› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Malignant Melanoma in the 21st Century:
- This topic has 10 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by PlantLady.
- Post
-
- August 31, 2011 at 6:09 am
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/83/7/825.full
A long and very interesting on the state of melanoma investigations.
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/83/7/825.full
A long and very interesting on the state of melanoma investigations.
- Replies
-
-
- September 3, 2011 at 2:09 pm
Thanks for posting the link.
I need to aquire a new vocabulary to be able to understand most of this technical stuff, but I'll eventually catch on to the abbreviations and terms used on this board and in this article. Too bad I took Home Ec instead of molecular biology and organic chemistry
It is interesting that the article mentioned that a combination of therapies often seem to work better than singular ones. Also that many of the drugs used in in clinical trials DO WORK, but the drugs are abandoned because the percentage of success is so low….yet the trials do help some. What are the common factors, if any, of the people that responded, and how do they identify that? The answer will probably be in molecular testing of individuals.
To quote from the article: "The emerging pattern of molecular complexity in melanoma tumors mirrors the clinical diversity of the disease and highlights the notion that melanoma, like other cancers, is not a single disease but a heterogeneous group of disorders that arise from complex molecular changes.
Defining an individual patient's unique tumor characteristics may lead to personalized prediction of outcomes and selection of therapy."
That, right there, is the future. It is likely the key.
Such a bugger of a disease, but they're on the cusp of helping us. We've gotta hang strong.
-
- September 4, 2011 at 5:54 am
One of the problems is that many people look at Cancr a o ne disease, when not even melnoma is just one disease. Certainly BRAF or C-kit Melanoma Cancer is not even one disease.
Here is another interesting article I just found. New equipment and processes that were not available a few years ago. What promises for the future!
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/233053.php?nfid=76490
-
- September 4, 2011 at 5:54 am
One of the problems is that many people look at Cancr a o ne disease, when not even melnoma is just one disease. Certainly BRAF or C-kit Melanoma Cancer is not even one disease.
Here is another interesting article I just found. New equipment and processes that were not available a few years ago. What promises for the future!
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/233053.php?nfid=76490
-
- September 4, 2011 at 6:01 am
One thing that has always been of interest is that in the labatory petri dishes, it seems a huge amount of things kill melaonma cells. The problem is to get something into the body that will kill melanoma cell that have spread beyond one tumor. This is one reason that I think that more direct injections would help at least slow down the faster growing tumors as well as possibly eliminate single tumors.
I never say tht someone should not try different drugs. Almost everything seems to work on somebody. The problem is that Melanoma won't give one time to try "everything" one at a time.
-
- September 4, 2011 at 6:01 am
One thing that has always been of interest is that in the labatory petri dishes, it seems a huge amount of things kill melaonma cells. The problem is to get something into the body that will kill melanoma cell that have spread beyond one tumor. This is one reason that I think that more direct injections would help at least slow down the faster growing tumors as well as possibly eliminate single tumors.
I never say tht someone should not try different drugs. Almost everything seems to work on somebody. The problem is that Melanoma won't give one time to try "everything" one at a time.
-
- September 3, 2011 at 2:09 pm
Thanks for posting the link.
I need to aquire a new vocabulary to be able to understand most of this technical stuff, but I'll eventually catch on to the abbreviations and terms used on this board and in this article. Too bad I took Home Ec instead of molecular biology and organic chemistry
It is interesting that the article mentioned that a combination of therapies often seem to work better than singular ones. Also that many of the drugs used in in clinical trials DO WORK, but the drugs are abandoned because the percentage of success is so low….yet the trials do help some. What are the common factors, if any, of the people that responded, and how do they identify that? The answer will probably be in molecular testing of individuals.
To quote from the article: "The emerging pattern of molecular complexity in melanoma tumors mirrors the clinical diversity of the disease and highlights the notion that melanoma, like other cancers, is not a single disease but a heterogeneous group of disorders that arise from complex molecular changes.
Defining an individual patient's unique tumor characteristics may lead to personalized prediction of outcomes and selection of therapy."
That, right there, is the future. It is likely the key.
Such a bugger of a disease, but they're on the cusp of helping us. We've gotta hang strong.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.