The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Confused about diagnosis

Forums General Melanoma Community Confused about diagnosis

  • Post
    Raoulduke212
    Participant

    I had a odd looking mole biopsied.  I only spoke to the nurse, but she told me the pathology came back as "Severely Atypical Lentiginous Junctional Melanocytic Proliferation."  She says it's not cancer but when I google this term, I get nothing but melanoma articles.  Can someone explain this to me?

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Replies
      Janner
      Participant

      This is a severely atypical or dysplastic nevus.  It is NOT melanoma.  However, it should be treated with respect and removed with adequate margins (5mm – the same as melanoma in situ).  This may never have become melanoma, but severely atypical lesions have a higher risk of eventually turning into melanoma.  Since you've had one atypical mole, you should watch your other moles for CHANGE.  Anything changing should be shown to your derm.  Consider this a warning shot, but not a direct hit.

        Raoulduke212
        Participant

        Oh boy that's sobering.  Do you know what the increased risk of this turning into a melanoma is vs. a regular mole?

        Janner
        Participant

        There is no way to know that for certain.  Once they do a biopsy to determine the makeup, it's no longer there to monitor for change.  It would be a bit irresponsible to only do a partial biopsy and leave the rest in place to see what happens.  Basically, melanoma in situ has many of the same features, but an atypical nevus is just not atypical enough to be melanoma.  It's a matter of degrees and judgement by the pathologist.  Again, watch for CHANGE!  Take pictures if that helps.  

        Raoulduke212
        Participant

        I understand from what I've read on line that most of these atypical moles, even seriously atypical, usually do not become melanoma, is that acccurate?

        Raoulduke212
        Participant

        I understand from what I've read on line that most of these atypical moles, even seriously atypical, usually do not become melanoma, is that acccurate?

        Raoulduke212
        Participant

        I understand from what I've read on line that most of these atypical moles, even seriously atypical, usually do not become melanoma, is that acccurate?

        Janner
        Participant

        There is no way to know that for certain.  Once they do a biopsy to determine the makeup, it's no longer there to monitor for change.  It would be a bit irresponsible to only do a partial biopsy and leave the rest in place to see what happens.  Basically, melanoma in situ has many of the same features, but an atypical nevus is just not atypical enough to be melanoma.  It's a matter of degrees and judgement by the pathologist.  Again, watch for CHANGE!  Take pictures if that helps.  

        Janner
        Participant

        There is no way to know that for certain.  Once they do a biopsy to determine the makeup, it's no longer there to monitor for change.  It would be a bit irresponsible to only do a partial biopsy and leave the rest in place to see what happens.  Basically, melanoma in situ has many of the same features, but an atypical nevus is just not atypical enough to be melanoma.  It's a matter of degrees and judgement by the pathologist.  Again, watch for CHANGE!  Take pictures if that helps.  

        Raoulduke212
        Participant

        Oh boy that's sobering.  Do you know what the increased risk of this turning into a melanoma is vs. a regular mole?

        Raoulduke212
        Participant

        Oh boy that's sobering.  Do you know what the increased risk of this turning into a melanoma is vs. a regular mole?

      Janner
      Participant

      This is a severely atypical or dysplastic nevus.  It is NOT melanoma.  However, it should be treated with respect and removed with adequate margins (5mm – the same as melanoma in situ).  This may never have become melanoma, but severely atypical lesions have a higher risk of eventually turning into melanoma.  Since you've had one atypical mole, you should watch your other moles for CHANGE.  Anything changing should be shown to your derm.  Consider this a warning shot, but not a direct hit.

      Janner
      Participant

      This is a severely atypical or dysplastic nevus.  It is NOT melanoma.  However, it should be treated with respect and removed with adequate margins (5mm – the same as melanoma in situ).  This may never have become melanoma, but severely atypical lesions have a higher risk of eventually turning into melanoma.  Since you've had one atypical mole, you should watch your other moles for CHANGE.  Anything changing should be shown to your derm.  Consider this a warning shot, but not a direct hit.

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Popular Topics