“Problematic and interesting” Pathology Report
REGISTER
The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

“Problematic and interesting” Pathology Report

› Forums › General Melanoma Community › “Problematic and interesting” Pathology Report

  • Post
    • April 22, 2014 at 12:52 am
    madeline685
    Participant

    Hi All –

     

    I had a mole on my stomach , of about six years, removed last month (I am 28). After more than 3 weeks of not hearing back on the path report, I assumed no news was good news. I finally heard from my dermatologist that it came back positive for melanoma. 

    I am waiting for my scheduleed appointment with an oncologist, but did see my pathology report. It took so long because the lab actually consulted with another doctor on the pathology slides for help interpreting. The second consultation saw no vascular invasion, but noted that it was an "unusual" melanoma and noted to the lab "thank you for forwarding this problematic and interesting" case. 

    Of course I can't help but get nervous with that wording! Has anyone had a similar experience? I am assuming that it is great there is no vascular invasion, but it's hard not to get anxious hearing a doctor call you "problematic…" 

    I am meeting with a few oncologists – surgery, dermatology, and medical oncologist – at the request of the specialosr. We'll discuss treatment, get my (third) consultation, and schedule additonal surgery, but I would love to hear any similar stories.

     

    Cheers!

    M

     

     

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Replies
      • April 22, 2014 at 3:14 am
      Janner
      Participant

      It's not all that unusual for a lab to get a second opinion.  Some places to it routinely, others not as often.  Without actually seeing the 'problematic and interesting' path report, it's really hard to comment more. 

      • April 22, 2014 at 3:14 am
      Janner
      Participant

      It's not all that unusual for a lab to get a second opinion.  Some places to it routinely, others not as often.  Without actually seeing the 'problematic and interesting' path report, it's really hard to comment more. 

      • April 22, 2014 at 3:14 am
      Janner
      Participant

      It's not all that unusual for a lab to get a second opinion.  Some places to it routinely, others not as often.  Without actually seeing the 'problematic and interesting' path report, it's really hard to comment more. 

      • April 22, 2014 at 8:25 am
      tcell
      Participant

      What I think: "Problematic" in this context seems to be science langiage. The lab people are no clinicians so they will not see you or your condition. What maybe was problematic to them was the interpretation of this slide but not necessarily your whole case. For them your case it just a mole they got to interpret.

      • April 22, 2014 at 8:25 am
      tcell
      Participant

      What I think: "Problematic" in this context seems to be science langiage. The lab people are no clinicians so they will not see you or your condition. What maybe was problematic to them was the interpretation of this slide but not necessarily your whole case. For them your case it just a mole they got to interpret.

      • April 22, 2014 at 8:25 am
      tcell
      Participant

      What I think: "Problematic" in this context seems to be science langiage. The lab people are no clinicians so they will not see you or your condition. What maybe was problematic to them was the interpretation of this slide but not necessarily your whole case. For them your case it just a mole they got to interpret.

Viewing 5 reply threads

Tagged: 

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.