The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Newly diagnosed stage 1a

Forums General Melanoma Community Newly diagnosed stage 1a

  • Post
    jms0104
    Participant

    I know my stage of 1a makes me very lucky, but I'm anxious nonetheless.  Dx last week with a suspicious mole on my torso, punch biopsy, stage 1a, .45mm, no ulceration.  I also have MS and have been taking an immunomodulator for the past 11 years, that I am strongly considering stopping.  Will I need a node biopsy for 1a?  Reading lots of horror stories with other Stage 1ers coming back at stage 4 much later down the road.  

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Replies
      Janner
      Participant

      SNB is not typically done for a lesion like yours.  As bad as it seems, you are in a good place.  As for stories on the internet, keep it all in context.  For every one "bad" story, there's nine stories that are good.  (Even better than 9/10 for stage 1a).  Those people just have no reason to post their success.  The only people who have reason to stay on websites and post after getting over the shock of being diagnosed are the ones that recur.  And yes, some do.  Most don't.  There is no way to know which group you are in but your stats look very good. 

      Janner
      Participant

      SNB is not typically done for a lesion like yours.  As bad as it seems, you are in a good place.  As for stories on the internet, keep it all in context.  For every one "bad" story, there's nine stories that are good.  (Even better than 9/10 for stage 1a).  Those people just have no reason to post their success.  The only people who have reason to stay on websites and post after getting over the shock of being diagnosed are the ones that recur.  And yes, some do.  Most don't.  There is no way to know which group you are in but your stats look very good. 

        jms0104
        Participant

        Thanks Janner.  Looks like you started out in a similar fashion.  Assume you have been NDE for quite some time?

         

        Best,

        jms0104
        Participant

        Thanks Janner.  Looks like you started out in a similar fashion.  Assume you have been NDE for quite some time?

         

        Best,

        Janner
        Participant

        I was first diagnosed in 1992.  I've had 3 melanomas but I'm still stage 1b. 

        Janner
        Participant

        I was first diagnosed in 1992.  I've had 3 melanomas but I'm still stage 1b. 

        jms0104
        Participant

        if the lesion is excised, wouldn't you bee NED vs. 1b?

         

         

        jms0104
        Participant

        if the lesion is excised, wouldn't you bee NED vs. 1b?

         

         

        jennunicorn
        Participant

        NED is something you tag onto your stage, like 1b NED, 3b NED, etc. But the stage remains, if that helps clarify that. With low stages 1 through 2 the NED part is mostly assumed, since surgery is the treatment and there wouldn't be any other evidence of disease once removed.

        jennunicorn
        Participant

        NED is something you tag onto your stage, like 1b NED, 3b NED, etc. But the stage remains, if that helps clarify that. With low stages 1 through 2 the NED part is mostly assumed, since surgery is the treatment and there wouldn't be any other evidence of disease once removed.

        jms0104
        Participant

        helpful, thanks

        jms0104
        Participant

        helpful, thanks

        jms0104
        Participant

        helpful, thanks

        jennunicorn
        Participant

        NED is something you tag onto your stage, like 1b NED, 3b NED, etc. But the stage remains, if that helps clarify that. With low stages 1 through 2 the NED part is mostly assumed, since surgery is the treatment and there wouldn't be any other evidence of disease once removed.

        jms0104
        Participant

        if the lesion is excised, wouldn't you bee NED vs. 1b?

         

         

        Janner
        Participant

        I was first diagnosed in 1992.  I've had 3 melanomas but I'm still stage 1b. 

        jms0104
        Participant

        Thanks Janner.  Looks like you started out in a similar fashion.  Assume you have been NDE for quite some time?

         

        Best,

      Janner
      Participant

      SNB is not typically done for a lesion like yours.  As bad as it seems, you are in a good place.  As for stories on the internet, keep it all in context.  For every one "bad" story, there's nine stories that are good.  (Even better than 9/10 for stage 1a).  Those people just have no reason to post their success.  The only people who have reason to stay on websites and post after getting over the shock of being diagnosed are the ones that recur.  And yes, some do.  Most don't.  There is no way to know which group you are in but your stats look very good. 

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.