!!
- Replies
-
-
- August 17, 2015 at 3:08 am
Unfortunately know one can predict who will respond to what therapy. The old drug IL-2 had about a 4-5% rate of people being long-term responders. I know people who are 10+ years out and are still NED, after having multiple metastases in multiple organs.
The new immunotherapy drugs are showing similar signs, and perhaps with higher numbers. Yervoy (ipilimumab or "ipi") was the first drug in this category and I know people who are 10+ years out on that drug as well. The anti-PD1 drugs are too new to have those kinds of long-term survival numbers but many people anticipate that the numbers will be even larger, and combining them with ipi might be better still. It is too soon to tell, though.
Targeted therapy tends to stop working after a year or so, but even here we are seeing some long-term survivors. Some people have even stopped taking drug and are still OK.
Future research is focusing on three areas: finding new therapies that will do even better, finding drugs that work on the the more rare sub-types of melanoma, and (to your point) finding out who will respond to which drug and why.
The good news is that we now have several drugs in the mix, any of which might be that magic bullet for any given patient.
Tim–MRF
-
- August 17, 2015 at 3:41 am
Tim,
Thank you for the reply, just trying to wrap my head around all of these treatment options and hope that one is the magic bullet for me and for all of us some day!
-
- August 17, 2015 at 7:27 am
Dave
Not sure if this (Australian) article has any new info in it for you:
Stars
-
- August 17, 2015 at 7:27 am
Dave
Not sure if this (Australian) article has any new info in it for you:
Stars
-
- August 17, 2015 at 7:27 am
Dave
Not sure if this (Australian) article has any new info in it for you:
Stars
-
- August 17, 2015 at 3:41 am
Tim,
Thank you for the reply, just trying to wrap my head around all of these treatment options and hope that one is the magic bullet for me and for all of us some day!
-
- August 17, 2015 at 3:41 am
Tim,
Thank you for the reply, just trying to wrap my head around all of these treatment options and hope that one is the magic bullet for me and for all of us some day!
-
- August 17, 2015 at 3:08 am
Unfortunately know one can predict who will respond to what therapy. The old drug IL-2 had about a 4-5% rate of people being long-term responders. I know people who are 10+ years out and are still NED, after having multiple metastases in multiple organs.
The new immunotherapy drugs are showing similar signs, and perhaps with higher numbers. Yervoy (ipilimumab or "ipi") was the first drug in this category and I know people who are 10+ years out on that drug as well. The anti-PD1 drugs are too new to have those kinds of long-term survival numbers but many people anticipate that the numbers will be even larger, and combining them with ipi might be better still. It is too soon to tell, though.
Targeted therapy tends to stop working after a year or so, but even here we are seeing some long-term survivors. Some people have even stopped taking drug and are still OK.
Future research is focusing on three areas: finding new therapies that will do even better, finding drugs that work on the the more rare sub-types of melanoma, and (to your point) finding out who will respond to which drug and why.
The good news is that we now have several drugs in the mix, any of which might be that magic bullet for any given patient.
Tim–MRF
-
- August 17, 2015 at 3:08 am
Unfortunately know one can predict who will respond to what therapy. The old drug IL-2 had about a 4-5% rate of people being long-term responders. I know people who are 10+ years out and are still NED, after having multiple metastases in multiple organs.
The new immunotherapy drugs are showing similar signs, and perhaps with higher numbers. Yervoy (ipilimumab or "ipi") was the first drug in this category and I know people who are 10+ years out on that drug as well. The anti-PD1 drugs are too new to have those kinds of long-term survival numbers but many people anticipate that the numbers will be even larger, and combining them with ipi might be better still. It is too soon to tell, though.
Targeted therapy tends to stop working after a year or so, but even here we are seeing some long-term survivors. Some people have even stopped taking drug and are still OK.
Future research is focusing on three areas: finding new therapies that will do even better, finding drugs that work on the the more rare sub-types of melanoma, and (to your point) finding out who will respond to which drug and why.
The good news is that we now have several drugs in the mix, any of which might be that magic bullet for any given patient.
Tim–MRF
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.