› Forums › Cutaneous Melanoma Community › New here with a diagnosis
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 2 months ago by cancersnewnormal.
- Post
-
- February 28, 2018 at 5:51 pm
Hi everyone!
I’m new here, just got the call on Monday. I’ve learned so much since yesterday reading thru all of your posts. I wish I had know more when I asked my GP to take a mole off last week. He did the basic biopsy (scrape I think it called). I regret that but I’m also happy that I actually went in to have it removed. It’s been nagging at me for awhile. Anyway…. my question is about the pathology report. Since it wasn’t a biopsy done by a fern, ate the results not as complete? I’ll copy and paste the results here. I’m just worried about it being worse that it shows on this report. I realize the Breslow could be deeper but is the rest of it reliable? Here is the report….
Histologic sections demonstrate a shave biopsy of
– skin with an atypical melanocytic proliferation
– with epidermal and dermal components. Within the
– epidermis, severely atypical melanocytes are seen
– in nests and as scattered solitary cells. There
– is both confluence of cells along the
– dermal-epidermal junction and pagetoid spread of
– single cells. The tumor extends inferiorly from
– the base of the epidermis in small budding nests.
– The tumor also extends down the adnexa. Focally,
– atypical melanocytes are also identified within
– the dermis.
F A DIAGNOSIS WZV
– Malignant melanoma, 0.6 mm (see synoptic report).
F A COMMENT WZV
– SYNOPTIC REPORT:
– Procedure: biopsy
– Laterality: left
– Tumor site: wrist
– Tumor size: not provided
– Histologic type: malignant melanoma, superficial
– spreading type
– Maximum tumor thickness (Breslow depth): 0.6 mm
– Clark level: II
– Ulceration: not identified
– Macroscopic satellite nodules: not identified
– Regression: not identified
– Lymphovascular invasion: not identified
– Neurotropism: not identified
– Margins: positive; melanoma in situ focally
– involves the superficial edge of the shave
– Mitotic rate per sq mm: 0
– Microsatellitosis: not identified
– Pathologic stage:
– TNM descriptors: not applicable
– Primary tumor: pT1a
– Regional lymph nodes: pNX
– Distant metastasis: cannot be assessedI have an appointment tomorrow for the WE
Thank you!!
Karmen
- Replies
-
-
- February 28, 2018 at 5:57 pm
Happy to read that final line about the wide excision appointment. You'll get a second pathology report following that. Good catch by you and your doctor to take that one off!
-
- February 28, 2018 at 7:25 pm
THank you! Trying to learn as much as possible. I was reading about Estrogen and Melonoma….just had my pellets re-done right before this happened. Now I'm freaking out even more. Not like I can stop taking them. I wonder if I can get them removed! LOL!
-
- March 1, 2018 at 6:04 pm
LOL…. I keep telling my husband how unfair it is to have had to deal with stage IV melanoma and still get my "monthly fertility reminder". ha! I'm 49 now… my son is 27. I've been done with these pieces parts for 27 years. I'm throwing a big ol' party when menopause is finally officially in place. HA HA HA!
-
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.