The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

AngelaM

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • Replies
      AngelaM
      Participant

      My derm would re-excise. No atypical cells would ever have been left there to begin with. We are ultra conservative.

      AngelaM
      Participant

      My derm would re-excise. No atypical cells would ever have been left there to begin with. We are ultra conservative.

      AngelaM
      Participant

      My derm would re-excise. No atypical cells would ever have been left there to begin with. We are ultra conservative.

      AngelaM
      Participant
      I had my first melanoma at 28. It was also in-situ. I then had 2 more within the same 2 year period, but unfortunately they were invasive. It’s a common cancer in women our age, so don’t think that it’s strange for you to have had a melanoma at age 27. It’s not.

      The waiting is hard, but you mustn’t think the worst. You are aware now and that’s what’s going to count in your favor. Your melanoma was in-situ so it can’t spread. Calm down and wait for the results of the shave biopsy before you worry too much. Most people only ever get one melanoma. I’m an exception.

      Good luck

      AngelaM
      Participant
      I had my first melanoma at 28. It was also in-situ. I then had 2 more within the same 2 year period, but unfortunately they were invasive. It’s a common cancer in women our age, so don’t think that it’s strange for you to have had a melanoma at age 27. It’s not.

      The waiting is hard, but you mustn’t think the worst. You are aware now and that’s what’s going to count in your favor. Your melanoma was in-situ so it can’t spread. Calm down and wait for the results of the shave biopsy before you worry too much. Most people only ever get one melanoma. I’m an exception.

      Good luck

      AngelaM
      Participant
      I had my first melanoma at 28. It was also in-situ. I then had 2 more within the same 2 year period, but unfortunately they were invasive. It’s a common cancer in women our age, so don’t think that it’s strange for you to have had a melanoma at age 27. It’s not.

      The waiting is hard, but you mustn’t think the worst. You are aware now and that’s what’s going to count in your favor. Your melanoma was in-situ so it can’t spread. Calm down and wait for the results of the shave biopsy before you worry too much. Most people only ever get one melanoma. I’m an exception.

      Good luck

      AngelaM
      Participant
      Hi Leigh,
      I see that there have been many responses to your topic already, but I thought I would tell you what I have been told.

      Firstly, I had 3 primary melanomas in 2 years. 1 in-situ and 2 stage 1A’s. The first melanoma was in-situ and 3 months later I fell pregnant. The second melanoma grew during the third trimester and was removed shortly after the birth. The third melanoma appeared just before my son turned 1. At that point my oncologist and derm told me to wait 2 years if I wanted another child, which I do. I also read everything I could find and asked a thousand questions. My doctors said that pregnancy is an immunosuppressive state. That coupled with growth hormones and increased melanin production (like the ‘mask’ of pregnancy) could be a recipe for disaster. I think my greatest risk is more primaries more than anything else, but the worry in my case is that they appear overnight and don’t take months to grow like everyone else’s seem to.

      I also live on the other side of the world to the US. We have a very high rate of melanoma here and the sun is blistering almost every day of the year. When I asked my oncologist about the research regarding pregnancy and melanoma and how it basically has found no link he got all flustered and said it’s not accurate.

      You must make the best decision for you. If I were in your shoes I would honestly be happy with 2 daughters and concentrate on being their mother for as long as possible. Good luck with your decision!

      AngelaM
      Participant
      Hi Leigh,
      I see that there have been many responses to your topic already, but I thought I would tell you what I have been told.

      Firstly, I had 3 primary melanomas in 2 years. 1 in-situ and 2 stage 1A’s. The first melanoma was in-situ and 3 months later I fell pregnant. The second melanoma grew during the third trimester and was removed shortly after the birth. The third melanoma appeared just before my son turned 1. At that point my oncologist and derm told me to wait 2 years if I wanted another child, which I do. I also read everything I could find and asked a thousand questions. My doctors said that pregnancy is an immunosuppressive state. That coupled with growth hormones and increased melanin production (like the ‘mask’ of pregnancy) could be a recipe for disaster. I think my greatest risk is more primaries more than anything else, but the worry in my case is that they appear overnight and don’t take months to grow like everyone else’s seem to.

      I also live on the other side of the world to the US. We have a very high rate of melanoma here and the sun is blistering almost every day of the year. When I asked my oncologist about the research regarding pregnancy and melanoma and how it basically has found no link he got all flustered and said it’s not accurate.

      You must make the best decision for you. If I were in your shoes I would honestly be happy with 2 daughters and concentrate on being their mother for as long as possible. Good luck with your decision!

      AngelaM
      Participant
      Hi Leigh,
      I see that there have been many responses to your topic already, but I thought I would tell you what I have been told.

      Firstly, I had 3 primary melanomas in 2 years. 1 in-situ and 2 stage 1A’s. The first melanoma was in-situ and 3 months later I fell pregnant. The second melanoma grew during the third trimester and was removed shortly after the birth. The third melanoma appeared just before my son turned 1. At that point my oncologist and derm told me to wait 2 years if I wanted another child, which I do. I also read everything I could find and asked a thousand questions. My doctors said that pregnancy is an immunosuppressive state. That coupled with growth hormones and increased melanin production (like the ‘mask’ of pregnancy) could be a recipe for disaster. I think my greatest risk is more primaries more than anything else, but the worry in my case is that they appear overnight and don’t take months to grow like everyone else’s seem to.

      I also live on the other side of the world to the US. We have a very high rate of melanoma here and the sun is blistering almost every day of the year. When I asked my oncologist about the research regarding pregnancy and melanoma and how it basically has found no link he got all flustered and said it’s not accurate.

      You must make the best decision for you. If I were in your shoes I would honestly be happy with 2 daughters and concentrate on being their mother for as long as possible. Good luck with your decision!

      AngelaM
      Participant
      Your website’s data is not accurate.

      Latest stats released in SA – 62 cases per 10,000 inhabitants. It’s a known fact amongst our medical fraternity that our incidence surpasses any other country. Our UV radiation levels also measure amongst the highest in the world, at 12.

      AngelaM
      Participant
      Your website’s data is not accurate.

      Latest stats released in SA – 62 cases per 10,000 inhabitants. It’s a known fact amongst our medical fraternity that our incidence surpasses any other country. Our UV radiation levels also measure amongst the highest in the world, at 12.

      AngelaM
      Participant
      Your website’s data is not accurate.

      Latest stats released in SA – 62 cases per 10,000 inhabitants. It’s a known fact amongst our medical fraternity that our incidence surpasses any other country. Our UV radiation levels also measure amongst the highest in the world, at 12.

      AngelaM
      Participant

      Actually, South Africans get more melanomas than anyone else in the world …

      AngelaM
      Participant

      Actually, South Africans get more melanomas than anyone else in the world …

      AngelaM
      Participant

      Actually, South Africans get more melanomas than anyone else in the world …

Viewing 8 reply threads
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Popular Topics