ECTechnology
REGISTER
The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

ECTechnology

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Replies
      • June 10, 2016 at 8:58 pm
      ECTechnology
      Participant

      Just thought I would reply here to update. I received my results today from my derm. Dysplastic Nevus!

       

      JUNCTIONAL MELANOCYTIC NEVUS WITH MILD ARCHITECTURAL DISORDER

      AND MILD CYTOLOGIC ATYPIA ("DYSPLASTIC NEVUS"). THE LESION APPEARS

      TO BE COMPLETELY EXCISED.

      • June 10, 2016 at 8:58 pm
      ECTechnology
      Participant

      Just thought I would reply here to update. I received my results today from my derm. Dysplastic Nevus!

       

      JUNCTIONAL MELANOCYTIC NEVUS WITH MILD ARCHITECTURAL DISORDER

      AND MILD CYTOLOGIC ATYPIA ("DYSPLASTIC NEVUS"). THE LESION APPEARS

      TO BE COMPLETELY EXCISED.

      • June 10, 2016 at 8:58 pm
      ECTechnology
      Participant

      Just thought I would reply here to update. I received my results today from my derm. Dysplastic Nevus!

       

      JUNCTIONAL MELANOCYTIC NEVUS WITH MILD ARCHITECTURAL DISORDER

      AND MILD CYTOLOGIC ATYPIA ("DYSPLASTIC NEVUS"). THE LESION APPEARS

      TO BE COMPLETELY EXCISED.

      • June 8, 2016 at 2:35 am
      ECTechnology
      Participant

      Thanks Janner for your answer. What do you think of the 50/50 statement by the dermatologist? It seems to me the odds are much lower than 50% that the mole would be melanoma? It's very small, and I think has been there for some time (without growing).

      • June 8, 2016 at 2:35 am
      ECTechnology
      Participant

      Thanks Janner for your answer. What do you think of the 50/50 statement by the dermatologist? It seems to me the odds are much lower than 50% that the mole would be melanoma? It's very small, and I think has been there for some time (without growing).

      • June 8, 2016 at 2:35 am
      ECTechnology
      Participant

      Thanks Janner for your answer. What do you think of the 50/50 statement by the dermatologist? It seems to me the odds are much lower than 50% that the mole would be melanoma? It's very small, and I think has been there for some time (without growing).

Viewing 1 reply thread
About the MRF Patient Forum

The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

Popular Topics