Can’t we have the number of views back?
REGISTER
The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Can’t we have the number of views back?

› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Can’t we have the number of views back?

  • Post
    • December 26, 2013 at 3:22 pm
    lou2
    Participant

    The counts went crazy, so that feature was apparently removed.  Now we are speaking to a blank wall. 

    Couldn't we have this feature fixed?  It gives a sense of community to know people are out there.  Otherwise, there are only a few replies, or none at all and you wonder: Is anyone there?  Without these counts, who knows?

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Replies
      • December 26, 2013 at 5:07 pm
      casagrayson
      Participant

      I agree.  Even if you have no responses, the counts tell you something — usually that you have a question that isn't easily answered!

      • December 26, 2013 at 5:07 pm
      casagrayson
      Participant

      I agree.  Even if you have no responses, the counts tell you something — usually that you have a question that isn't easily answered!

      • December 26, 2013 at 5:07 pm
      casagrayson
      Participant

      I agree.  Even if you have no responses, the counts tell you something — usually that you have a question that isn't easily answered!

      • December 27, 2013 at 3:40 am
      JerryfromFauq
      Participant

      I suspect there has behttp://pdfsb.com/search/?q=yard+pro+model+no.+crd125-38&p=4&lng=en&pgs=10en some kind of overal counting problem since the numbers of people on at any timew jumped from the hundredths to the thousands with the new sprogram.  Hooefully they are working o n getting the counts  under control.   It does help to see if someone has not gotten a resoinse and is feeling aabaandoned as can be athe case/

       

      • December 27, 2013 at 3:40 am
      JerryfromFauq
      Participant

      I suspect there has behttp://pdfsb.com/search/?q=yard+pro+model+no.+crd125-38&p=4&lng=en&pgs=10en some kind of overal counting problem since the numbers of people on at any timew jumped from the hundredths to the thousands with the new sprogram.  Hooefully they are working o n getting the counts  under control.   It does help to see if someone has not gotten a resoinse and is feeling aabaandoned as can be athe case/

       

      • December 27, 2013 at 3:40 am
      JerryfromFauq
      Participant

      I suspect there has behttp://pdfsb.com/search/?q=yard+pro+model+no.+crd125-38&p=4&lng=en&pgs=10en some kind of overal counting problem since the numbers of people on at any timew jumped from the hundredths to the thousands with the new sprogram.  Hooefully they are working o n getting the counts  under control.   It does help to see if someone has not gotten a resoinse and is feeling aabaandoned as can be athe case/

       

        • December 30, 2013 at 10:46 pm
        Cooper
        Participant

        I can't see why high in the sky counts mattered if they were incorrect.  There are only so many melanoma patients on this earth afterall.

        • December 30, 2013 at 10:46 pm
        Cooper
        Participant

        I can't see why high in the sky counts mattered if they were incorrect.  There are only so many melanoma patients on this earth afterall.

        • December 30, 2013 at 10:46 pm
        Cooper
        Participant

        I can't see why high in the sky counts mattered if they were incorrect.  There are only so many melanoma patients on this earth afterall.

        • January 2, 2014 at 10:11 pm
        JerryfromFauq
        Participant

        The number of response counts used to be correct. I think the number of people on line were to.  The on-line count went crazy.  Wish all counts would be made correct again.

         

        • January 2, 2014 at 10:11 pm
        JerryfromFauq
        Participant

        The number of response counts used to be correct. I think the number of people on line were to.  The on-line count went crazy.  Wish all counts would be made correct again.

         

        • January 2, 2014 at 10:11 pm
        JerryfromFauq
        Participant

        The number of response counts used to be correct. I think the number of people on line were to.  The on-line count went crazy.  Wish all counts would be made correct again.

         

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Popular Topics