Newly diagnosed melanoma insitua2
REGISTER
The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Newly diagnosed melanoma insitua2

› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Newly diagnosed melanoma insitua2

  • Post
    • September 15, 2013 at 4:34 am
    Kathy520
    Participant
    I have a question about melanoma, I just had a melanoma removed from my left upper abdominal area in situ stage 2 ,I also have a family history of melanoma . Should I be asking for testing or any other treatment?
Viewing 8 reply threads
  • Replies
      • September 15, 2013 at 5:58 am
      Janner
      Participant
      Do you have a copy of your pathology report? Your statement of stage doesn’t make sense. In situ melanoma is stage 0 and is a totally different beast than stage 2. If you could post your pathology report, that could help us understand your situation better. Treatment for those tages is quite different. Did you have a sentinel node biopsy? We need more details to be able to comment. Sorry you had to join us here.

      Best wishes,

      janner

      • September 15, 2013 at 5:58 am
      Janner
      Participant
      Do you have a copy of your pathology report? Your statement of stage doesn’t make sense. In situ melanoma is stage 0 and is a totally different beast than stage 2. If you could post your pathology report, that could help us understand your situation better. Treatment for those tages is quite different. Did you have a sentinel node biopsy? We need more details to be able to comment. Sorry you had to join us here.

      Best wishes,

      janner

      • September 15, 2013 at 5:58 am
      Janner
      Participant
      Do you have a copy of your pathology report? Your statement of stage doesn’t make sense. In situ melanoma is stage 0 and is a totally different beast than stage 2. If you could post your pathology report, that could help us understand your situation better. Treatment for those tages is quite different. Did you have a sentinel node biopsy? We need more details to be able to comment. Sorry you had to join us here.

      Best wishes,

      janner

      • September 15, 2013 at 9:21 am
      JC
      Participant

      Maybe the pathologist gave a differential diagnosis between in-situ and superficially invasive to level II (not stage II)?  Is that possible?

        • September 15, 2013 at 5:56 pm
        Janner
        Participant

        There are lots of possibilities, but without a path report, we can only speculate.

        • September 15, 2013 at 5:56 pm
        Janner
        Participant

        There are lots of possibilities, but without a path report, we can only speculate.

        • September 15, 2013 at 5:56 pm
        Janner
        Participant

        There are lots of possibilities, but without a path report, we can only speculate.

      • September 15, 2013 at 9:21 am
      JC
      Participant

      Maybe the pathologist gave a differential diagnosis between in-situ and superficially invasive to level II (not stage II)?  Is that possible?

      • September 15, 2013 at 9:21 am
      JC
      Participant

      Maybe the pathologist gave a differential diagnosis between in-situ and superficially invasive to level II (not stage II)?  Is that possible?

