Doc says no SNB if FISH test comes back negative
REGISTER
The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Doc says no SNB if FISH test comes back negative

› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Doc says no SNB if FISH test comes back negative

  • Post
    • October 31, 2014 at 5:07 pm
    SMGY1978
    Participant

    To date, my 8yo son has only had the mole on his scalp removed by the dermatoloist.  (Initial pathology yielded "spitzoid melanoma" – Clark IV, Breslow 2.1 mm, 3/mm mitotic rate).

     

    Next, we're discussing the plan of action with Oncology/Plastic Surgery/Pathology.   They're tentatively scheduling surgery for Nov 7th.  Today, the Oncologist said if the FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) test comes back negative, they'll only do a re-excision.  If it's positive, they'll do the wide excision AND SNB.  They have a concensus that the tissue is "borderline" melanoma.  

     

    Thoughts?   Anyone have negative FISH results, but had problems down the road?

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Replies
      • October 31, 2014 at 6:45 pm
      Janner
      Participant

      Negative FISH test basically says it is benign.  So if it were benign, what advantage would there be checking the lymph nodes?  Sptiz Nevi are common in kids and if it is determined to be a Spitz and not melanoma, I guess I don't see any advantage to additional surgery.

      In all my years on the board, I've never heard of anyone who has done the FISH test and later has metastatic melanoma at a later date.  The FISH test isn't always conclusive, but if there were any question on the results, I'm sure they'd do the SNB.

      • October 31, 2014 at 6:45 pm
      Janner
      Participant

      Negative FISH test basically says it is benign.  So if it were benign, what advantage would there be checking the lymph nodes?  Sptiz Nevi are common in kids and if it is determined to be a Spitz and not melanoma, I guess I don't see any advantage to additional surgery.

      In all my years on the board, I've never heard of anyone who has done the FISH test and later has metastatic melanoma at a later date.  The FISH test isn't always conclusive, but if there were any question on the results, I'm sure they'd do the SNB.

      • October 31, 2014 at 6:45 pm
      Janner
      Participant

      Negative FISH test basically says it is benign.  So if it were benign, what advantage would there be checking the lymph nodes?  Sptiz Nevi are common in kids and if it is determined to be a Spitz and not melanoma, I guess I don't see any advantage to additional surgery.

      In all my years on the board, I've never heard of anyone who has done the FISH test and later has metastatic melanoma at a later date.  The FISH test isn't always conclusive, but if there were any question on the results, I'm sure they'd do the SNB.

        • October 31, 2014 at 8:13 pm
        Becky
        Participant

        To me the plan sounds good. Something else to consider is that benign spitz nevus can sometimes spread to the lymph nodes (still beign but can be confusing to pathologists) so I would use the FISH test as the definitive answer and only do the WLE  if its is neganitve.

        • October 31, 2014 at 8:13 pm
        Becky
        Participant

        To me the plan sounds good. Something else to consider is that benign spitz nevus can sometimes spread to the lymph nodes (still beign but can be confusing to pathologists) so I would use the FISH test as the definitive answer and only do the WLE  if its is neganitve.

        • October 31, 2014 at 8:13 pm
        Becky
        Participant

        To me the plan sounds good. Something else to consider is that benign spitz nevus can sometimes spread to the lymph nodes (still beign but can be confusing to pathologists) so I would use the FISH test as the definitive answer and only do the WLE  if its is neganitve.

        • October 31, 2014 at 9:14 pm
        Becky
        Participant

        Also, I cam across this article a few years back when I was researching my sons dx. I thought it was pretty informative, although long. You may want to take a look. It addresses some of the questions you have

        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797485/

         

         

         

         

        • October 31, 2014 at 9:14 pm
        Becky
        Participant

        Also, I cam across this article a few years back when I was researching my sons dx. I thought it was pretty informative, although long. You may want to take a look. It addresses some of the questions you have

        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797485/

         

         

         

         

        • October 31, 2014 at 9:14 pm
        Becky
        Participant

        Also, I cam across this article a few years back when I was researching my sons dx. I thought it was pretty informative, although long. You may want to take a look. It addresses some of the questions you have

        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797485/

         

         

         

         

      • October 31, 2014 at 9:55 pm
      Lil0909
      Participant

      Sooo…. the "rules" could definitely be different for a child v. an adult, and I am by no means a dr, and I would have no idea what to do in your situation… but my pathology report says "FISH studies were performed which were negative for copy number aberrations in 6, 11, and 9", I had SNB done, and came back with micro metastasis in 1 of 3 sentinel nodes.  Now Stage 3a.

      • October 31, 2014 at 9:55 pm
      Lil0909
      Participant

      Sooo…. the "rules" could definitely be different for a child v. an adult, and I am by no means a dr, and I would have no idea what to do in your situation… but my pathology report says "FISH studies were performed which were negative for copy number aberrations in 6, 11, and 9", I had SNB done, and came back with micro metastasis in 1 of 3 sentinel nodes.  Now Stage 3a.

      • October 31, 2014 at 9:55 pm
      Lil0909
      Participant

      Sooo…. the "rules" could definitely be different for a child v. an adult, and I am by no means a dr, and I would have no idea what to do in your situation… but my pathology report says "FISH studies were performed which were negative for copy number aberrations in 6, 11, and 9", I had SNB done, and came back with micro metastasis in 1 of 3 sentinel nodes.  Now Stage 3a.

Viewing 5 reply threads

Tagged: 

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Popular Topics