The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Malignant Melanoma in the 21st Century:

Forums General Melanoma Community Malignant Melanoma in the 21st Century:

  • Post
Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Replies
      PlantLady
      Participant

        Thanks for posting the link. 

        I need to aquire a new vocabulary to be able to understand most of this technical stuff, but I'll eventually catch on to the abbreviations and terms used on this board and in this article.  Too bad I took Home Ec instead of molecular biology and organic chemistry wink

        It is interesting that the article mentioned that a combination of therapies often seem to work better than singular ones.  Also that many of the drugs used in in clinical trials DO WORK, but the drugs are abandoned because the percentage of success is so low….yet the trials do help some.   What are the common factors, if any, of the people that responded, and how do they identify that?  The answer will probably be in molecular testing of individuals.

        To quote from the article: "The emerging pattern of molecular complexity in melanoma tumors mirrors the clinical diversity of the disease and highlights the notion that melanoma, like other cancers, is not a single disease but a heterogeneous group of disorders that arise from complex molecular changes.

        Defining an individual patient's unique tumor characteristics may lead to personalized prediction of outcomes and selection of therapy."

        That, right there, is the future.  It is likely the key.

        Such a bugger of a disease, but they're on the cusp of helping us.  We've gotta hang strong.

          JerryfromFauq
          Participant

            One of the problems is that many people look at Cancr a  o ne disease, when not even melnoma is just one disease.  Certainly BRAF  or C-kit Melanoma Cancer is not even one disease.

            Here is another interesting article I just found.  New equipment and processes that were not available a few years ago.  What promises for the future!

            http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/233053.php?nfid=76490

             

            PlantLady
            Participant

              So many mutations to shine that bright light at.  It is very interesting.

              PlantLady
              Participant

                So many mutations to shine that bright light at.  It is very interesting.

                JerryfromFauq
                Participant

                  One of the problems is that many people look at Cancr a  o ne disease, when not even melnoma is just one disease.  Certainly BRAF  or C-kit Melanoma Cancer is not even one disease.

                  Here is another interesting article I just found.  New equipment and processes that were not available a few years ago.  What promises for the future!

                  http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/233053.php?nfid=76490

                   

                  JerryfromFauq
                  Participant

                    One thing that has always been of interest is that in the labatory petri dishes, it seems a huge amount of things kill melaonma cells.  The problem is to get something into the body that will kill melanoma cell that have spread beyond one tumor.  This is one reason that I think that more direct injections would help at least slow down the faster growing tumors as well as possibly eliminate single tumors.

                      I never say tht someone should not try different drugs.  Almost everything seems to work on somebody.  The problem is that Melanoma won't give one time to try "everything" one at a time.

                    PlantLady
                    Participant

                      Sure, lots of things kill cancer cells….Arsenic will kill cancer cells in the petri dish.  It'll kill 'em in you, too, but of coarse the rest of you would die along with the cancer cells!

                      PlantLady
                      Participant

                        Sure, lots of things kill cancer cells….Arsenic will kill cancer cells in the petri dish.  It'll kill 'em in you, too, but of coarse the rest of you would die along with the cancer cells!

                        JerryfromFauq
                        Participant

                          One thing that has always been of interest is that in the labatory petri dishes, it seems a huge amount of things kill melaonma cells.  The problem is to get something into the body that will kill melanoma cell that have spread beyond one tumor.  This is one reason that I think that more direct injections would help at least slow down the faster growing tumors as well as possibly eliminate single tumors.

                            I never say tht someone should not try different drugs.  Almost everything seems to work on somebody.  The problem is that Melanoma won't give one time to try "everything" one at a time.

                        PlantLady
                        Participant

                          Thanks for posting the link. 

                          I need to aquire a new vocabulary to be able to understand most of this technical stuff, but I'll eventually catch on to the abbreviations and terms used on this board and in this article.  Too bad I took Home Ec instead of molecular biology and organic chemistry wink

                          It is interesting that the article mentioned that a combination of therapies often seem to work better than singular ones.  Also that many of the drugs used in in clinical trials DO WORK, but the drugs are abandoned because the percentage of success is so low….yet the trials do help some.   What are the common factors, if any, of the people that responded, and how do they identify that?  The answer will probably be in molecular testing of individuals.

                          To quote from the article: "The emerging pattern of molecular complexity in melanoma tumors mirrors the clinical diversity of the disease and highlights the notion that melanoma, like other cancers, is not a single disease but a heterogeneous group of disorders that arise from complex molecular changes.

                          Defining an individual patient's unique tumor characteristics may lead to personalized prediction of outcomes and selection of therapy."

                          That, right there, is the future.  It is likely the key.

                          Such a bugger of a disease, but they're on the cusp of helping us.  We've gotta hang strong.

                      Viewing 1 reply thread
                      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                      About the MRF Patient Forum

                      The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                      The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.