› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Spitzoid Melanoma – Second Review UCSF
- This topic has 1 reply, 1 voice, and was last updated 6 years, 3 months ago by pnwander27.
- Post
-
- August 30, 2018 at 8:34 pm
I am contemplating sending my pathology for a second look to UCSF. My pathology was Atypical Spitzoid classified as melnoma. I had the wide excision, SLNB not recommended.
My reasoning for a second look is that spitzoid melanoma is rare, and they are specialists. I am at a great hospital in Baltimore, but have heard many people on this site suggest a second look from UCSF since they see these more frequently. Any thoughts on this in terms of what information I may gain from doing so? Is genetic testing sometimes a piece of this second analysis? Basically, I want to be as armed as possible in the event this progresses.
Any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you.
- Replies
-
-
- September 4, 2018 at 1:19 am
Hi MMH,
I can't help answer some of the specific quesitons you have, however I just contacted UCSF about sending my pathology slides down for a second opinion.
I had a punch biopsy done which confirmed a junctional spitz nevus, however in a few days I'm going in to have a WLE done to remove more tissue as this type of nevus is commonly misdiagnosed. I'm from Canada and am hoping I will be able to send my pathology slides down for a second review. Our health care system is a little different up here.
Since you are from the States it would probably be an easy process for you. I would definitely recommend doing so for peace of mind and just a second opinion altogether.
Hoping someone else can maybe help answer those specific questions.
Keep us posted!
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.