The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Anyone ever know anybody who had sub-micro metastsis to a lymph node and it never come back?

Forums General Melanoma Community Anyone ever know anybody who had sub-micro metastsis to a lymph node and it never come back?

  • Post
    1friend
    Participant

      I am sure they exist, but I have never heard about anybody who did the "watch and observe" after a positive node detection and be cured at that point. Seems it always comes back and they have to have the CLND anyway.

      Please let me know if you or someone you know of has been so fortunate.

       

      Thanks

    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Replies
        Jydnew
        Participant

          Hi,

          I don't know what a sub-micrometastasis means, but I think I have a similar case for you.  My husband was dx 12.5 years ago with stage 3a, at age 26.  Originally, we got the call that his lymph nodes were clear.  They did some more staining on them and found micromets in 1 lymph node.  I remember the path report said something like "loose collection of cells" in one part of that lymph node, and in another it said "not more than 10 cells."  So, apparently, a very small amount of the cancer had spread.

          He has been NED since, with observation only.  He was scanned 4x a year for the first 2 years, and then 2x a year for the next 3 years, and then 1x a year until 11 years out from the dx, and now he is not scanned at all, which scares the crap out of me, but so be it.  His doctor said that at this point, the damage from the scans is greater than the chance of recurrance.  He gets yearly bloodwork, sees the oncologist once a year and the dermatologist twice a year.

          Take care…

          Jydnew
          Participant

            Hi,

            I don't know what a sub-micrometastasis means, but I think I have a similar case for you.  My husband was dx 12.5 years ago with stage 3a, at age 26.  Originally, we got the call that his lymph nodes were clear.  They did some more staining on them and found micromets in 1 lymph node.  I remember the path report said something like "loose collection of cells" in one part of that lymph node, and in another it said "not more than 10 cells."  So, apparently, a very small amount of the cancer had spread.

            He has been NED since, with observation only.  He was scanned 4x a year for the first 2 years, and then 2x a year for the next 3 years, and then 1x a year until 11 years out from the dx, and now he is not scanned at all, which scares the crap out of me, but so be it.  His doctor said that at this point, the damage from the scans is greater than the chance of recurrance.  He gets yearly bloodwork, sees the oncologist once a year and the dermatologist twice a year.

            Take care…

            Jydnew
            Participant

              Hi,

              I don't know what a sub-micrometastasis means, but I think I have a similar case for you.  My husband was dx 12.5 years ago with stage 3a, at age 26.  Originally, we got the call that his lymph nodes were clear.  They did some more staining on them and found micromets in 1 lymph node.  I remember the path report said something like "loose collection of cells" in one part of that lymph node, and in another it said "not more than 10 cells."  So, apparently, a very small amount of the cancer had spread.

              He has been NED since, with observation only.  He was scanned 4x a year for the first 2 years, and then 2x a year for the next 3 years, and then 1x a year until 11 years out from the dx, and now he is not scanned at all, which scares the crap out of me, but so be it.  His doctor said that at this point, the damage from the scans is greater than the chance of recurrance.  He gets yearly bloodwork, sees the oncologist once a year and the dermatologist twice a year.

              Take care…

          Viewing 2 reply threads
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
          About the MRF Patient Forum

          The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

          The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

          Popular Topics