The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

smatlock41

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Replies
      smatlock41
      Participant
      I’m scheduled to have a small excision done by a plastic surgeon on the 27th to make sure everything is clear.
      smatlock41
      Participant
      I’m scheduled to have a small excision done by a plastic surgeon on the 27th to make sure everything is clear.
      smatlock41
      Participant

      My dermatologist office.  That was my first appointment there and I wasn't impressed with the doctor at all.  On the first pathology report the first diagnosis was r/o atypia, and the final diagnosis after stainings etc. was melanoma insitu. On the report it had a doctors name Robert Chen but was signed by my dermatologist which I thought was strange.   I decided to go to a doctor at Vanderbilt and that is when I decided to pick up my slides from my dermatologists office and take them there for a second review. 

      smatlock41
      Participant

      My dermatologist office.  That was my first appointment there and I wasn't impressed with the doctor at all.  On the first pathology report the first diagnosis was r/o atypia, and the final diagnosis after stainings etc. was melanoma insitu. On the report it had a doctors name Robert Chen but was signed by my dermatologist which I thought was strange.   I decided to go to a doctor at Vanderbilt and that is when I decided to pick up my slides from my dermatologists office and take them there for a second review. 

      smatlock41
      Participant

      The second report says "junctional nevus with marked architectural and cytologic atypia, shave margins appear to be free of the junctional melanocytic proliferation.  Looks like 3 pathologists checked this out before they signed off on this report.  Still waiting on the doctor to call to see what needs to be done.  I'm assuming they will want to go in and do an excision but I'm wondering how much they will take.  The spot is only about 1/4 inch now.  I guess we will see.  

      smatlock41
      Participant

      The second report says "junctional nevus with marked architectural and cytologic atypia, shave margins appear to be free of the junctional melanocytic proliferation.  Looks like 3 pathologists checked this out before they signed off on this report.  Still waiting on the doctor to call to see what needs to be done.  I'm assuming they will want to go in and do an excision but I'm wondering how much they will take.  The spot is only about 1/4 inch now.  I guess we will see.  

      smatlock41
      Participant

      The second report says "junctional nevus with marked architectural and cytologic atypia, shave margins appear to be free of the junctional melanocytic proliferation.  Looks like 3 pathologists checked this out before they signed off on this report.  Still waiting on the doctor to call to see what needs to be done.  I'm assuming they will want to go in and do an excision but I'm wondering how much they will take.  The spot is only about 1/4 inch now.  I guess we will see. 

      smatlock41
      Participant

      The second report says "junctional nevus with marked architectural and cytologic atypia, shave margins appear to be free of the junctional melanocytic proliferation.  Looks like 3 pathologists checked this out before they signed off on this report.  Still waiting on the doctor to call to see what needs to be done.  I'm assuming they will want to go in and do an excision but I'm wondering how much they will take.  The spot is only about 1/4 inch now.  I guess we will see. 

      smatlock41
      Participant

      I can't help but wonder if that is the case as well.  I will post tomorrow after I find out what the 2nd report says.  Thank you so much for you replies I really appreciate it.

      smatlock41
      Participant

      I can't help but wonder if that is the case as well.  I will post tomorrow after I find out what the 2nd report says.  Thank you so much for you replies I really appreciate it.

      smatlock41
      Participant

      Thank you so much for your reply.  The sample that was taken was .5cm X .5cm and on the first pathology report it said "poorly circumscribed asymmetrical poliferation of melanocytes with severe cytologic atypia arranged in irregular nests and as single cells at the basal layer of the epidermis.  Atypical melanocytes are identified at higher levels of the epidermis.  The poliferation does not appear to extend into the underlying dermis.  Anti-S100, -HMB45, -MART1, and -MiTF atibodies all label the atypical melanocytes." 

      I will have to wait until tomorrow before I can see exactly what the second report says. 

      smatlock41
      Participant

      Thank you so much for your reply.  The sample that was taken was .5cm X .5cm and on the first pathology report it said "poorly circumscribed asymmetrical poliferation of melanocytes with severe cytologic atypia arranged in irregular nests and as single cells at the basal layer of the epidermis.  Atypical melanocytes are identified at higher levels of the epidermis.  The poliferation does not appear to extend into the underlying dermis.  Anti-S100, -HMB45, -MART1, and -MiTF atibodies all label the atypical melanocytes." 

      I will have to wait until tomorrow before I can see exactly what the second report says. 

      smatlock41
      Participant

      I will have to wait until tomorrow before I can see exactly what the second report says. 

      smatlock41
      Participant

      I will have to wait until tomorrow before I can see exactly what the second report says. 

      smatlock41
      Participant

      Thank you so much for your reply.  The sample that was taken was .5cm X .5cm and on the first pathology report it said "poorly circumscribed asymmetrical poliferation of melanocytes with severe cytologic atypia arranged in irregular nests and as single cells at the basal layer of the epidermis.  Atypical melanocytes are identified at higher levels of the epidermis.  The poliferation does not appear to extend into the underlying dermis.  Anti-S100, -HMB45, -MART1, and -MiTF atibodies all label the atypical melanocytes."

Viewing 1 reply thread
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Popular Topics