› Forums › Cutaneous Melanoma Community › Pathology report, someone please help soon
- This topic has 24 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 3 months ago by kdhill.
- Post
-
- December 3, 2015 at 8:43 pm
Hello so i received this initial report and was wondering if someone could please explain it to me.
From acral skin, there is a compct orthokeratoic scale that overlies the spinous zone and is approximately the same thickness as the prickle cell layer. There is a hint of increased melanin pigment among epithelial cells at the junction, but no distinct proliferation of melanocytes on these initial sections.
Diagnosis: Most consistent with acral lentigo right foot
Note: because of the suspicion for nevus i am going to cut deeper into this block and provide an addendum note.
Is this saying their suspicion it might be cancerous or are they suspicious it might be a mole (nevus). I tried to speak to my dermatologist but she was busy and the front office manager freaked me out by saying theyre probably doing it because it looks cancerous
- Replies
-
-
- December 3, 2015 at 10:07 pm
Acral tissue is different than cutaneous so I'm winging this a bit. An acral lentigo would essentially be a freckle. So the diagnosis is freckle with the caviat that there may be a dermal nevus. A nevus by itself is no big deal – it's a normal mole. So the pathologist will analyze the tissue to distinguish between lentigo and nevus. My initial impression is not that they are suspecting cancer, but they are covering all bases and making sure any deeper tissue is analyzed to make sure nothing untoward shows up.
-
- December 3, 2015 at 10:07 pm
Acral tissue is different than cutaneous so I'm winging this a bit. An acral lentigo would essentially be a freckle. So the diagnosis is freckle with the caviat that there may be a dermal nevus. A nevus by itself is no big deal – it's a normal mole. So the pathologist will analyze the tissue to distinguish between lentigo and nevus. My initial impression is not that they are suspecting cancer, but they are covering all bases and making sure any deeper tissue is analyzed to make sure nothing untoward shows up.
-
- December 5, 2015 at 3:29 am
So I talked to the dermatologist finally and she basically said the same thing. I don't get what it means by deeper cut, like what exactly does that mean or entail?
Janner or anyone else who has knowledge, I'm sure there are case where a few where something suspicous showed up, but typically from reports you've seen this is basically a report saying don't worry it's benign, we're just trying to figure out if its a mole or freckle?
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I would assume they would mention if they saw something suspicous in terms of cancer they would say it?
-
- December 5, 2015 at 4:29 am
Honestly, most path reports these days take a cya attitude. If they see something concerning, they mention it. Err on the side of worst case. Your extra excision seems to be the case of "we don't think there is a problem but we will take more tissue to analyze it -just in case". Typically an excision removes all skin down to the muscle fascia, but on the foot, I'm not sure if they will do that or not. You will have to ask your doc what type of biopsy/excision they intend to do.
-
- December 5, 2015 at 5:04 am
They aren't doing anymore excisions on me. They're just doing it on the sample that was sent already.
So my main question is the report saying they think it might be a benign mole instead of a freckle? Or we think there is a mole that is cancerous is my wondering
-
- December 5, 2015 at 5:24 am
Also to add on to that, i'm guessing even though probablity it's benign they just have to cut deeper to see if its a mole or not and just determine if its okay if it is a mole even though every thing looks fine right now, but they're just making sure?
-
- December 5, 2015 at 5:24 am
Also to add on to that, i'm guessing even though probablity it's benign they just have to cut deeper to see if its a mole or not and just determine if its okay if it is a mole even though every thing looks fine right now, but they're just making sure?
-
- December 5, 2015 at 5:24 am
Also to add on to that, i'm guessing even though probablity it's benign they just have to cut deeper to see if its a mole or not and just determine if its okay if it is a mole even though every thing looks fine right now, but they're just making sure?
-
- December 5, 2015 at 5:48 am
I do not understand 'cut deeper' because typically, all biopsy tissue is analyzed. So that makes no sense to me. Is this a dermatopathologist who is reading the slides? A general pathologist is not the right person. I can't answer your other questions better than I have especially given the fact they aren't taking more tissue. You will have to ask your doc.
-
- December 5, 2015 at 5:48 am
I do not understand 'cut deeper' because typically, all biopsy tissue is analyzed. So that makes no sense to me. Is this a dermatopathologist who is reading the slides? A general pathologist is not the right person. I can't answer your other questions better than I have especially given the fact they aren't taking more tissue. You will have to ask your doc.
