The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

KDE

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Replies
      KDE
      Participant

      Thank you! 

      KDE
      Participant

      Thank you! 

      KDE
      Participant

      Thank you! 

      KDE
      Participant

      In reading some of the post here I see some concern over shave biopsys and if the depth measurement was correct or not. Mine was a shave biopsy and was quadrasected. The description reads "a flat piece of skin measuring 1.2 x 0.8 x 0.1 cm with an off centered brown patch measuring 0.7 x 0.5 cm quadrasected and entirely submitted in one cassette. Due to loss of elastic tension and tissue shrinkage in formulin, the clinical sizes may be larger than those reported here." 

      KDE
      Participant

      In reading some of the post here I see some concern over shave biopsys and if the depth measurement was correct or not. Mine was a shave biopsy and was quadrasected. The description reads "a flat piece of skin measuring 1.2 x 0.8 x 0.1 cm with an off centered brown patch measuring 0.7 x 0.5 cm quadrasected and entirely submitted in one cassette. Due to loss of elastic tension and tissue shrinkage in formulin, the clinical sizes may be larger than those reported here." 

      KDE
      Participant

      In reading some of the post here I see some concern over shave biopsys and if the depth measurement was correct or not. Mine was a shave biopsy and was quadrasected. The description reads "a flat piece of skin measuring 1.2 x 0.8 x 0.1 cm with an off centered brown patch measuring 0.7 x 0.5 cm quadrasected and entirely submitted in one cassette. Due to loss of elastic tension and tissue shrinkage in formulin, the clinical sizes may be larger than those reported here." 

      KDE
      Participant

      Thanks so much for answering. If there was depth to part of it then wouldn't there also be a vertical? A shave biopsy was done, then the WLE. Should I be concerned about the depth? Will the biopsy or WLE show that the depth was also excised? Sorry for all the questions, but thank you for talking with me. Im going back for my f/up from the WLE on 11/15 and will be able to talk to the dr more then. Im just concerned that he told me I have melanoma in situ and never said anything about the stage 1 part. I caught that myself in reading the report. Also, regarding the comment on the report, is that a description of what was seen in the epidermis and dermis? And why does that not mention melanoma? Just mentions atypical melanocytes and single cells. Thanks! 

      KDE
      Participant

      Thanks so much for answering. If there was depth to part of it then wouldn't there also be a vertical? A shave biopsy was done, then the WLE. Should I be concerned about the depth? Will the biopsy or WLE show that the depth was also excised? Sorry for all the questions, but thank you for talking with me. Im going back for my f/up from the WLE on 11/15 and will be able to talk to the dr more then. Im just concerned that he told me I have melanoma in situ and never said anything about the stage 1 part. I caught that myself in reading the report. Also, regarding the comment on the report, is that a description of what was seen in the epidermis and dermis? And why does that not mention melanoma? Just mentions atypical melanocytes and single cells. Thanks! 

      KDE
      Participant

      Thanks so much for answering. If there was depth to part of it then wouldn't there also be a vertical? A shave biopsy was done, then the WLE. Should I be concerned about the depth? Will the biopsy or WLE show that the depth was also excised? Sorry for all the questions, but thank you for talking with me. Im going back for my f/up from the WLE on 11/15 and will be able to talk to the dr more then. Im just concerned that he told me I have melanoma in situ and never said anything about the stage 1 part. I caught that myself in reading the report. Also, regarding the comment on the report, is that a description of what was seen in the epidermis and dermis? And why does that not mention melanoma? Just mentions atypical melanocytes and single cells. Thanks! 

      KDE
      Participant

      Could you tell me what you mean by radial growth phase? I did have wider margins taken, waiting on the results. Dr is telling me its melanoma in situ, but after reading this report over I was thinking stage 1. Thanks so much!! 

      KDE
      Participant

      Could you tell me what you mean by radial growth phase? I did have wider margins taken, waiting on the results. Dr is telling me its melanoma in situ, but after reading this report over I was thinking stage 1. Thanks so much!! 

      KDE
      Participant

      Could you tell me what you mean by radial growth phase? I did have wider margins taken, waiting on the results. Dr is telling me its melanoma in situ, but after reading this report over I was thinking stage 1. Thanks so much!! 

Viewing 1 reply thread
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.