      • September 15, 2013 at 7:29 pm
      Kathy520
      Participant
      My microscopic description is 8x6x1mm in situ there is proliferation of atypical melanocytes arranged as solitary units and in nest at the dermal epidermal junction with scattered atypical melanocytes throughout the upper reaches of the epidermis. Where nests are present, they tend to confluence. The dermis contains a scattered inflammatory cell infiltrate with occasional bland appearing melanocytes and melanophages, though no no diagnostic invasive disease is seen. These findings are those of melanoma in situ arising in the background of a dysplastic Nevis. The lateral margin is involved. Re excision recommended in order to ensure complete removal then it say clinical diagnosis Nevius mm 8x6x1mmtoto3p1boa
        • September 15, 2013 at 10:20 pm
        Janner
        Participant
        So, where did you get stage 2? This appears to be melanoma in situ. Stage 0. The only treatment for this is surgical removal with 5mm clear margins. There is no need for any other treatments. Melanoma in situ is typically considered cured after removed. It is always good to pay attention to your body and watch your skin for changes. Report anything unusual to yout docs. Otherwise live life!
        • September 15, 2013 at 10:20 pm
        Janner
        Participant
        So, where did you get stage 2? This appears to be melanoma in situ. Stage 0. The only treatment for this is surgical removal with 5mm clear margins. There is no need for any other treatments. Melanoma in situ is typically considered cured after removed. It is always good to pay attention to your body and watch your skin for changes. Report anything unusual to yout docs. Otherwise live life!
        • September 15, 2013 at 10:20 pm
        Janner
        Participant
        So, where did you get stage 2? This appears to be melanoma in situ. Stage 0. The only treatment for this is surgical removal with 5mm clear margins. There is no need for any other treatments. Melanoma in situ is typically considered cured after removed. It is always good to pay attention to your body and watch your skin for changes. Report anything unusual to yout docs. Otherwise live life!
        • September 15, 2013 at 10:20 pm
        Janner
        Participant
        So, where did you get stage 2? This appears to be melanoma in situ. Stage 0. The only treatment for this is surgical removal with 5mm clear margins. There is no need for any other treatments. Melanoma in situ is typically considered cured after removed. It is always good to pay attention to your body and watch your skin for changes. Report anything unusual to yout docs. Otherwise live life!
        • September 15, 2013 at 11:15 pm
        Kathy520
        Participant
        My dermatologist said stage2
        • September 15, 2013 at 11:15 pm
        Kathy520
        Participant
        My dermatologist said stage2
        • September 15, 2013 at 11:15 pm
        Kathy520
        Participant
        My dermatologist said stage2
        • September 15, 2013 at 11:15 pm
        Kathy520
        Participant
        My dermatologist said stage2
        • September 16, 2013 at 12:27 am
        Janner
        Participant
        I would definitely talk to your derm about this because there is nothing in the path report to support stage 2. If this were anything but in situ, you would see a number in millimeters, a depth. This would be how deep the lesion went into the skin. In situ has no depth and the path report supports this. So it may be you misunderstood stage two somehow. Stage two would also have required a sentinel node biopsy where they surgically remove a lymph node. I would talk to your doc again.
        • September 16, 2013 at 12:27 am
        Janner
        Participant
        I would definitely talk to your derm about this because there is nothing in the path report to support stage 2. If this were anything but in situ, you would see a number in millimeters, a depth. This would be how deep the lesion went into the skin. In situ has no depth and the path report supports this. So it may be you misunderstood stage two somehow. Stage two would also have required a sentinel node biopsy where they surgically remove a lymph node. I would talk to your doc again.
        • September 16, 2013 at 12:27 am
        Janner
        Participant
        I would definitely talk to your derm about this because there is nothing in the path report to support stage 2. If this were anything but in situ, you would see a number in millimeters, a depth. This would be how deep the lesion went into the skin. In situ has no depth and the path report supports this. So it may be you misunderstood stage two somehow. Stage two would also have required a sentinel node biopsy where they surgically remove a lymph node. I would talk to your doc again.
        • September 15, 2013 at 11:15 pm
        Kathy520
        Participant
        My dermatologist said stage2
        • September 15, 2013 at 11:15 pm
        Kathy520
        Participant
        My dermatologist said stage2
        • September 15, 2013 at 10:20 pm
        Janner
        Participant
        So, where did you get stage 2? This appears to be melanoma in situ. Stage 0. The only treatment for this is surgical removal with 5mm clear margins. There is no need for any other treatments. Melanoma in situ is typically considered cured after removed. It is always good to pay attention to your body and watch your skin for changes. Report anything unusual to yout docs. Otherwise live life!
        • September 15, 2013 at 10:20 pm
        Janner
        Participant
        So, where did you get stage 2? This appears to be melanoma in situ. Stage 0. The only treatment for this is surgical removal with 5mm clear margins. There is no need for any other treatments. Melanoma in situ is typically considered cured after removed. It is always good to pay attention to your body and watch your skin for changes. Report anything unusual to yout docs. Otherwise live life!
      • September 15, 2013 at 7:29 pm
      Kathy520
      Participant
      My microscopic description is 8x6x1mm in situ there is proliferation of atypical melanocytes arranged as solitary units and in nest at the dermal epidermal junction with scattered atypical melanocytes throughout the upper reaches of the epidermis. Where nests are present, they tend to confluence. The dermis contains a scattered inflammatory cell infiltrate with occasional bland appearing melanocytes and melanophages, though no no diagnostic invasive disease is seen. These findings are those of melanoma in situ arising in the background of a dysplastic Nevis. The lateral margin is involved. Re excision recommended in order to ensure complete removal then it say clinical diagnosis Nevius mm 8x6x1mmtoto3p1boa
      • September 15, 2013 at 7:29 pm
      Kathy520
      Participant
      My microscopic description is 8x6x1mm in situ there is proliferation of atypical melanocytes arranged as solitary units and in nest at the dermal epidermal junction with scattered atypical melanocytes throughout the upper reaches of the epidermis. Where nests are present, they tend to confluence. The dermis contains a scattered inflammatory cell infiltrate with occasional bland appearing melanocytes and melanophages, though no no diagnostic invasive disease is seen. These findings are those of melanoma in situ arising in the background of a dysplastic Nevis. The lateral margin is involved. Re excision recommended in order to ensure complete removal then it say clinical diagnosis Nevius mm 8x6x1mmtoto3p1boa
Viewing 8 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Popular Topics