Scan Schedule
REGISTER
The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Scan Schedule

› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Scan Schedule

  • Post
    • July 13, 2015 at 11:38 pm
    JoshF
    Participant

    I have Pet/CT on Wednesday. I must have forgot it was a Pet. For those familiar with my story, after I had surgery in January to remove the recurrence or whatever was left after ipi and IL-2 they did a Pet which was clear followed by a CT in April that was clear. Just not sure why another Pet so soon. Of course I'll ask. Think I was too excited last time to even think about it and now some serious scanxiety is setting in. As usual trying to rationalize everything going on in my head.

    Josh

Viewing 11 reply threads
  • Replies
      • July 14, 2015 at 4:25 am
      kimgibler
      Participant

      Best of luck to you.  I'm not sure why, but I think it's good to keep a close eye on things.  We're in Chicago too…at NW w/Dr Kuzel.  Will be thinking of you.

       

      • July 14, 2015 at 4:25 am
      kimgibler
      Participant

      Best of luck to you.  I'm not sure why, but I think it's good to keep a close eye on things.  We're in Chicago too…at NW w/Dr Kuzel.  Will be thinking of you.

       

      • July 14, 2015 at 4:25 am
      kimgibler
      Participant

      Best of luck to you.  I'm not sure why, but I think it's good to keep a close eye on things.  We're in Chicago too…at NW w/Dr Kuzel.  Will be thinking of you.

       

      • July 14, 2015 at 1:09 pm
      ed williams
      Participant

      Hi Josh, this might sound a little bit funny but I kind of like having scans. I like knowing what is going on with the melanoma inside my old body, or maybe it is just because I have had so many scans being part of a clinical trial. It could be that I have just got used to them as part of the routine. I am not sure why they are going for the Pet/Ct again vs just a Ct. Maybe your oncology team find them more informative than the regular CT scan. Wishing you go scan results!!!! Ed

      • July 14, 2015 at 1:09 pm
      ed williams
      Participant

      Hi Josh, this might sound a little bit funny but I kind of like having scans. I like knowing what is going on with the melanoma inside my old body, or maybe it is just because I have had so many scans being part of a clinical trial. It could be that I have just got used to them as part of the routine. I am not sure why they are going for the Pet/Ct again vs just a Ct. Maybe your oncology team find them more informative than the regular CT scan. Wishing you go scan results!!!! Ed

      • July 14, 2015 at 1:09 pm
      ed williams
      Participant

      Hi Josh, this might sound a little bit funny but I kind of like having scans. I like knowing what is going on with the melanoma inside my old body, or maybe it is just because I have had so many scans being part of a clinical trial. It could be that I have just got used to them as part of the routine. I am not sure why they are going for the Pet/Ct again vs just a Ct. Maybe your oncology team find them more informative than the regular CT scan. Wishing you go scan results!!!! Ed

      • July 16, 2015 at 12:44 am
      _Paul_
      Participant

      Hey Josh, I am right in line behind you, as I have a CT scheduled for Friday. This will be the first scan in about six months for me.

      I hope you don't have to wait too long for your results, so that you don't have to endure too much more scanxiety.

      I had a good conversation with my oncologist recently about PETs vs. CTs, and the plan we have come up with is to scan every 3 months alternating between PET and CT. I think the PET is better at finding new tumors and the vitality of existing ones, but the CT is better at resolving existing ones. Also, the PET has so much radiation (http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20100331/faq-radiation-risk-from-medical-imaging: "Getting a nuclear medicine study [sic: PET] exposes a patient to as much radiation as 10 to 2,050 chest X-rays") that it seems to make sense to limit them.

      – Paul

      • July 16, 2015 at 12:44 am
      _Paul_
      Participant

      Hey Josh, I am right in line behind you, as I have a CT scheduled for Friday. This will be the first scan in about six months for me.

      I hope you don't have to wait too long for your results, so that you don't have to endure too much more scanxiety.

      I had a good conversation with my oncologist recently about PETs vs. CTs, and the plan we have come up with is to scan every 3 months alternating between PET and CT. I think the PET is better at finding new tumors and the vitality of existing ones, but the CT is better at resolving existing ones. Also, the PET has so much radiation (http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20100331/faq-radiation-risk-from-medical-imaging: "Getting a nuclear medicine study [sic: PET] exposes a patient to as much radiation as 10 to 2,050 chest X-rays") that it seems to make sense to limit them.

      – Paul

      • July 16, 2015 at 12:44 am
      _Paul_
      Participant

      Hey Josh, I am right in line behind you, as I have a CT scheduled for Friday. This will be the first scan in about six months for me.

      I hope you don't have to wait too long for your results, so that you don't have to endure too much more scanxiety.

      I had a good conversation with my oncologist recently about PETs vs. CTs, and the plan we have come up with is to scan every 3 months alternating between PET and CT. I think the PET is better at finding new tumors and the vitality of existing ones, but the CT is better at resolving existing ones. Also, the PET has so much radiation (http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20100331/faq-radiation-risk-from-medical-imaging: "Getting a nuclear medicine study [sic: PET] exposes a patient to as much radiation as 10 to 2,050 chest X-rays") that it seems to make sense to limit them.

      – Paul

      • July 16, 2015 at 3:42 pm
      arthurjedi007
      Participant

      Hope your scan went well and you get the results you are wanting.

      Artie

      • July 16, 2015 at 3:42 pm
      arthurjedi007
      Participant

      Hope your scan went well and you get the results you are wanting.

      Artie

      • July 16, 2015 at 3:42 pm
      arthurjedi007
      Participant

      Hope your scan went well and you get the results you are wanting.

      Artie

Viewing 11 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Popular Topics