-
- December 5, 2015 at 6:15 am
It is a dermatopathologist, yeah I'm confused as well unless they cut part of the tissue and viewed it, trust me I'm just as confused and dermatologist is closed until monday, which is probably when the finally results will be done. The biopsy was 7x5x1mm no idea if that size plays a factor and they cut it to look at smaller sections or what
-
- December 5, 2015 at 6:15 am
It is a dermatopathologist, yeah I'm confused as well unless they cut part of the tissue and viewed it, trust me I'm just as confused and dermatologist is closed until monday, which is probably when the finally results will be done. The biopsy was 7x5x1mm no idea if that size plays a factor and they cut it to look at smaller sections or what
-
- December 5, 2015 at 6:15 am
It is a dermatopathologist, yeah I'm confused as well unless they cut part of the tissue and viewed it, trust me I'm just as confused and dermatologist is closed until monday, which is probably when the finally results will be done. The biopsy was 7x5x1mm no idea if that size plays a factor and they cut it to look at smaller sections or what
-
- December 5, 2015 at 5:48 am
I do not understand 'cut deeper' because typically, all biopsy tissue is analyzed. So that makes no sense to me. Is this a dermatopathologist who is reading the slides? A general pathologist is not the right person. I can't answer your other questions better than I have especially given the fact they aren't taking more tissue. You will have to ask your doc.
-
- December 5, 2015 at 5:04 am
They aren't doing anymore excisions on me. They're just doing it on the sample that was sent already.
So my main question is the report saying they think it might be a benign mole instead of a freckle? Or we think there is a mole that is cancerous is my wondering
-
- December 5, 2015 at 5:04 am
They aren't doing anymore excisions on me. They're just doing it on the sample that was sent already.
So my main question is the report saying they think it might be a benign mole instead of a freckle? Or we think there is a mole that is cancerous is my wondering
-
- December 5, 2015 at 4:29 am
Honestly, most path reports these days take a cya attitude. If they see something concerning, they mention it. Err on the side of worst case. Your extra excision seems to be the case of "we don't think there is a problem but we will take more tissue to analyze it -just in case". Typically an excision removes all skin down to the muscle fascia, but on the foot, I'm not sure if they will do that or not. You will have to ask your doc what type of biopsy/excision they intend to do.
-
- December 5, 2015 at 4:29 am
Honestly, most path reports these days take a cya attitude. If they see something concerning, they mention it. Err on the side of worst case. Your extra excision seems to be the case of "we don't think there is a problem but we will take more tissue to analyze it -just in case". Typically an excision removes all skin down to the muscle fascia, but on the foot, I'm not sure if they will do that or not. You will have to ask your doc what type of biopsy/excision they intend to do.
-
- December 5, 2015 at 3:29 am
So I talked to the dermatologist finally and she basically said the same thing. I don't get what it means by deeper cut, like what exactly does that mean or entail?
Janner or anyone else who has knowledge, I'm sure there are case where a few where something suspicous showed up, but typically from reports you've seen this is basically a report saying don't worry it's benign, we're just trying to figure out if its a mole or freckle?
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I would assume they would mention if they saw something suspicous in terms of cancer they would say it?
-
- December 5, 2015 at 3:29 am
So I talked to the dermatologist finally and she basically said the same thing. I don't get what it means by deeper cut, like what exactly does that mean or entail?
Janner or anyone else who has knowledge, I'm sure there are case where a few where something suspicous showed up, but typically from reports you've seen this is basically a report saying don't worry it's benign, we're just trying to figure out if its a mole or freckle?
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I would assume they would mention if they saw something suspicous in terms of cancer they would say it?
-
- December 3, 2015 at 10:07 pm
Acral tissue is different than cutaneous so I'm winging this a bit. An acral lentigo would essentially be a freckle. So the diagnosis is freckle with the caviat that there may be a dermal nevus. A nevus by itself is no big deal – it's a normal mole. So the pathologist will analyze the tissue to distinguish between lentigo and nevus. My initial impression is not that they are suspecting cancer, but they are covering all bases and making sure any deeper tissue is analyzed to make sure nothing untoward shows up.
-
Tagged: acral, cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.